Skip to main content

The Implementation of Dynamic Business Process Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 71))

Abstract

The implementation of process management requires, first and foremost, the introduction of changes to the fundamental principles of management within the organization. It is insufficient for the owner or the CEO to decide on the development of new infrastructure, the purchase of new computers and new software, or even the introduction of comprehensive personnel training. Process management requires the use of proven methodologies and the skillful implementation of their supporting IT systems with a view to changing the organizational culture itself. The aim of this chapter is to present the results of studies on the higher efficiency of implementing and executing dynamic business process management, as compared with its traditional counterpart. The chapter then goes on to describe the changes in defining goals and preparing descriptions of business processes throughout the entire process lifecycle, which are the result of the requirements of business within the knowledge economy. The chapter provides an overview of the research and its conclusions, which point to the necessity of introducing changes to the principles of describing and presenting business processes. To conclude, the chapter presents the principles of implementing dynamic business process management, including the use of process exploration techniques, as well as the integration of process management with knowledge management. Drawing from the author’s personal experience, which stems from cooperation with diverse research teams executing commercial implementation projects in the years 2006–2017, as well as based on a review of relevant scholarship in the field, the chapter points to those fields, in which the use of a dynamic approach does not offer virtually any benefits, as well as those fields, in which it provides significantly better results than traditional process management or is a necessary condition for process management to provide any results at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, BPM Framework (Process Renewal Group), Customer Expectation Management Method (CEMM) (BM Group), Rapid Application Development and Systems Integration (BIZFLOW), IBM Playback Methodology (IBM).

  2. 2.

    The single Software Advice website compares as many as 134 ERP systems (http://www.softwareadvice.com/erp/), as well as 17 BPMS systems (http://www.softwareadvice.com/bpm/).

  3. 3.

    In the case if business its simply the process, thanks to which the organization makes profit (earns money). In the case of non-profit organizations, the fundamental process is the one for which the organization has been created to begin with.

References

  1. Senge P (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bitkowska A (2013) Zarządzanie procesowe we współczesnych organizacjach. Difin, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  3. Knudson G (2013) What is BPM? Retrieved from http://www.bpmleader.com/2013/07/29/what-is-bpm/ [4.11.2013]

  4. Highsmith J (2009) APM: agile project management creating innovative products, 2nd edn. Addison Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alliance S (2016) Learn about scrum. Retrieved from https://www.scrumalliance.org/why-scrum [18. 08. 2017]

  6. Thompson JR, Koronacki J, Nieckuła J (2005) Techniki zarządzania jakością od Shewarta do metody “Six Sigma”. Akademicka Oficyna Wydawnicza EXIT, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mahal A (2010) How work gets done: business process management, basics and beyond. Technics Publications, LLC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nowosielski S (2012) Zarządzanie procesami. Retrieved from http://procesy.ue.wroc.pl/uploads/pliki/procesy/wyklady/ZPRnowosielskiWYKLAD.pdf [8.08.2017]

  9. Szelągowski M (2004) Szczegółowość identyfikacji procesów i działań w zarządzaniu dynamicznymi procesami biznesowymi. Zeszyty Naukowe. In: Studia i Prace, vol 49. KZiF SGH, Warszawie, pp 114–128

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nowosielski S (2009) Modelowanie procesów gospodarczych w literaturze i praktyce. In: Prace Naukowe UE we Wrocławiu, vol 52. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego, Wrocławiu

    Google Scholar 

  11. OMG (2013) Business process model and notation (BPMN) v2.0.2. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/PDF/ [3.04.2016]

  12. Liker JK (2005). Droga Toyoty. 14 zasad zarządzania wiodacej firmy produkcyjnej świata (The Toyota way. 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer). MT Biznes Ltd, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trkman P (2009) The critical success factors of business process management. Int J Inf Manage 30(2):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dabaghkashani AZ, Hajiheydari BN, Haghighinasab CM (2012) A success model for business process management implementation. Int J Inf Electron Eng 5(2), Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2010) The six core elements of business process management. In: Handbook on business process management 1. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pucher M (2012) How to link BPM governance and social collaboration through an adaptive paradigm. In: Fischer L (ed) Social BPM: work, planning and collaboration under the impact of social technology. Future Strategies Inc, Lighthouse Point, pp 57–76

    Google Scholar 

  17. Di Ciccio C, Marrella A, Russo A (2012) Knowledge-intensive processes: an overview of contemporary approaches? In: 1st International workshop on knowledge—intensive business processes (KiBP 2012), Rome, Italy, 15 June. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-861/KiBP2012_paper_2.pdf [2.04.2016]

  18. OMG (2014) Case management model and notation (CMMN) v1.0. Retrieved from http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.0/PDF [1.08.2017]

  19. Kania K (2013) Doskonalenie zarządzania procesami biznesowymi w organizacji z wykorzystaniem modeli dojrzałości i technologii informacyjno-komunikacyjnych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach, Katowice

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rothschadl T (2012) Ad-hoc adaptation of subject-oriented business processes at runtime to support organizational learning. In: Stary C (ed) S-BPM ONE—scientific research: 4th international conference, S-BPM ONE 2012, Vienna, Austria, 4–5 April 2012. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knudson G (2014) BPM-based case management frameworks. Retrieved from http://www.bizflow.com/bpm-software/blog/BPM-based-case-manage-ment-frameworks-CMF [04.05.2015]

  22. Belaychuk A (2011) ACM: paradigm or feature? Retrieved from http://mainthing.ru/item/401/ [21.01.2011]

  23. Dufresne T, Martin J (2003) Process modeling for e-business. INFS 770—methods for information systems engineering: knowledge management and e-business. Retrieved from http://odesso.com/sites/default/files/documents/processmodeling.doc [21.02.2017]

  24. Mello A (2014) How to avoid the 10 biggest mistakes in process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.bptrends.com/how-to-avoid-the-10-biggest-mistakes-in-process-modeling/ [17.02.2017]

  25. Waszkowski R, Kiedrowicz M (2015) Business rules automation standards in business process management systems. In: Kubiak BW, Maślankowski J (ed) Information management in practice. Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, Gdańsk, pp 187–200

    Google Scholar 

  26. Betz S, Eichhorn D, Hickl S, Klink S, Koschmider A, Li Y, Trunko R (2009) 3D representation of business process models. Retrieved from http://subs.emis.de/LNI/Proceedings/Proceedings141/gi-proc-141-005.pdf [2.06.2017]

  27. Effinger P (2013) A 3D-navigator for business process models. In: La Rosa M, Soffer P (eds) Business process management workshops. BPM 2012. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 132. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. State of Queensland (2017) Possible cardiac chest pain clinical pathway. Retrieved from https://www.health.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/439131/sw574-chest-pain-pathway.pdf [14.01.2018]

  29. Gabryelczyk R, Jurczuk A, Pęczkowski M (2016) Determinanty wyboru notacji modelowania procesów biznesowych. Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych SGH, no. 40, pp 357–370

    Google Scholar 

  30. Price RJ, Shanks G (2004) A semiotic information quality framework. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.83.9817&rep=rep1&type=pdf [17.02.2017]

  31. Wahl T, Sindre G (2006) An analytical evaluation of BPMN using a semiotic quality framework. Retrieved from http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-363/paper14.pdf [17.02.2017]

  32. Gabryelczyk R, Jurczuk A (2015) Comparative analysis of business processes notation understandability. Information management in practice. Uniwersytet Gdański, Wydział Zarządzania, Sopot

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sobczak A (2013) Architektura korporacyjna. Aspekty teoretyczne i wybrane zastosowania praktyczne. Ośrodek Studiów nad Państwem Cyfrowym

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kemsley S (2010) Runtime collaboration and dynamic modeling in BPM: allowing the business to shape its own processes on the fly. Cut IT J 23(2):35–39

    Google Scholar 

  35. Szelągowski M (2014) Konsekwencje dynamic BPM. E-mentor 4(56):61–68. Retrieved from http://www.e-mentor.edu.pl/artykul/index/numer/56/id/1126 [21.09.2016]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gottanka R, Meyer N (2012) ModelAsYouGo: (re-)design of S-BPM process models during execution time. In: Stary C (ed), S-BPM ONE 2012, LNBIP 104. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp 91–105

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ultimus (2004) Adaptive discovery. Accelerating the deployment and adaptation of automated business processes. Retrieved from http://www.ultimus.com/download-the-adaptive-discovery-whitepaper

  38. ISIS Papyrus (2016) Adaptive processes. Retrieved from http://www.isis-papyrus.com/e15/pages/business-apps/adaptive-case-management/adaptive-process.html [4.04.2016]

  39. Hammer M (1999) Reinżynieria i jej następstwa—jak organizacje skoncentrowane na procesach zmieniają naszą pracę i nasze życie (Beyond reengineering. How the process-centered organization is changing our work and our lives). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN SA, Warszawa

    Google Scholar 

  40. IEEE Task Force on Process Mining (2012) Process mining manifesto. Retrieved from: http://www.win.tue.nl/ieeetfpm/doku.php?id=shared:process_mining_manifesto [02.04.2016]

  41. Gawande A (2009) The checklist manifesto how to get things right. Metropolitan Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  42. Swenson K (2010) Mastering the unpredictable: how adaptive case management will revolutionize the way that knowledge workers get things done. Meghan-Kiffer Press, Tampa (USA)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Krogstie J, Sindre G, Jørgensen H (2006) Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework. Eur J Inf Syst 15(2006):91–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. IBM (2012) Scaling BPM adoption: from project to program with IBM business process manager, 2nd edn

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chan N, Yongsiriwit K, Gaaloul W, Mendling J (2014) Mining Event Logs to Assist the Development of Executable Process Variants. In: Jarke M et al (eds), CAiSE 2014, LNCS 8484, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp 548–563

    Google Scholar 

  46. HandySoft. (2012) Dynamic BPM—the value of embedding process into dynamic work activities: a comparison between BPM and E-mail. Retrieved from http://www.bizflow.com/system/files/downloads/HandySoft%20-%20Dynamic%20BPM%20White%20Paper_0.pdf [2.04.2016]

  47. Murray P, Myers A (1997) The facts about knowledge. Special report, 11. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Measuring the strategic readiness of intangible assets. Harv Bus Rev

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Szelągowski .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Szelągowski, M. (2019). The Implementation of Dynamic Business Process Management. In: Dynamic Business Process Management in the Knowledge Economy. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 71. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-17141-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics