Skip to main content

Family Members Becoming Allies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Queer Families in Hungary

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

  • 332 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout this book, we have escorted family members on the path of integrating their non-heterosexual kin into their family, from the family member’s coming out through their handling of the stigma that falls on the non-heterosexual person as well as themselves, to a reconfiguration of family practices in a way to include the same-sex couple. From my fieldwork it transpires, however, that some family members go even further: they realize the plight of not only their own non-heterosexual child, sibling, or other relative, but of LGBTQ people in general. They become allies to the LGBTQ cause by speaking up for LGBTQ people or joining their friendship or activist networks. Eventually, some of them re-evaluate and change their own perceptions of kinship and this way they queer the (mostly) heterosexual family. They will be the focus of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indeed, activists from Western Europe are sometimes surprised at how many self-identified heterosexuals take up important positions in LGBTQ organizations in Hungary. This is probably partly due to the fact that there is no activist group specifically for allies, as will be discussed below.

  2. 2.

    The formerly existing organization PFLAG was a group of LGBT activists with no effort to involve parents and friends. As mentioned above, a Facebook group for parents and family of LGBTQ started toward the end of my fieldwork; it does exhibit some of the activist tendencies of PFLAG, for instance visible presence at pride marches, which the former parents’ group did not do.

  3. 3.

    As discussed above, this section on the website was created with the explicit goal of helping people to come out, so these stories may be seen as reiterations of a community norm.

  4. 4.

    Directed by Russell Mulcahy in 2009 and based on a true story, this film tells about how an originally homophobic, deeply religious mother came round to accept her gay son after his suicide. Its typical Hollywood melodrama style seems to register well with the age group of most of my interviewees’ parents (40 and older), and it is also frequently used by activists (e.g., in the school project coordinated by organizations Labrisz and Szimpozion) to discuss parental acceptance and the attitude of Christians to LGBTQ people.

  5. 5.

    On internet forums, incorrect spelling is often intentional, sometimes a ‘trademark’ of a given poster; Quasimodo is one of these. I tried to convey this by adopting incorrect spelling in my English translation.

  6. 6.

    See Chapter 1 for a discussion of such tendencies in the Hungarian LGBTQ community.

  7. 7.

    That is, their own intimate citizenship in addition to that of LGBTQ people.

  8. 8.

    An excellent example of how school education, allegedly devoid of sexuality, is in fact highly sexualized (Pascoe 2007).

  9. 9.

    There was virtually no violence in 2016 and 2017; in 2018, violent protesters were kept away from the march, and only some silent counterdemonstrators got into the ranks of the marchers. The 2019 march was virtually undisturbed by protesters, though an extreme right-wing group staged violent protests against several pride workshops (in particular those focusing on education, immigrants or Christianity).

  10. 10.

    For a detailed analysis of pride marches and counter-protests in Budapest, see Renkin (2009).

  11. 11.

    Later Zsófi and Emma separated, as we will see in the next section.

  12. 12.

    Hungarian, like many other languages (e.g., Spanish), has a formal and an informal way of addressing people in the second person singular; it is not usual to use the informal address toward a person considerably older than oneself, unless s/he is a member of one’s nuclear family or a close friend, though this varies, e.g., within the LGBTQ community the formal address is virtually never used.

  13. 13.

    Although in some cases it transpired that the non-heterosexual person does have ‘chosen kin’ but s/he did not mention them at the beginning, possibly because in the Hungarian LGBTQ community ‘family’ tends to mean one’s family of origin (often even excluding one’s partner).

  14. 14.

    Fogadott,’ in contrast to legally adopted (‘örökbe fogadott’), means a person has become included in one’s family in a given kinship position, without any legal ties (like Dia in Böske’s kinship network). As English has no term for this, I will use ‘adopted’ in quotation marks when I talk about such informal ‘adoption.’

  15. 15.

    Another lesbian birth mother, Judit, suggested that her partner’s parents may only consider the couple’s child their grandson because they do not have a biological one; Böske is in the same situation, though we do not know whether it influences her relationship to Lili.

  16. 16.

    This sentence might be ironical, or Miklós might be worried about his mother’s safety due to violent attacks on pride marches in Hungary since 2007 (see above).

Bibliography

  • Allport, Gordon. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariés, Philippe. 1962. Centuries of Childhood: A Social History of Family Life. Toronto and London: Jonathan Cape Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Marlon M. 2013. Butch Queens Up in Pumps: Gender, Performance, and Ballroom Culture in Detroit. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David, and Jon Binnie. 2000. The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2007. Values Reflected in Style in a Lesbian Community in Budapest. In Beyond the Pink Curtain, ed. Roman Kuhar and Judit Takács, 81–94. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2012. Szivárványcsaládok a magyar oktatásban [Rainbow Families in Hungarian Education]. In Új kutatások a neveléstudományokban. A munka és a nevelés világa a tudományban [New Research in Pedagogy: The World of Work and Education in Science], ed. Tamás Kozma and István Perjés, 491–508. Budapest: MTA Pedagógiai Tudományos Bizottság – ELTE Eötvös Kiadó, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertone, Chiara, and Marina Franchi. 2008. Research Report: The Experiences of Family Members of Gay and Lesbian Young People in Italy. In Family Matters: Supporting Families to Prevent Violence Against Gay and Lesbian Youth, ed. Chiara Bertone and Marina Franchi, Conference Proceedings, European Conference, Florence, 20–21 June 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, K.L. 2011. Coming Out for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays: From Support Group Grieving to Love Advocacy. Sexualities 14 (4): 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Gavin. 2007. Autonomy, Affinity and Play in the Spaces of Radical Queer Activism. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, ed. Kath Browne, Jason Lim, and Gavin Brown, 195–206. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Katherine McFarland. 2016. Pride Parades: How a Parade Changed the World. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadoret, Anne. 2009. The Contribution of Homoparental Families to the Current Debate on Kinship. In European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology, ed. Jeanette Edwards and Charles Salazar, 79–96. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellato, Valeria, and Tiziana Manganella. 2014. Sexual Citizenship in Private and Public Space: Parents of Gay Men and Lesbians Discuss Their Experiences of Pride Parades. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Mark E. 2007. The Queer Unwanted and Their Undesirable ‘Otherness’. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, ed. Kath Browne, Jason Lim, and Gavin Brown, 125–135. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Leonardo, Micaela. 1992. The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families and the Work of Kinship. In Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. Barrie Thorne and Marilyn Yalom, 246–261. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombos, Tamás, Takács Judit, P. Tóth Tamás, and Mocsonaki László. 2011. Az LMBT emberek magyarországi helyzetének rövid áttekintése [A Short Overview of the Situation of LGBT People in Hungary]. In Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary], ed. Judit Takács, 35–54. Budapest: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Chesne, Louise, and Ben Bradley. 2007. The Subjective Experience of the Lesbian (M)other: An Exploration of the Construction of Lesbian Maternal Identity. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review 3 (1): 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenborg, Emil. 2017. Politics of Visibility and Belonging: From Russia’s “Homosexual Propaganda” Laws to the Ukraine War. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Jeanette. 2000. Born and Bred: Idioms of Kinship and New Reproductive Technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fee, Dwight. 2006. Covenant Marriage: Reflexivity and Retrenchment in the Politics of Intimacy. In Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays and Interviews, ed. Steven Seidman, Nancy Fischer, and Chet Meeks, 430–436. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, Valerie Q. 2014. “We Are with Family”: Black Lesbian Couples Negotiate Rituals with Extended Families. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradskova, Yulia. 2012. “Supporting Genuine Development of the Child”: Public Childcare Centers Versus Family in Post-Soviet Russia. In And They Lived Happily Ever After. Norms and Everyday Practices of Family and Parenthood in Russia and Eastern Europe, ed. Helene Carlbäck, Yulia Gradskova, and Zhanna Kravchenko, 165–184. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Agnieszka. 2006. We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland. Signs 32 (2): 434–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Martine. 2011. Grandparenting in French Lesbian and Gay Families. In Doing Families: Gay and Lesbian Family Practices, ed. J. Takács and R. Kuhar, 117–134. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1998. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, Dan. 2018. Russian Homophobia from Stalin to Sochi. London, Oxford, New York, New Delhi, and Sydney: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, Gilbert, and Bruce Koff. 2000. Something to Tell You: The Road Families Travel When a Child Is Gay. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John Lawrence. 1991. What Does It Mean To Be a “Parent”? The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights. New York University Law Review 66 (353): 147–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imre, Anikó. 2013. Global Popular Media and the Local Limits of Queering. In Queer Visibility in Post-socialist Cultures, ed. Nárcisz Fejes and Andrea P. Balogh. Chicago: Intellect, the University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. Patrick. 2004. Mother Knows Best: Black Gay Vernacular and Transgressive Domestic Space. In Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, ed. William L. Leap and Tom Boellstorff, 251–278. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Lynda, and Robyn Longhurst. 2010. Space, Place, and Sex: Geographies of Sexualities. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, and Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapitány, Ágnes, and Gábor Kapitány. 2007. Túlélési stratégiák. Társadalmi adaptációs módok [Survival Strategies: Social Methods of Adaptation]. Budapest: Kossuth Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz Rothman, Barbara. 2000 [1989]. Recreating Motherhood. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligman, Gail. 1998. The Politics of Duplicity: Controlling Reproduction in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko, Zhanna. 2012. Everyday Continuity and Change: Family and Family Policy in Russia. In And They Lived Happily Ever After: Norms and Everyday Practices of Family and Parenthood in Russia and Eastern Europe, ed. Helene Carlbäck, Yulia Gradskova, and Zhanna Kravchenko, 185–206. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, Roman. 2007. The Family Secret: Parents of Homosexual Sons and Daughters. In Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe, ed. Roman Kuhar and Judit Takács, 35–48. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, Roman. 2011. The Heteronormative Panopticon and the Transparent Closet of the Public Space in Slovenia. In De-centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, ed. Kulpa, Robert and Joanna Mizielińska, 149–166. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuosmanen, Paula, and Juha Jämsä. 2007. Suomalaiset sateenkaariperheet sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa ja koulussa [Finnish Rainbow Families in Social and Health Services and School]. Helsinki: Edita Prima Oy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Thomas W. 1992. The Facts of Fatherhood. In Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. Barrie Thorne and Marilyn Yalom, 155–175. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Ellen. 1993. Lesbian Mothers: Accounts of Gender in American Culture. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Ellen. 1998. Recognizing Ourselves: Ceremonies of Lesbian and Gay Commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Ellen. 2009. Gay Fatherhood: Narratives of Family and Citizenship in America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Houndmills and London: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Daniel. 2016. Queer Reparations: Dialogue and the Queer Past of Schooling. In The Cultural Politics of Queer Theory in Education Research, ed. Christina Gowlett and Mary Lou Rasmussen, 17–30. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matejskova, Tatjana. 2007. Straights in a Gay Bar: Negotiating Boundaries Through Time-Spaces. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, ed. Kath Browne, Jason Lim, and Gavin Brown, 137–150. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, Bill. 1996. The Land, the Law and Legitimate Children: Thinking Through Gender, Kinship and Nation in the British Virgin Islands. In Gender, Kinship and Power: A Comparative and Interdisciplinary History, ed. Mary Jo Maynes, Ann Waltner, Birgitte Soland, and Ulrike Strasser, 351–364. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, Robert. 2006. Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizielińska, Joanna, Marta Abramovicz, and Agata Stasińska. 2015. Families of Choice in Poland: Family Life of Non-heterosexual People. Warsaw: Institut Psychologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David H.J. 1999. Risk and Family Practices: Accounting for Change and Fluidity in Family Life. In The New Family?, ed. Elizabeth B. Silva and Carol Smart, 13–30. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, George L. 1985. Nationalism and Sexuality: Middle-Class Morality and Sexual Norms in Modern Europe. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, David A.B. 2009. Introduction. In Homophobias: Lust and Loathing Across Time and Space, ed. David A.B. Murray, 1–18. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C.J. 2007. Dude, You’re a Fag: Masculinity and Sexuality in High School. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittaway, Mark. 2002. Retreat from Collective Protest: Household, Gender, Work and Popular Opposition in Stalinist Hungary. In Rebellious Families: Household Strategies and Collective Action in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, ed. Jan Kok, 199–230. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Brian, Catherine Bolzendahl, Claudia Geist, and Lala Carr Steelman. 2010. Counted Out: Same-Sex Relations and Americans’ Definitions of Family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rédai, Dorottya. 2015. Sexing the School: Constituting Gender, Ethnicity and Class Through Discourses of Sexuality in a Hungarian Secondary School. Doctoral dissertation, Central European University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkin, Hadley Z. 2009. Homophobia and Queer Belonging in Hungary. Focaal—European Journal of Anthropology 53: 20–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkin, Hadley Z. 2015. Perverse Frictions: Pride, Dignity, and the Budapest LGBT March. Ethnos 80 (3): 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, David A.J. 1999. Identity and the Case for Gay Rights: Race, Gender and Religion as Analogies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Diane. 2005. Claiming Citizenship? Sexuality, Citizenship and Lesbian Feminist Theory. In Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise, and the Paradox of Heterosexuality, ed. Chrys Ingraham, 63–84. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Diane, and Surya Monro. 2012. Sexuality, Equality and Diversity. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, David. 1968. American Kinship: A Cultural Account. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuck, Peter H. 2002. Liberal Citizenship. In Handbook of Citizenship Studies, ed. Engin F. Isin and Bryan S. Turner, 131–144. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self and Culture. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Carol. 1999. The ‘New’ Parenthood: Fathers and Mothers after Divorce. In The New Family?, ed. Elizabeth B. Silva and Carol Smart, 100–114. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somlai, Péter. 2002. Húsz év. Családi kapcsolatok változásai a 20. század végi Magyarországon [Twenty Years: Changes in Family Relationships in late-20th Century Hungary]. Budapest: Új Mandátum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith. 1990. Brave New Families: Stories of Domestic Upheaval in Late Twentieth Century America. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, Judith. 1996. In the Name of the Family: Rethinking Family Values in the Postmodern Age. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, Carol. 1974. All Our Kin. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, Carol, and Linda M. Burton. 1994. Kinscripts: Reflections on Family, Generation, and Culture. In Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, ed. Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey, 33–44. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szalma, Ivett, and Judit Takács. 2015. Who Remains Childless? Unrealised Fertility Plans in Hungary. Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 51 (6): 1047–1075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tereskinas, Arturas. 2008. Lithuanian Gays and Lesbians “Coming Out” in the Public/Private Divide: Sexual Citizenship Lithuanian Style. In Gender and Citizenship in a Multicultural Context, ed. Oleksy, Pető and Waaldijk, 93–108. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varsa, Eszter. 2014. Gyermekvédelem a korai szocialista Magyarországon a társadalmi nemi és etnikai különbségek tükrében [Child Protection in Early State Socialist Hungary from the Perspective of Gender and Ethnic Difference]. Replika 1–2 (85–86): 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1995. Forever Is a Long Time: Romancing the Real in Gay Kinship Ideologies. In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Sylvia Yanagisako and Carol Delaney, 87–110. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1996. Render Me, Gender Me. Lesbians Talk Sex, Class, Color, Nation, Studmuffins. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, Mary F. 2004. This Is Our Family: Stepfamilies, Rituals, and Kinship Connections. In We Are What We Celebrate: Understanding Holidays and Rituals, ed. Amitai Etzioni and Jared Bloom, 74–88. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino, Kenji. 2007. Covering: The Hidden Assault on Our Civil Rights. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1997. Gender and Nation. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, and Singapore: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Béres-Deák, R. (2020). Family Members Becoming Allies. In: Queer Families in Hungary . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16319-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16319-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16318-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16319-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics