Skip to main content

Psychological Countermeasures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stress Challenges and Immunity in Space

Abstract

This chapter reviews the current “state of the art” and considers new countermeasures for preventing or reducing the likelihood of psychological problems and supporting psychological resilience among crewmembers during long-duration space missions. Here emphasis will be put on effective astronaut selection, crew composition, training, and support of multicultural crews on long-duration missions. Historic differences among national space agencies in their attention to and application of psychological methods spanning the selection through the mission process are discussed. The continuation of future multinational long-duration space missions requires further culturally sensitive psychological research and operational planning to maintain health and performance, and prevent human errors and accidents. The next steps of future technology such as virtual reality or robotic assistants open new opportunities that need to be discussed before and tested also on Earth and Earth orbit as well, also with their impact on the crews’ health and well-being. The development of these technologies is crucial for supporting crews not only on a voyage to Mars but also during their stay on the planetary surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abraham K, Aldrin B (2009) Voices from the Moon. Nature 460:328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson AP, Fellows AM, Binsted KA et al (2016) Autonomous, computer-based behavioral health countermeasure evaluation at HI_SEAS Mars analog. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 87(11):912–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessone L, Coffey E, Filippova N, Greenberg E, Inoue N, Gittens M et al (2008) International Space Station human behavior & performance competency model. NASA/TM-2008-214775, vol 2. NASA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough B (1998) Dragonfly: NASA and the crisis aboard MIR. Fourth Estate Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Choukèr A, Thiel M, Baranov V, Meshkov D, Peter K, Messmer K, Christ F (2001) Simulated microgravity, psychic stress, and immune cells in men: observations during 120-day 6° HDT. J Appl Physiol 90:1736–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crucian BE, Choukèr A, Simpson RJ, Mehta S, Marshall G, Smith SM, Zwart SR, Heer M, Ponomarev S, Whitmire A, Frippiat JP, Douglas GL, Lorenzi H, Buchheim JI, Makedonas G, Ginsburg GS, Ott CM, Pierson DL, Krieger SS, Baecker N, Sams C (2018) Immune system dysregulation during spaceflight: potential countermeasures for deep space exploration missions. Front Immunol 28(9):1437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Feltz DL, Ploutz-Snyder L, Winn B, Kerr NL, Pivarnik JM, Ede A, Hill C, Samendinger S, Jeffery W (2016) Simulated partners and collaborative exercise (SPACE) to boost motivation for astronauts: study protocol. BMC Psychol 4(1):54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher D, Sarkar M (2013) Psychological resilience. A review and critique of definitions, concepts, and theory. Eur J Psychol 18:12–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazenko OG (1980) Psychological compatibility on Earth and in outer space. Aviat Space Environ Med 51:622–623

    Google Scholar 

  • Gushin VI, Zaprisa NS, Kolinitchenko TB et al (1997) Content analysis of the crew communication with external communicants under prolonged isolation. Aviat Space Environ Med 68:1093–1098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson AM, Kalogera K, Sandor A, Hardy M, Frank A, Amonette W, English K, Williams T, Perera J (2017) Evaluation of the next-gen exercise software interface in the NEEMO analog. NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX. NASA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison AAF, Fiedler ER (2011) Introduction. Psychology and the U.S. space program. In: Vakoch DA (ed) Psychology of space exploration: contemporary research in historical perspective. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue N, Tachibana S (2013) An isolation and confinement facility for the selection of astronaut candidates. Aviat Space Environ Med 84(8):867–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PJ (2012) The roles of NASA, U.S. astronauts, and their families in long-duration missions. In: Vakoch DA (ed) On orbit and beyond. Springer, New York, NY, pp 69–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N (2015) Humans in space. The psychological hurdles. Springer, Cham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N, Manzey D (2008) Space psychology and psychiatry, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kanas N, Salnitskiy V, Grund E et al (2000) Interpersonal and cultural issues involving crews and ground personnel during Shuttle/Mir space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 7:A11–A16

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon LB, Rokholt C, Slack KJ, Pecena Y (2017) Selection best prectices, critical factors, and skills. In: Sgobba BKT, Clervoy JF, Sandal GM (eds) Space safety and human performance. Elsevier. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 731–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon GR (2009) Strategies to optimize individual and team performance. In: Building a safer space together. The 3rd International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety Conference (IAASS), Rome 2009. European Space Agency Communication Production Office, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Leon G, Sandal GM, Fink B et al (2011) Positive experiences and personal growth in a two-man North Pole expedition team. Environ Behav 43(5):710–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linenger JM (2002) Letters from MIR: an astronaut’s letters to his son. McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzey D (2003) Study of the survivability and adaptation of humans to long-duration interplanetary and planetary environments. ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk

    Google Scholar 

  • Maschke P, Oubaid V, Pecena Y (2011) How do astronaut candidate profiles differ from airline pilot profiles? Results from the 2008/2009 ESA astronaut selection. Aviat Psychol Appl Hum Fact 1(1):38–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel JI, Chouker A (2016) Effects of isolation and confinement on humans-implications for manned space explorations. J Appl Physiol 120(12):1449–1457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ritsher JB (2005) Cultural factors and the International Space Station. Aviat Space Environ Med 76(6, Suppl):B135–B144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saksvik IB, Bjorvatn B, Hetland H, Sandal GM, Pallesen S (2011) Individual differences in tolerance to shift work--a systematic review. Sleep Med Rev 15(4):221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandal GM, Leon GR (2011) From the past to the future. In: Vakoch DA (ed) Psychology of space exploration: contemporary research in historical perspective (The NASA History Series). National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, pp 195–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal GM, Værnes R, Ursin H (1995) Interpersonal relations during simulated space missions. Aviat Space Environ Med 66:617–624

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandal GM, Groenningsaeter H, Eriksen HR, Gravraakmo A, Birkeland K, Ursin H (1998) Personality and endocrine activation in military stress situations. Mil Psychol 10(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandal GM, Bye HH, van de Vijver FJR (2011) Personal values and crew compatibility during a simulated space mission, vol 69, pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik AM, Bartone PT, Hystad SW, Phillips TM, Thayer JF, Johnsen BH (2013) Psychological hardiness predicts neuroimmunological responses to stress. Psychol Health Med 18(6):705–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santy P (1994) Choosing the right stuff: the psychological selection of astronauts and cosmonauts. Praeger, Westport/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slack KJ, Holland A, Sipes W (2014). Selecting astronauts: the role of psychologists. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonnenfeld G (2002) The immune system in space and microgravity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34(12):2021–2027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gro Mjeldheim Sandal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sandal, G.M., Leon, G.R. (2020). Psychological Countermeasures. In: Choukèr, A. (eds) Stress Challenges and Immunity in Space. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16996-1_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16996-1_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16995-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16996-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics