Ethics, Computer Simulation, and the Future of Humanity
This chapter explores some of the key ethical issues impacting the field of computer modeling and simulation (M&S) in general and “human simulation” in particular. The first section discusses the “code of ethics” that has been adopted by many societies within the professional M&S community. The second section takes up several examples of computational models of human ethics and simulations for ethical training. The third section presents a meta-ethical framework for guiding ethical analysis within M&S; this framework is not a set of ethical guidelines, but a toolkit for guiding ethical decision-making in this interdisciplinary endeavor. In the fourth section, we ask: even if we can model the origin and destiny of humanity, does that mean we should? Finally, in the conclusion we issue an ethical challenge to M&S professionals.
KeywordsMeta-ethics Teleological ethics Deontological ethics Evolutionary ethics Bio-cultural evolution Religion Prediction
- Barrett, J.L. 2004. Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 2012. Born believers: The science of childhood religion. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Berger, P.L., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
- Binmore, Ken. 1994. Game theory and the social contract, Vol. 1: Playing fair. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bissell, John, Camila Caiado, Sarah Curtis, Michael Goldstein, and Brian Straughan, eds. 2015. Tipping points: Modelling social problems and health. 1st ed. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bostrom, Nick, and Eliezer Yudkowsky. 2014. The ethics of artificial intelligence. In The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence, 316–334. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, Mark. 2008. The social atom: Why the rich get richer, cheaters get caught, and your neighbor usually looks like you. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.Google Scholar
- Conte, Rosaria, Giulia Andrighetto, and Marco Campennì. 2014. Minding norms: Mechanisms and dynamics of social order in agent societies. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dignum, V., F. Dignum, S. A. Osinga, and G. J. Hofstede. 2010. Normative, Cultural and Cognitive Aspects of Modelling Policies.” In Proceedings – Winter simulation conference, 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2010.5679115.
- Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
- Heath, Brian L., and Ross A. Jackson. 2013. Ontological implications of modeling and simulation in postmodernity. In Ontology, epistemology, and teleology for modeling and simulation, ed. Andreas Tolk, 890–103. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Himma, Kenneth E., and Herman T. Tavani. 2008. The handbook of information and computer ethics. Hoboken: Wiley. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/agder/detail.action?docID=353290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kettenis, Dirk L. 2000. Modeling and simulation impacts on society and the ethical dilemmas they create. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation International 17 (4): 181–186.Google Scholar
- Lemos, Carlos M. 2017. Agent-based modeling of social conflict: From mechanisms to complex behavior. 1st ed. 2018 edition. Springer.Google Scholar
- Mascaro, Steven, Kevin B. Korb, Ann E. Nicholson, and Owen Woodberry. 2010. Evolving ethics: The new science of good and evil. Charlottesville: Imprint Academic. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/inu.30000127033425.
- McLeod, John. 1986. But, Mr. President – Is it ethical? Proceedings of the 1986 Winter simulation conference, 1–3.Google Scholar
- Murrugarra, Ruth I., and William A. Wallace. 2017. Agent-based simulation for teaching ethics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference, ed. W.K.V. Chan, A. D’Ambrogio, G. Zacharewicz, N. Mustafee, G. Wainer, and E. Page, 4220–4227.Google Scholar
- Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1989. On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo. ed. Walter Kaufmann, Reissue edition. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
- Ören, Tuncer I. 2000. Responsibility, ethics, and simulation. Transactions 17 (4).Google Scholar
- Ören, Tuncer I., Maurice S. Elzas, Iva Smit, and Louis G. Birta. 2002. Code of professional ethics for simulationists. In Summer computer simulation conference, 434–435. Society for Computer Simulation International; 1998.Google Scholar
- Pentland, Alex. 2014. Social physics: How good ideas spread -the lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Puga-Gonzalez, I., and C. Sueur. 2017. Friendships and social networks in an individual-based model of primate social behaviour. JASSS 20 (3). https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3450.
- Puga-Gonzalez, Ivan, Marina Butovskaya, Bernard Thierry, Charlotte Korinna Hemelrijk, and Stephen C. Pratt. 2014. Empathy versus parsimony in understanding post-conflict affiliation in monkeys: Model and empirical data. PLoS One 9 (3): e91262. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rawls, John. 2005. A theory of justice: Original edition, Reissue edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, N., A. Hart, J. Wilson, M. Livingston, D. Moore, and P. Dietze. 2016. The effects of extended public transport operating hours and venue lockout policies on drinking-related harms in Melbourne, Australia: Results from SimDrink, an agent-based simulation model. International Journal of Drug Policy 32: 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.02.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shults, F. LeRon. 2018. Can we predict and prevent religious radicalization? pp. 45–71 In Violent extremism in the 21st century: International perspectives, ed Gwenyth Øverland. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
- Shults, F. LeRon, Ross Gore, Wesley J. Wildman, Justin E. Lane, Chris Lynch, and Monica Toft. 2018a. A generative model of the mutual escalation of anxiety between religious groups. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 21(4): 1–24.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, Michael. 2012. Simulation and similarity: Using models to understand the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wildman, Wesley J., and Richard Sosis. 2011. Stability of groups with costly beliefs and practices. JASSS 14 (3).Google Scholar