Skip to main content

Available Transfer Capability Enhancement by Generator Participation Factor

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Techno-Societal 2018

Abstract

Restructuring has replaced the vertically integrated power system. Along with the benefits, deregulation has brought some technical challenges like congestion. Available transfer capability (ATC) is a measure of how much MW power can be transmitted further over the already committed use, without violating the security constraints. Fast and accurate calculation of ATC is necessary for power transaction. Generator Participation Factor (GPF) is a measure of change in generator power as a response to change in load demand. This paper focuses on calculation and enhancement of ATC using (GPF). Results have been obtained on IEEE 6 bus system and validated on power world simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shahidehpour M, Almoush M Restructured electric power system. Marcel- Deccer Publishers, New York, pp 158–159. CRC Press: 1 edition (June 6, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhattacharya K (2001) Operation of restructured power systems. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berkeley, pp 15–21

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudnick H (1996) Planning in a deregulated environment in developing countries: Bolivia, Chile, Peru. IEEE Power Eng Rev 16(7):18–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Christie R, Wangestin I (2000) Transmission management in deregulated environment. IEEE Proc 88:170–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. North American Electric Reliability Council (NERC) Available transfer capability definitions and determination. NERC report, June 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer PW Technical challenges of computing Available Transfer Capability (ATC) in electric power systems. In: Proceedings, 3tfh Annual Hawai international conference on system sciences, 7–10 January 1997 pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ruiz-Vega D, Pavella M (2003) A comprehensive approach to transient stability control. Part II: open loop emergency control. IEEE Trans Power Syst 18(4):1454–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiang HD et al (1995) CPFLOW: A practical tool for tracing power system steady state stationery behavior due to load and generation variations. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10(2):623–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava et al (2004) ATC determination in a competitive electricity market using AC distribution factors. Electr Power Compon Syst 32 10(2):927–939, May 95

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar A, Srivastava SC (2002) AC power transfer distribution factors for allocating power transactions in aderegulated market. IEEE Power Eng Rev 22(7):42–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Venkatesh et al (2004) Available transfer capability determination using power distribution factors. J Emerg Electr Power Syst 1(2)., Article1009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Purchala K, Van Dommelen D, Belmans R (2005) Usefulness of DC power flow for active power flow analysis. IEEE Power Eng Soc Gen Meet 1:454–459

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bialek J (1996) Tracing the flow of electricity. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 143(4):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pillay A, Prabhakar Karthikeyan S, Kothari DP (2015) Congestion management in power systems – a review. Electr Power Energy Syst 70:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghawghawe ND, Thakre KL (2008) Determination of the impact of load variations on generator participations. In: Power System Technology and IEEE power India conference

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Z et al (2004) Generator ranking using modal analysis. Gen Trans Dis IEE Proc 150(6):709–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tong S, Miu KN (2006) Participation factor studies for distributed slack bus models in three-phase distribution power flow analysis. In: Transmission and distribution conference and exhibition, IEEE PES

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kopcak I et al Transmission systems congestion management by using modal participation factors. In: Power Tech conference proceedings, 2003 IEEE Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ghawghawe ND, Thakre KL ATC evaluation with consideration of load changes and participation factors- a sensitivity analysis approach, pp 124–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rane, P.R., Ghawghawe, N.D. (2020). Available Transfer Capability Enhancement by Generator Participation Factor. In: Pawar, P., Ronge, B., Balasubramaniam, R., Vibhute, A., Apte, S. (eds) Techno-Societal 2018 . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16848-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics