Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Queer Families in Hungary

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

  • 362 Accesses

Abstract

In this first chapter of the book ‘Queer Families in Hungary,’ I set the framework for my book. In terms of theory, I address the notion of intimate citizenship, especially as it relates to kinship and agency. Then I describe the community where I did research, also addressing the groups underrepresented in this community and my research. I will also address issues of ethics and positionality in the case of an LGBTQ activist studying a relatively closeted community in a homophobic national context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An island on the river Danube in the center of Budapest, a popular public park.

  2. 2.

    See more on the choice of terminology at the end of this chapter.

  3. 3.

    Originally, the name of FIDESZ was short for Fiatal Demokraták Szövetsége, the Association of Young Democrats, and it was the most liberal party around the fall of the iron curtain. Being no longer young or democrats, they now refuse this title and choose not to explain the acronym.

  4. 4.

    Though arguably the notion that ‘we’ are the ‘defenders of civilization’ has strong historical roots in this region and was present in nationalist discourses already during state socialism (Verdery 1991), with reference to the ‘West’ in general rather than the EU.

  5. 5.

    The term ‘social parent’ is usually applied to a primary caregiver who is not a biological or legal parent to the child (more about this in Chapter 3); ‘social grandparents’ are this person’s parents (Gross 2011).

  6. 6.

    I am grateful to Roman Kuhar for this insight.

  7. 7.

    Even if such laws are rarely enacted, the state may rely on them any time it feels itself threatened or needs a scapegoat (Dave 2012); queer activists in such countries who argue that a fight for decriminalization would be assimilationist (see Dasgupta and DasGupta 2018; Dave 2012) ignore that the prohibition of homosexuality, if enforced, forecloses not only assimilation and recognition but any kind of visible queer existence.

  8. 8.

    Natália Szenteh, who also compiled an interview volume with parents of gays and lesbians (Szenteh 2005), operated a telephone helpline for parents and had personal meetings with them, but her efforts to organize regular group meetings failed. After my actual fieldwork was completed, a Facebook group for family members of LGBTQ people started, but I did not include them in my study.

  9. 9.

    The acronym LGBTQ means ‘lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer.’ Though recently many activist organizations add the letters A (asexual) and I (intersex), this is often more an empty gesture than the incorporation of the specific needs and experiences of these groups (Butterfield 2013). During my fieldwork, asexual and intersex people were practically invisible in Hungary, including in the LGBTQ scene; therefore, I decided against adding their letters to the acronym I use. (The situation is still not much better with regard to intersex; the Hungarian Asexual Association was founded in 2019.) Though (for reasons discussed below) I did not interview trans* people, they did contribute to the production of community discourses at workshops and in online spaces, so I felt the use of the acronym ‘LGBTQ’ appropriate when referring to the community as a whole.

  10. 10.

    Weston’s work is limited to these two groups.

  11. 11.

    In queer theory, ‘identity’ has been criticized as too monolithic and essentialist (e.g., Jagose 1996) and ‘subjectivity’ is often used instead. While this is justified when writing about cultures or ages with no communities based on sexual object choice (e.g., Blackwood 2011; Halperin 2002), I believe ‘subjectivity’ is too individualistic a term, focusing more on the individual’s self-perception or taste (Halperin 2012) than on belonging to and/or identification with a specific community, which is my research area. It is important to note, however, that I use the term ‘identity’ in a soft, more fluid sense (Brubaker and Cooper 2000) and do not wish to suggest that it is in any way inborn or immutable.

  12. 12.

    Communitas, as Turner describes it, is not a permanent phenomenon but is connected to temporary situations like initiation rites, while the rest of the time people are expected to act out given societal roles. Narratives of LGBTQ people, however, often describe the LGBTQ community as a place where they can ‘be themselves’ all the time, as opposed to the hostile heterosexual world (e.g., Bailey 2013; Weston 1991).

  13. 13.

    MSM (men who have sex with men) is a term originating from HIV/AIDS activism to refer to men who engage in same-sex activities but do not necessarily adopt a sexual identity reflecting this practice. Here I denote with this term all men who are completely or partly same-sex oriented, in order to avoid assigning to them identities they may not claim.

  14. 14.

    There was a short-lived attempt to create a women-only bar in the mid-2000s, but it closed down soon; one reason was financial difficulties, the other harrassment by heterosexual men, who repeatedly tried to get in and conflicts with them drove away many of the patrons. This example shows that in Hungarian society, permeated with sexism and the advocation of traditional gender roles (including by nationalist politics, see Chapter 2), allegedly ‘safe spaces’ for women may not be safe at all.

  15. 15.

    Mások, the longest-lived gay and lesbian magazine, was much cheaper in quality and focused on providing information; this and its cheap production costs (the editors and the contributors all worked for free) enabled it to exist from 1990 to 2008, when the internet became the primary source of information for younger LGBTQ. (This resulted in the further exclusion of the elderly non-computer-literate, who still lament the lack of a printed gay magazine.)

  16. 16.

    This, incidentally, is true for most catering venues in the center of Budapest.

  17. 17.

    This will be discussed in Chapter 6.

  18. 18.

    And sometimes even subcultural ones: in several instances, same-sex couples have been asked in gay bars not to show too much affection, as it might drive away heterosexual patrons.

  19. 19.

    Recently, an initiative ‘We Are Open’ was launched by some (usually multinational or gay-owned) companies, but this is mostly limited to their presence at pride marches and does not involve openly targeting LGBTQ people in their general advertising. In a context of state homophobia this is hardly surprising: as this book is being prepared for publication, outrage was created among conservative politicians and Christian denominations by a poster campaign of Coca-Cola featuring same-sex couples, with right-wing public figures calling for a boycott on Coca-Cola products and the mayor of Budapest planning to ban the poster campaign.

  20. 20.

    A community-building project (headed by a Budapest-based organization), which resulted in the formation of some rural LGBTQ organizations, started toward the end of my fieldwork.

  21. 21.

    We must be aware, however, that rural to urban migration is also fueled by the lack of work opportunities in the countryside and is characteristic of younger generations of any sexual orientation or gender identity.

  22. 22.

    1 Euro = about 300 HUF (210 USD). This price is less than 1/3 of what a soft drink would cost in an average bar in Budapest.

  23. 23.

    A poignant example for this took place in a reading group, where some university educated queer-identified women persisted in using expert language and eventually drove most working-class participants away—ironically after they (the women) had declared that women can never be oppressors due to the prevailing gender order.

  24. 24.

    Of course, middle-class participants who wish to discuss their personal issues may feel the same disappointment, but at least understand the presentation.

  25. 25.

    A short-lived initiative, called Queer New Wave (Buzi Új Hullám), did try to address issues of class, but from an explicitly middle-class position: all its members were university educated, and their ideas of addressing class were charity-based, like distributing food for the homeless, which reinforces rather than dismantles class hierarchies.

  26. 26.

    Háttér uses this acronym; my reason for not including the letter ‘I’ with reference to my fieldwork is mentioned above.

  27. 27.

    Indeed, at the time of my writing, of all the Hungarian LGBTQ organizations its events have the highest diversity in terms of non-binary, trans* and asexual presence and topics, as well as the highest awareness of intersectional oppression.

  28. 28.

    Inter Alia ceased to function in 2012, though its website was available for some more years (Bea Sándor, personal communication). The Foundation for Rainbow Families officially still exists, but as two of its three founders have moved abroad, its activities are mostly constrained to online help.

  29. 29.

    Since the end of my fieldwork, the pride.hu website disappeared, then restarted under a different name (pridekozosseg.hu), but the old forum threads can no longer be retrieved.

  30. 30.

    Unfortunately, shortly after I started my research, the melegvagyok.hu website was hacked; the organization started a new website, but without the forums. Therefore, I only had access to one forum thread, focusing on coming out, that I had managed to copy into a file.

  31. 31.

    Which is not to say that there are no rules and taboos in online communities (Csáji 2015; Gatson 2011; Wellman and Gulia 1999).

  32. 32.

    Trolls are people who attempt to pass as legitimate participants of a forum or other internet group but cause disruption by disseminating bad advice or attacking other posters (Donath 1999). While Donath suggests that trolls only assume the identity on which the group is based, on pride.hu I witnessed trolling by self-proclaimed LGBTQ people, especially concerning arguments they strongly disagree with. Flaming is aggressively attacking another user (Donath 1999).

  33. 33.

    Naturally, there are less public sites of communication on the internet, like closed Facebook groups or Skype calls between group members (Csáji 2015), but I did not examine these.

  34. 34.

    Bisexual, transgender, and queer people are not even mentioned in either volume.

  35. 35.

    The oral history project continued with gay men and yielded the book and film Hot men, cold dictatorships (Hanzli et al. 2015); however, as it was published years after my fieldwork, I had no opportunity to analyze it in detail and will only make sporadic references to it.

  36. 36.

    In summer 2019 the government did suggest a modification of the law to ban adoption by gays and lesbians, but no bill has been presented to the Parliament yet.

  37. 37.

    Háttér Legal Aid, besides its advocacy and legal counseling work, also hold trainings and workshops to raise the legal awareness of the LGBTQ community; I participated in such workshops and Tamás Dombos also provided me with training materials.

  38. 38.

    I do discuss a case where the partner was not cisgender in Béres-Deák (2015).

  39. 39.

    This also reproduces community tendencies, as at the time of my fieldwork Roma members usually did not talk about their background. From 2018, one has been able to observe a higher visibility of Roma LGBTQ (especially gay men) in Hungary, including some research projects exploring their experiences.

  40. 40.

    Except one person’s experience of adopting a Roma child, see Chapter 3.

  41. 41.

    A middle-aged gay friend’s email sums up the situation in a funny way: ‘I’d participate in your study, but by the time I wake up in the morning, my same-sex relationships always disappear! .’

  42. 42.

    In a journal article, I described the story of a woman who, after participating in a legal awareness workshop, started legal action against discrimination, as an illustration to how non-activists also rely on the legal framework. The anonymous reviewer commented that the heroine of my story was indeed an activist, after all, she had taken part in an event organized by an LGBTQ organization.

  43. 43.

    Though Newton (1993) used the real names of her gay and lesbian interlocutors, it must be remembered that these were openly out people in high-class positions, who had less to lose by being identified.

  44. 44.

    I consciously made no attempt to trace forum posters’ offline identity.

  45. 45.

    Apparently, these are the disciplines where Hungarian universities allow research in such topics, and also where it is easy to study them without actually having to meet LGBTQ people in person, e.g., through online questionnaires. Such surveys are often shared on forums and mailing lists, and in most cases harshly criticized for their cisnormativity and lack of background knowledge.

  46. 46.

    I do not think people outside the community would recognize me, but as we will see below, the closet is sometimes associated with an irrational amount of fear; there have been people (not potential interviewees) who were reluctant to appear in my company in public space.

  47. 47.

    Indeed, in the interviews I had to paraphrase the question about discourses, because even university-educated interlocutors were unfamiliar with the term.

Bibliography

  • Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. Writing Against Culture. In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, ed. Richard G. Fox, 137–162. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ámon, Katalin. 2019. Revanchism and Anti-revanchism in Hungary: The Dynamics of (De)Politicisation and the Criminalisation of Homelessness. In Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe: Governance, Resistance and Anti-politics, ed. Jim Buller, Pınar E. Dönmez, Adam Standring, and Matthew Wood, 209–236. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asad, Talal. 1986. The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, ed. James Clifford and George E. Marcus, 141–164. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, Marlon M. 2013. Butch Queens Up in Pumps: Gender, Performance, and Ballroom Culture in Detroit. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bakó, Boglárka. 2008. Zsuzska, a rossz. Cigány női normák egy erdélyi kis közösségben [Zsuzska, the Bad One: Norms for Gypsy Women in a Transsylvanian Small Community]. In Határtalan nők. Kizártak és befogadottak a női társadalomban [Women Without Borders: The Included and Excluded in Women’s Society], ed. Boglárka Bakó and Eszter Zsófia Tóth, 129–150. Budapest: Nyitott Könyvműhely.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartha, Eszter. 2011. ‘It Can’t Make Me Happy That Audi Is Prospering’: Working-Class Nationalism in Hungary After 1989. In Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working-Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe, ed. Kalb, Don and Gábor Halmai, 92–112. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, David, and Jon Binnie. 2000. The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2002. Style and Identity in a Lesbian Community in Budapest. MA thesis, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2007. Values Reflected in Style in a Lesbian Community in Budapest. In Beyond the Pink Curtain, ed. Roman Kuhar and Judit Takács, 81–94. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2010. ‘Anyu, Tina a szerelmed?’ Gyereket nevelő azonos nemű párok és az önfelvállalás [‘Mum, Is Tina Your Beloved?’ Same-Sex Couples Raising Children and Coming Out]. Thalassa 4: 85–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2015. Seduced Victims and Irresponsible Mothers: Family Reactions to Female Same-Sex Relationships in Hungary. In Lesbian Geographies: Gender, Place and Power, ed. Kath Browne and Eduarda Ferreira, 29–55. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2016. ‘I’ve Also Lived as a Heterosexual’—Identity Narratives of Formerly Married Middle-Aged Gays and Lesbians in Hungary. Journal of Bisexuality 16 (1): 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béres-Deák, Rita. 2019. Lobbying for Rainbow Families in Hungary: Discourses and Omissions. In LGBTQ+ Activism in Central Eastern Europe, ed. Radzhana Buyantueva and Maryna Shevtsova. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertone, Chiara, and Marina Franchi. 2008. Research Report: The Experiences of Family Members of Gay and Lesbian Young People in Italy. In Family Matters: Supporting Families to Prevent Violence Against Gay and Lesbian Youth, ed. Chiara Bertone and Marina Franchi. Conference Proceedings, European Conference, June 20–21, Florence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilić, B. 2016. Europe ♥ Gays? Europeanisation and Pride Parades in Serbia. In LGBT Activism and Europeanisation in the Post-Yugoslav Space: On the Rainbow Way to Europe, ed. B. Bilić, 117–154. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, Evelyn. 1995. Falling in Love with an-Other Lesbian: Reflections on Identity in Fieldwork. In Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork, ed. Don Kulick and Margaret Willson, 51–75. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwood, Evelyn. 2011. Tombois and Femmes: Defying Gender Labels in Indonesia. Jakarta: The Lontar Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, Tom. 2005. The Gay Archipelago: Sexuality and Nation in Indonesia. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life: An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boellstorff, Tom, Bonnie Nardi, Celia Pearce, and T.L. Taylor. 2012. Ethnography and Virtual Worlds: A Handbook of Method. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boreczky, Ágnes. 2004. A szimbolikus család. Az értelmezés idejének és terének kiterjesztése [Symbolic Family: Extending the Time and Space of Interpretation]. Budapest: Gondolat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgos, Anna. 2011. Diskurzusok a kétanyás családokról: kutatások és közbeszédek [Discourses on Two-Mother Families: Academic and Public]. In Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary], ed. Judit Takács, 80–93. Budapest: L’Harmatta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borland, Katherine. 1991. “That’s Not What I Said”: Interpretive Conflict in Oral Narrative Research. In Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, ed. Sherna Berger Gluck and Daphne Pata, 63–77. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, K.L. 2011. Coming Out for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays: From Support Group Grieving to Love Advocacy. Sexualities 14 (4): 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromseth, Janne. 2015. Äldre lesbiska, bisexuella och trans-feministers berättelser om vänskap och lesbisk feministisk gemenskap över tid och rum [Stories of Elderly Lesbian, Bisexual and Trans Feminists About Friendship and Lesbian Feminist Community Over Time and Space]. Lambda Nordica 4 (20): 45–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Gavin. 2007. Autonomy, Affinity and Play in the Spaces of Radical Queer Activism. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, ed. Kath Browne, Jason Lim, and Gavin Brown, 195–206. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, Rogers, and Frederick Cooper. 2000. Beyond ‘Identity’. Theory and Society 29: 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, Katherine McFarland. 2016. Pride Parades: How a Parade Changed the World. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2000. Antigone’s Claim: Kinship Between Life and Death. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, Nicole. 2013. LGBTIQ Advocacy at the Intersection of Transnational and Local Discourses on Human Rights and Citizenship in Croatia. PhD thesis, Central European University, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canaday, Margot. 2009. The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappellato, Valeria, and Tiziana Manganella. 2014. Sexual Citizenship in Private and Public Space: Parents of Gay Men and Lesbians Discuss Their Experiences of Pride Parades. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 211–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, Mark E. 2007. The Queer Unwanted and Their Undesirable ‘Otherness’. In Geographies of Sexualities: Theory, Practices and Politics, ed. Kath Browne, Jason Lim, and Gavin Brown, 125–135. Aldershot and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateauvert, Melinda. 2008. Framing Sexual Citizenship: Reconsidering the Discourse on African American Families. The Journal of African American History 93 (2): 198–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Danae. 1993. Commodity Lesbianism. In The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader, ed. Henry Abelove, Michele Aina Barale, and David M. Halperin, 186–202. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossman, Brenda. 2007. Sexual Citizens: The Legal and Cultural Regulation of Sex and Belonging. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creed, Gerald W. 2001. Economic Crisis and Ritual Decline in Eastern Europe. In Postsocialism: Ideals, Ideologies and Practices in Eurasia, ed. C.M. Hann, 57–73. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csáji, László Koppány. 2015. Csoda, pokoljárás és digitális szakadék. Egy új vallási mozgalom legitimációs technikái a webes és weben kívüli diskurzusaiban [Miracles, Traveling to Hell and the Digital Gap: The Legitimation Techniques of a New Religious Movement in Its Discourses on and Outside the Web]. In Replika 90–91, pp. 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ulrika. 2011. Notes on Femme-inist Agency. In Sexuality, Gender and Power: Intersectional and Transnational Perspectives, ed. Anna G. Jónasdottir, Valerie Bryson, and Kathleen B. Jones, 172–188. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Rohit K., and Debanuj DasGupta. 2018. Introduction: Queering Digital India. In Queering Digital India: Activisms, Identities, Subjectivities, ed. Rohit K. Dasgupta and Debanuj DasGupta, 1–28. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dave, Naisargi N. 2012. Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Peter. 1992. The Role of Disclosure in Coming Out Among Gay Men. In Modern Homosexualities: Fragments of Lesbian and Gay Experience, ed. Ken Plummer, 75–86. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel. 1988. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, Norman K. 2003. Performance Ethnography: Critical Pedagogy and the Politics of Culture. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Leonardo, Micaela. 1992. The Female World of Cards and Holidays: Women, Families and the Work of Kinship. In Rethinking the Family: Some Feminist Questions, ed. Barrie Thorne and Marilyn Yalom, 246–261. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobó, Mátyás. 2006. Blogtörténelem [A History of Blogging]. In Blogvilág. Egy műfaj születése [The World of Blogs: The Birth of a Genre], ed. Bőge et al., 25–39. Budapest: HVG Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolgin, Janet L. 1995. Family Law and the Facts of Family. In Naturalizing Power: Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, ed. Sylvia Yanagisako and Carol Delaney, 47–68. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombos, Tamás, Judit Takács, Tamás P. Tóth, László Mocsonaki. 2011. Az LMBT emberek magyarországi helyzetének rövid áttekintése [A Short Overview of the Situation of LGBT People in Hungary]. In Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary], ed. Judit Takács, 35–54. Budapest: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donath, Judith S. 1999. Identity and Deception in the Virtual Community. In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. Marc A. Smith and Peter Kollock, 29–59. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, Mitchell. 1999. Sidewalk. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenborg, Emil. 2017. Politics of Visibility and Belonging: From Russia’s “Homosexual Propaganda” Laws to the Ukraine War. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Jeanette, and Marilyn Strathern. 2000. Including Our Own. In Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, ed. Janet Carsten, 149–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erel, Umut, Jin Haritaworn, Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez, and Christian Klesse. 2011. On the Depoliticization of Intersectionality Talk: Conceptualising Multiple Oppressions in Critical Sexuality Studies. In Theorizing Intersectionality and Sexuality, ed. Yvette Taylor, Sally Hines, and Mark E. Casey, 56–77. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esterberg, Kristin G. 1997. Lesbian and Bisexual Identities: Constructing Communities, Constructing Selves. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David T. 1993. Sexual Citizenship: The Material Construction of Sexualities. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fee, Dwight. 2006. Covenant Marriage: Reflexivity and Retrenchment in the Politics of Intimacy. In Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays and Interviews, ed. Steven Seidman, Nancy Fischer, and Chet Meeks, 430–436. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fél, Edit, and Tamás Hofer. 1969. Proper Peasants: Traditional Life in a Hungarian Village. New York: Wenner-Green Foundation for Anthropological Research Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch, Janet. 1989. Family Obligations and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, Éva, and Beáta Nagy. 2014. “An Ebbing Tide Lowers All Boats”: How the Great Recession Has Affected Men and Women in Central and Eastern Europe. In European Labour Markets in Crisis: A Gender Perspective. Special issue of Revue del’ OFCE, Debates and Policies 2014/153., ed. Anne Eydoux, Antoine Math, and Hélène Périvier, 121–153. Paris: OFCE.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Marilyn. 2000. Autonomy, Social Disruption, and Women. In Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self, ed. Catriona Mackenzie and Natalie Stoljar, 35–51. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabb, Jacqui. 2010 [2008]. Researching Intimacy in Families. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Angela Cora, Alecea I. Standlee, Jennifer Bechkoff, and Yan Cui. 2009. Ethnographic Approaches to the Internet and Computer-Mediated Communication. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 38 (1): 52–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatson, Sarah N. 2011. The Methods, Politics, and Ethics of Representation in Online Ethnography. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, ed. Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 245–275. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. 1993 [1973]. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, Valerie Q. 2014. “We Are with Family”: Black Lesbian Couples Negotiate Rituals with Extended Families. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1974. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, Agnieszka. 2006. We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland. Signs 32 (2): 434–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafsky, Erica L. 2014. Becoming the Parent of a GLB Son or Daughter. Journal of LGBT Family Studies 10 (1–2): 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Mary L. 2009. Out in the Country: Youth, Media, and Queer Visibility in Rural America. New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, Anikó, and Eszter Kováts. 2018. Nőügyek. Társadalmi problémák és megoldási stratégiák. A kutatási eredmények összefoglalója [Women’s Affairs: Social Problems and Problem-Solving Strategies: A Summary of Research Findings]. Budapest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Martine. 2011. Grandparenting in French Lesbian and Gay Families. In Doing Families: Gay and Lesbian Family Practices, ed. J. Takács and R. Kuhar, 117–134. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, David M. 2002. How to Do the History of Homosexuality. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, David. 2012. How to be Gay? Cambridge and London: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, Lynne. 1999. “But We Are Still Mothers”: Gender, the State, and the Construction of Need in Postsocialist Hungary. In Uncertain Transition. Ethnographies of Change in the Postsocialist World, ed. Michael Burawoy and Katherine Verdery, 151–188. Lanham, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanzli, Péter, Gábor B. Halmai, Ildikó P. Varga, Ágnes Seregély, Judit Gyárfás, and Sándor Nagy (eds.). 2015. Meleg férfiak, hideg diktatúrák [Hot Men, Cold Dictatorships]. Budapest: Civil Művek Közművelődési Egyesület.

