Abstract
As evidenced by textbook definitions and descriptions, modern academic psychology emphasizes the empirical side of the field, that is the experimental and data driven analysis that allow one to generate knowledge claims. Although empirical methods and data are central to the scientific enterprise, so too is the broad conceptual system and vocabulary employed to understand the data and draw conclusions from the experimental enterprise. Indeed, a major and longstanding critique of psychology is that it does not have a conceptual system for defining its key terms (i.e., behavior, mind, and consciousness). This chapter advances theoretical psychology by introducing a continuum of analysis that stretches from the empirical through theoretical explanations into the major paradigms and then into meta-theoretical and finally metaphysical systems that provide the foundational concepts and categories. The argument made is that the field of psychology has struggled since its inception because it has lacked an effective metaphysical system to define its subject matter. The Tree of Knowledge System provides a framework that can serve as that metatheoretical system and be used to bridge the science of psychology to the practice of psychotherapy. As such, it offers a “Metaphysical Empirical” vision for the field.
Book chapter for Re-Envisioning Theoretical Psychology
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ambrosio, F., & Lanzialo, E. (2013). Measuring the horizon: Objectivity, subjectivity and the dignity of human personal identity. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2013.34A006
Anchin, J. C. (2008). The critical role of the dialectic in viable metatheory: A commentary on Henriques’ tree of knowledge system for integrating human knowledge. Theory & Psychology, 18, 801–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308097258
Baars, B. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. NY: Guilford Press. ISBN 0-89862-912-8.
Chaisson, E. J. (2001). Cosmic evolution: The rise of complexity in nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Costa Jr., P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Duhigg, C. (2012). The power of habit: Why we do what we do in life and business. New York: Random House.
Gantt, E., & Williams, R. (2014). Psychology and the legacy of Newtonianism: Motivation, intentionality, and the ontological gap. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(2), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031587
Giddens, A. (1987). Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Greenberg, L. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hart, J. (2014). Toward an integrative theory of psychological defense. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(1), 19–39.
Henriques, G. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson’s consilience with the tree of knowledge system. Theory and Psychology, 18, 731–755.
Henriques, G. (2013). Evolving from methodological to conceptual unification. Review of General Psychology, 17, 168–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032929
Henriques, G. R. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification of psychology. Review of General Psychology, 7, 150–182.
Henriques, G. R. (2004). Psychology defined. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1207–1221.
Henriques, G. R. (2005). Toward a useful mass movement. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 121–139.
Henriques, G. R. (2011). A new unified theory of psychology. New York: Springer.
Henriques, G. R. (2017). Character Adaptation Systems Theory: A new big five for personality and psychotherapy. Review of General Psychology, 21, 9–22.
Henriques, G. R., Kleinman, K., & Asselin, C. (2014). The nested model of well-being: A unified approach. Review of General Psychology, 18, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036288
Henriques, G. R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Unified professional psychology: Implications for combined-integrated doctoral training programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 1051–1063.
Koch, S. (1993). “Psychology” or “the psychological studies”? American Psychologist, 48, 902–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.8.902
Koons, R. C., & Pickavance, T. H. (2014). Metaphysics: The fundamentals. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
Magnavita, J. J. (2008). Psychoanalytic psychotherapy. In J. L. Lebow (Ed.), Twenty-first century psychotherapies (pp. 206–236). New York: Wiley.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
Myers, D., & DeWall, C. N. (2016). Exploring psychology (10th ed.). New York: Macmillan Worth Publishers.
Ossorio, P. G. (2006). The behavior of persons. The collected works of P. G. Ossorio, Vol. V. Ann Arbor, MI: Descriptive Psychology Press.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses: A study of evidence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Slife, B., & Williams, R. (1997). Toward a theoretical psychology: Should a subdiscipline be formally recognized? American Psychologist, 52, 117–129.
Smolin, L. (2001). Three roads to quantum gravity. New York: Basic Books.
Stanovich, K. (2012). How to think straight about psychology (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Henriques, G. (2019). Toward a Metaphysical Empirical Psychology. In: Teo, T. (eds) Re-envisioning Theoretical Psychology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16762-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16761-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16762-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)