Abstract
This conclusion summarises and develops seven cases studies aiming to shed light on the spatial condition for urban interreligious projects. The characteristic of cooperation may (partly) be contrasted to religious pluralism characterised by competition, conflict and violence. As physical spaces for meeting, rooted in the histories of areas and of communities, the places in question are the sites where visions and perceptions meet material and social realities. We attempt to show that the aim of cooperation is intertwined in relationships originated in both perceptions and visions of places and through interactions in the embodiments related to physical constructions. Linked to vision and embodiment are the negotiations and contestations that are often found to be present when examples of cooperation are analysed regarding how place is enacted and interpreted by the groups and individuals involved. The interreligious activities highlighted in these cases illuminate dilemmatic situations when actors representing and belonging to different religious communities encounter each other with the main purpose to cooperate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination. Four Essays by Michail Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bugg, L. 2013. Citizenship and Belonging in the Rural Fringe: A Case Study of a Hindu Temple in Sydney, Australia. Antipode 5 (5): 1148–1166.
Crompton, A. 2013. The Architecture of Multifaith Spaces: God Leaves the Building. The Journal of Architecture 18 (4): 474–496.
Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.
Knott, K. 2005. The Location of Religion. A Spatial Analysis. Durham: Acumen.
Kong, L. 2016. Religion and Space: Competition, Conflict, and Violence in the Contemporary World. London: Bloombury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Liljestrand, J. 2018. The Place and Conditions for Democratic Education in Interreligious Encounters. Religious Education 113 (1): 38–48.
Massey, D. 1993. Politics and Space/Time. In Place and the Politics of Identity, ed. M. Michael and S. Pile. London: Routledge.
———. 1994. Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moulin-Stozek, D., and F. Gatty. 2018. A House of Prayer for All Peoples? The Unique Case of Somerville College Chapel, Oxford. Material Religion. The Journal of Objects, Art and Belief 14 (1): 83–114.
Nagel, A. 2018. Dialogical Practice in Urban Spaces. Comments from a Sociological Perspective. In Religion and Dialogue in the City. Case Studies on Interreligious Encounter in Community and Education, ed. J. Ipgrave, T. Knauth, A. Körs, D. Vieregge, and M. von der Lippe. Münster: Waxmann.
Stables, A. 2014. The Semiotics of Organisational Landscape. School as Design. In Edusemiotics. Semiotic Philosophy as Educational Foundation, ed. A. Stables and I. Semetsky. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liljestrand, J. (2019). Concluding Chapter: Imagined Meaning, Embodied Meaning, Contested Meaning. In: Ipgrave, J. (eds) Interreligious Engagement in Urban Spaces. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16796-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16796-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16795-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16796-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)