    Google Scholar 

  • Háttér Társaság. 2017. Azonos nemű szülők és gyermekeik. Kutatási összefoglaló [Same-Sex Parents and Their Children: Research Summary]. http://hatter.hu/sites/default/files/dokumentum/kiadvany/szivarvanycsaladok2017.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2018.

  • Havas, Gábor, and Ilona Liskó. 2005. Szegregáció a roma tanulók általános iskolai oktatásában [Segregation of Roma students in Primary Schools]. Budapest: Felsőoktatási Kutatóintézet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckert, Jamie. 2010. Intimacy with Strangers/Intimacy with Self: Queer Experiences of Social Research. In Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research, ed. Kath Browne and Catherine J. Nash, 41–55. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, Gilbert. 1994. Guardians of the Flutes: Idioms of Masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, Gilbert, and Jeff Beeler. 1998. Older Gay Men and Lesbians in Families. In Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identities in Families: Psychological Perspectives, ed. Charlotte J. Patterson and Anthony R. D’Augelli, 177–196. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herdt, Gilbert, and Bruce Koff. 2000. Something to Tell You: The Road Families Travel When a Child Is Gay. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, John Lawrence. 1991. What Does It Mean to Be a “Parent”? The Claims of Biology as the Basis for Parental Rights. New York University Law Review 66: 353, May 1991, pp. 147–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, E.G., and R.F. Oswald. 2011. Nonmetropolitan LGBTQ Parents: When and Where Does Their Sexuality Matter? Journal of LGBT Family Studies 7 (5): 436–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, Chrys. 2006. One Is Not Born a Bride: How Weddings Regulate Heterosexuality. In Introducing the New Sexuality Studies: Original Essays and Interviews, ed. Steven Seidman, Nancy Fischer, and Chet Meeks, 197–201. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Stevie. 2005. Sexuality, Heterosexuality and Gender Hierarchy: Getting Our Priorities Straight. In Thinking Straight: The Power, the Promise, and the Paradox of Heterosexuality, ed. Chrys Ingraham, 15–38. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, Annamarie. 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, Lynn, Roona Simpson, and Ruth Lewis. 2011. Introduction. In Researching Families and Relationships: Reflections on Process, ed. Lynn Jamieson, Roona Simpson, and Ruth Lewis, 1–18. New York and Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. Patrick. 2004. Mother Knows Best: Black Gay Vernacular and Transgressive Domestic Space. In Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language, ed. William L. Leap, and Tom Boellstorff, 251–278. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, Danny L. 1989. Participant Observation: A Methodology for Human Studies. Applied Sociology Research Methods Series, vol. 15. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, Don. 2011. Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working-Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe. In Headlines of Nation, Subtexts of Class: Working-Class Populism and the Return of the Repressed in Neoliberal Europe, ed. Don Kalb and Gábor Halmai, 1–37. NewYork and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, Don, and Herman Tak. 2006. The Dynamics of Trust and Mistrust in Poland: Floods, Emotions, Citizenship and the State. In Postsocialism: Politics and Emotions in Central and Eastern Europe, ed. Maruška Svašek, 196–213. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapitány, Ágnes, and Gábor Kapitány. 2007. Túlélési stratégiák. Társadalmi adaptációs módok [Survival Strategies: Social Methods of Adaptation]. Budapest: Kossuth Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Kristin A. 2003. Domestic Violence and the Politics of Privacy. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Elizabeth Lapovsky, and Madeline D. Davis. 1993. Boots of Leather, Slippers of Gold: The History of a Lesbian Community. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, Mary E., and Bernard E. Whitley, Jr. 1998. Do Heterosexual Women and Men Differ in Their Attitudes Toward Homosexuality? A Conceptual and Methodological Analysis. In Stigma and Sexual Orientation: Understanding Prejudice Against Lesbians, Gay Men, and Bisexuals, ed. Gregory M. Herek, 24–38. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kováts, Eszter, and Andrea Pető. 2017. Anti-gender Discourse in Hungary: A Discourse Without a Movement? In Anti-gender Campaigns in Europe. Mobilizing Against Equality, ed. Roman Kuhar and David Paternotte, 117–132. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieger, Susan. 1983. The Mirror Dance: Identity in a Women’s Community. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, Roman. 2007. The Family Secret: Parents of Homosexual Sons and Daughters. In Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe, ed. Roman Kuhar and Judit Takács, 35–48. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhar, Roman. 2011. The Heteronormative Panopticon and the Transparent Closet of the Public Space in Slovenia. In De-centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, ed. Kulpa, Robert and Joanna Mizielińska, 149–166. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulick, Don. 1995. The Sexual Life of Anthropologists: Erotic Subjectivity and Ethnographic Work. In Taboo: Sex, Identity and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork, ed. Don Kulick and Margaret Willson, 1–28. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, Steph, 2000. Mothering the Self: Mothers, Daughters, Subjects. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehotai, Orsolya. 2017. Civic Responsiveness to the Representations of Refugees in the Hungarian Governmental Media: Gendered “Care” and Control. MA thesis, Central European University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Ellen. 1998. Recognizing Ourselves: Ceremonies of Lesbian and Gay Commitment. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, Ellen. 2009. Gay Fatherhood: Narratives of Family and Citizenship in America. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Amy. 2010. Introduction: Development, Global Governance, and Sexual Subjectivities. In Development, Sexual Rights and Global Governance, ed. Amy Lind, 1–21. London and New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques-Periera, Bérengére, and Birte Siim. 2002. Representation, Agency and Empowerment. In Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics, ed. Barbara Hobson and Jane Lewis, 170–194. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, Josie. 2011. Love in the Time of Communism: Intimacy and Sexuality in the GDR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mészáros, György. 2018. Az LMBT+ identitások és mozgalom politikai gazdaságtana a félperiférián [The Political Economy of LGBT+ Identities and Movement on the Semi-Periphery]. Fordulat 2 (24): 215–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizielińska, Joanna, Marta Abramovicz, and Agata Stasińska. 2015. Families of Choice in Poland: Family Life of Non-heterosexual People. Warsaw: Institut Psychologii Polskiej Akademii Nauk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modell, Judith. 1998. Rights to the Children: Foster Care and Social Reproduction in Hawai’i. In Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power, and Technological Innovation, ed. Sarah Franklin and Helena Ragoné, 156–172. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, David H.J. 1996. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, José Esteban. 1999. Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, Lorena. 2010. Brown, Queer and Gendered: Queering the Latina/o ‘Street-Scapes’ in Los Angeles. In Queer Methods and Methodologies: Intersecting Queer Theories and Social Science Research, ed. Kath Browne and Catherine J. Nash, 55–68. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, Eszter, and Júlia Vajda. 2008. “…onnantól kezdve ilyen hivatásos zsidóként működöm” [‘From That Point I Have Been Functioning as Sort of a Professional Jew’]. In Tükörszilánkok. Kádár-korszakok a személyes emlékezetben [Mirror Splinters: Kádár-eras in Personal Memory], ed. Kovács Éva, 110–144. Budapest: MTA Szociológiai Kutatóintézet – 1956-os Intézet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Esther. 1993. Cherry Grove, Fire Island: Sixty Years in America’s First Gay and Lesbian Town. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolae, Lavinia M. 2009. The Marriage Between Kinship and Sexuality in New Mexico’s Domestic Partnership Debate. In Out in Public: Reinventing Lesbian/Gay Anthropology in a Globalizing World, ed. Ellen Lewin and William L. Leap, 338–356. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, Jodi. 1999. Writing in the Body: Gender (Re)Production in Online Interaction. In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. Marc A. Smith and Peter Kollock, 76–106. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oleksy, Elżbieta. 2009. Citizenship Revisited. In Intimate Citizenships: Genders, Sexualities, Politics, ed. Elżbieta H. Oleksy, 1–16. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, Shane. 2001. Sexual Strangers: Gays, Lesbians, and Dilemmas of Citizenship. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, Ken. 1997. Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change and Social Worlds. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, Ken. 2003. Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Brian, Catherine Bolzendahl, Claudia Geist, and Lala Carr Steelman. 2010. Counted Out: Same-Sex Relations and Americans’ Definitions of Family. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, Mary Louise. 1986. Fieldwork in Common Places. In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, ed. James Clifford and George E. Marcus, 27–50. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkin, Hadley Z. 2007a. Predecessors and Pilgrims: Lesbian History-Making and Belonging in Post-socialist Hungary. In Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe, ed. Roman Kuhar and Judit Takács, 269–287. Ljubljana: Mirovni Inštitut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkin, Hadley Z. 2007b. Ambiguous Identities, Ambiguous Transitions: Lesbians, Gays, and the Sexual Politics of Citizenship in Postsocialist Hungary. Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renkin, Hadley Z. 2015. Perverse Frictions: Pride, Dignity, and the Budapest LGBT March. Ethnos 80 (3): 409–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Diane. 2001. Extending Citizenship: Cultural Citizenship and Sexuality. In Culture and Citizenship, ed. Nick Stevenson, 153–166. London, Thousand Oaks, and New Delhi: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rofel, Lisa. 1999. Other Modernities: Gendered Yearnings in China After Socialism. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Carl. 1951. Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Nikolas. 1989. Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London and New York: The Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, Sasha, and Mariya Stoilova. 2011. Heteronormativity, Intimate citizenship and the Regulation of Same-Sex Sexualities in Bulgaria. In De-Centring Western Sexualities: Central and Eastern European Perspectives, ed. Robert Kulpa and Joanna Mizielińska, 167–190. Farnham-Burlington: Ashgate.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 2013. What Kinship Is—And Is Not. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sándor, Beáta (ed.). 2010a. Fehér füzet azonos nemű szülőkről és gyermekeikről [White Book on Same-Sex Parents and Their Children]. Budapest: Inter Alia Alapítvány.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sándor, Beáta (ed.). 2010b. Mi vagyunk a család, a biztonság, az otthona. Leszbikus anyák, meleg apák és ‘pótapák’ [We Are the Family, the Safety, the Home: Lesbian Mothers, Gay Fathers and ‘Substitute Fathers’]. Budapest: Inter Alia Alapítvány.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanford, Victoria. 2006. Introduction. In Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, Activism, ed. Victoria Sanford and Asale Angel-Ajani, 1–18. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiser, Gertraud. 2000. On the Importance of Being the Last One: Inheritance and Marriage in an Austrian Peasant Community. In Dividends of Kinship. Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness, ed. Peter P. Schweitzer, 92–123. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, Beverley. 2004. Class, Self and Culture. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, Monique. 2008. Scholarship, Advocacy, and the Politics of Engagement in Burma (Myanmar). In Engaged Observer: Anthropology, Advocacy, Activism, ed. Victoria Sanford and Asale Angel-Ajani, 42–59. New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spradley, James P. 1980. Participant Observation. Thomson Learning: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, Carol. 1974. All Our Kin. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stack, Carol, and Linda M. Burton. 1994. Kinscripts: Reflections on Family, Generation, and Culture. In Mothering: Ideology, Experience, and Agency, ed. Evelyn Nakano Glenn, Grace Chang, and Linda Rennie Forcey, 33–44. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stella, Francesca. 2015. Lesbian Lives in Soviet and Post-Soviet Russia. Post/Socialism and Gendered Sexualities. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Michael. 1997. The Time of the Gypsies. Oxford and Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout, Noelle M. 2014. After Love: Queer Intimacy and Erotic Economies in Post-Soviet Cuba. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Maureen. 2004. The Family of Woman: Lesbian Mothers, Their Children, and the Undoing of Gender. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szenteh, Natália. 2005. És ha a te gyereked lenne homoszexuális? [And If Your Child Was Homosexual?]. Budapest: Masculus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulc, Lukasz. 2017. Transnational Homosexuals in Communist Poland: Cross-Border Flows in Gay and Lesbian Magazines. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takács, Judit. 2008. Homoszexualitás és társadalom [Homosexuality and Society]. Budapest: Új Mandátum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takács, Judit. 2011. Homofóbia Magyarországon és Európában [Homophobia in Hungary and in Europe]. In Homofóbia Magyarországon [Homophobia in Hungary], szerk Judit Takács, 15–34. Budapest: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takács, Judit, László Mocsonaki, and Tamás P. Tóth. 2008. A meleg, leszbikus, biszexuális és transznemű (LMBT) emberek társadalmi kirekesztettsége Magyarországon [The Social Exclusion of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) People in Hungary]. Esély 3: 16–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tereskinas, Arturas. 2008. Lithuanian Gays and Lesbians “Coming Out” in the Public/Private Divide: Sexual Citizenship Lithuanian Style. In Gender and Citizenship in a Multicultural Context, ed. Oleksy, Pető and Waaldijk, 93–108. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor. 1991 [1969]. The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-structure. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, David. 2007. Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vas, Maya. 2011. Kapcsolatok szivárványa [A Rainbow of Relationships]. Budapest: Jaffa Kiadó.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdery, Katherine. 1991. National Ideology Under Socialism: Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceauşescu’s Romania. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and Oxford: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, Barry, and Milena Gulia. 1999. Virtual Communities as Communities: Net Surfers Don’t Ride Alone. In Communities in Cyberspace, ed. Marc A. Smith and Peter Kollock, 167–194. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1991. Families We Choose: Lesbians, Gays, Kinship. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1996. Render Me, Gender Me: Lesbians Talk Sex, Class, Color, Nation, Studmuffins …. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, Kath. 1998. Longslowburn: Sexuality and Social Science. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Béres-Deák, R. (2020). Introduction. In: Queer Families in Hungary . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16319-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16319-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16318-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16319-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics