Abstract
Thermal science is a perennial obstacle for learners. Infrared camera technology provides an opportunity for pupils to confront challenging thermal ideas. From an embodied cognition perspective, sensory experiences form metaphoric relations that underpin conceptualisation and reasoning about abstract scientific phenomena. This study investigated eight groups of fourth grade pupils’ use of metaphoric relations when engaging thermal cameras to explore “heat” at a science centre. Pupils were videorecorded while collaboratively exploring thermal properties of the surroundings and during a thermos modelling exercise. Qualitative metaphor analyses of pupils’ dialogue and behaviour revealed various metaphoric and metonymic relations around spatial properties, colour, movement and change in their conceptualisation of thermal phenomena. “Heat” was almost exclusively conceptualised as a noun, manifested in utterances such as “harder for the heat to escape” and “it wants to get yellow”. In addition, pupils used colour as both a metonym and metaphor for heat and temperature. Expressions of heat as an entity were closely related to experiences of movement, indicating that spatial cognition is central to children’s conceptualisation of heat. Engagement with the cameras provided access to thermodynamic phenomena through unique sensory and nonsensory experiences. Future research will explore how these metaphoric relations can be exploited as a meaning-making resource in the classroom.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Title case letters are used in the text to depict metaphoric relations.
- 2.
Both heat and temperature are stated as the target domain in this metaphor since it was not evident that the pupils distinguished between heat and temperature as two separate ontologies (see Wiser and Amin 2001).
References
Amin, T. G., Jeppsson, F., & Haglund, J. (2015). Conceptual metaphor and embodied cognition in science learning: Introduction to special issue. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025245.
Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2015). The importance of language in students’ reasoning about heat in thermodynamic processes. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025246.
Chu, H. E., Chandrasegaran, A. L., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Comparing two types of diagnostic items to evaluate understanding of heat and temperature concepts. School Science Review, 99(368), 107–116.
Derry, S. J., Pea, R. D., Barron, B., Engle, R. A., Erickson, F., Goldman, R., et al. (2010). Conducting video research in the learning sciences: Guidance on selection, analysis, technology, and ethics. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(1), 3–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903452884.
Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730630210.
Falk, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89(5), 744–778.
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J. (1999). The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 6, 1366–1383.
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concept: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310.
Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes: eScholarship. Berkeley: University of California.
Grady, J. (2005). Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37, 1595–1614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.012.
Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., Melander, E., Pendrill, A.-M., Xie, C., & Schönborn, K. J. (2016a). Infrared cameras in science education. Infrared Physics and Technology, 75, 150–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infrared.2015.12.009.
Haglund, J., Jeppsson, F., & Schönborn, K. J. (2016b). Taking on the heat—A narrative account of how infrared cameras invite instant inquiry. Research in Science Education, 46(5), 685–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9476-8.
Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., & Amin, T. G. (2015). Varying use of conceptual metaphors across levels of expertise in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 780–805.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body – Aestetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Keys, C. W. (1995). An interpretive study of students’ use of scientific reasoning during a collaborative report writing intervention in ninth grade general science. Science Education, 79(4), 415–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790405.
Kövesces, Z. (2013). The metaphor – Metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor ad Symbol, 28, 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.768498.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science. Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex.
Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1994). Heat energy and temperature concepts of adolescents, adults, and experts: Implications for curricular improvements. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(6), 657–678. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310607.
Moser, K. S. (2000, June). Metaphor analysis in psychology—Method, theory, and fields of application. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).
Murtagh, L. (2007). Implementing a critically quasi-ethnographic approach. The Qualitative Report, 12(2), 193–215.
Myers, N. (2008). Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modeling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 163–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082969.
Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026.
Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107–109. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1341254.
Schönborn, K., Haglund, J., & Xie, C. (2014). Pupils’ early explorations of thermoimaging to interpret heat and temperature. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(1), 118–132.
Vollmer, M., Möllmann, K.-P., Pinno, F., & Karstädt, D. (2001). There is more to see than eyes can detect—Visualization of energy transfer processes and the laws of radiation for physics education. The Physics Teacher, 39(6), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2266142.
Wiser, M., & Amin, T. G. (2001). “Is heat hot?” Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11(4–5), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00036-0.
Xie, C. (2018). The Concord consortium. Infrared tube. http://energy.concord.org/ir. Accessed 25 May 2018.
Xie, C., & Hazzard, E. (2011). Infrared imaging for inquiry-based learning. The Physics Teacher, 49(6), 368–372. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3628268.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Visualiseringscenter C for the opportunity to conduct the thermal workshops that provided the observations reported in this work, the visiting pupils and their teachers for their participation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsson, A., Stafstedt, M., Schönborn, K.J. (2019). Heat Angels and Paper Cups: Pupils’ Use of Metaphoric Relations When Engaging Thermal Cameras to Investigate Heat. In: McLoughlin, E., Finlayson, O.E., Erduran, S., Childs, P.E. (eds) Bridging Research and Practice in Science Education. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17219-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-17218-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-17219-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)