Religion, Empathy, and Cooperation: A Case Study in the Promises and Challenges of Modeling and Simulation
The Cognitive Science of Religion (CSR) is developing a sophisticated naturalistic account of religion, grounded in empirical research. However, there are limitations to establishing an empirical basis for theories about religion’s role in human evolution. Computer modeling and simulation offers a way to address this experimental constraint. A case study in this approach was conducted on a key theory within CSR that recently has come under serious challenge: the Supernatural Punishment Hypothesis, which posits religion facilitated the shift from small, homogeneous social units to large, complex societies. It has been proposed that incorporating empathy as a proximate mechanism for cooperation into the theory may address these challenges. To test this, we developed a computer simulation that runs iterated cooperation games. To assess the impact of empathy on cooperation, we developed an agent-based model with a baseline for empathetic concern, derived from neuroscientific literature on empathy and cooperation, that could be modulated by signals of religious identity. The results of this simulation may provide important data for an account of religion’s role in human evolution. Results and their implications, for both the theory and the modeling and simulation approach, are discussed.
KeywordsEmpathy Cooperation Supernatural punishment Evolution Prisoner’s Dilemma
The authors with to thank Justin E. Lane for generously providing time and effort in programming the model and patiently explaining the process as we went along. Without him, this chapter would obviously have not been possible.
- Alexander, R.D. 1987. The biology of moral systems. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, J., T. Pyszczynski, L.S. Solomon, A. Rosenblatt, M. Veeder, S. Kirkland, and D. Lyon. 1990. Evidence of terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 308–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gutsell, J.N., and M. Inzlicht. 2012. Intergroup differences in the sharing of emotive states: Neural evidence of an empathy gap. SCAN 7: 596–603.Google Scholar
- Henry, E., B. Bartholow, and J. Arndt. 2010. Death on the brain: Effects of mortality salience on the neural correlates of ingroup and outgroup categorization. SCAN 5: 77–87.Google Scholar
- Irons, W. 2001. Religion as a hard-to-fake sign of commitment. In Evolution and the capacity for commitment, ed. R. Nesse, 290–309. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- ———. 2016. God is watching you: How the fear of God makes us human. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2018. The wrath of the academics: Criticisms, applications, and extensions of the supernatural punishment hypothesis. Religion, Brain & Behavior 8 (3): 320–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/215399X.2017.1302986.
- Marino, L., R.C. Connor, R.E. Fordyce, L.M. Herman, P.R. Hof, L. Lefebvre, D. Lusseau, B. McCowan, E.A. Nimchinsky, A.A. Pack, L. Rendell, J.S. Reidenberg, D. Reiss, M.D. Uhen, E. Van der Gucht, and H. Whitehead. 2007. Cetaceans have complex brains for complex cognition. PLoS Biology 5: e139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mathieu, P., and J.-P. Delahaye. 2017. New winning strategies for the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. JASSS 20 (4). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3517.
- Shaver, J.H., and J.A. Bulbulia. 2016. Signaling theory and religion. In Mental Religion, 101–117. Farmington Hills: Macmillan Interdisciplinary Handbooks.Google Scholar
- Shults, F.L. 2014. Theology after the birth of God: Atheist conceptions in cognition and culture. Radical theologies. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- ———. 2018. Practicing safe sects: Religious reproduction in scientific and philosophical perspective. Brill.Google Scholar
- Sosis, R. 2006. Religious behaviors, badges, and bans: Signaling theory and the evolution of religion. In Where God and science meet, ed. P. McNamara. Westport: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
- Teehan, J. 2016. Religion and morality: The evolution of the cognitive nexus. In Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology and religion, ed. James R. Liddle and Todd K. Shackelford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199397747.013.11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Watts, J., S.J. Greenhill, Q.D. Atkinson, T.E. Currie, J. Bulbulia, and R.D. Gray. 2015. Broad supernatural punishment but not moralizing high gods precede the evolution of political complexity in Austronesia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282: 20142556. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Xygalatas, D., P. Mitkidis, R. Fischer, P. Reddish, J. Skewes, A. Geertz, Bulbulia Roepstorff, and J. 2013. Extreme rituals promote prosociality. Psychological Science 20 (10): 1–4.Google Scholar