Twin Goals and Two Communities: A Behavioural Approach

  • Gert van Dijk
  • Panagiota Sergaki
  • George Baourakis
Part of the Cooperative Management book series (COMA)


Cooperatives are not ideological cliques trying to detach themselves from the world. In simple terms, they are merely associations of people who establish a business to provide themselves with certain services in order to thrive in the global market.


  1. Bijman, J., Muradian, R., & Cechin, A. (2011). Agricultural cooperatives and value chain coordination: Towards an integrated theoretical framework. In B. Helmsing & S. Vellema (Eds.), Value chains, inclusion and endogenous development. Contrasting theories and realities (pp. 82–101). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Cook, M. L., Iliopoulos, C., & Chaddad, F. (2004). Advances in cooperative theory since 1990: A review of agricultural economics literature. In G. W. J. Hendrikse (Eds.), Restructuring cooperatives. Rotterdam Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  3. Didier, V. B., Henninger, M. C., & El Akremi, A. (2012). The relationship between members’ trust and participation in the governance of cooperatives: The role of organisational commitment. IFAMR, 15(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  4. Eser, Z., & Peek, J. (2006). Reciprocity and network coordination: Evidence from Japanese Banks, Hi-Stat Discussion paper series; No. d05-157, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.Google Scholar
  5. Fowler, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2010). Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 5334–5338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gulati, R., & Singh, H. (1998). The architecture of cooperation: Managing coordination costs and appropriate concerns in strategic alliance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 781–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hart, O. D. & Moore, J. (1998). Cooperatives versus outside ownership. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  8. Iiro, J., Noreen, B., & Tuominen, H. (2012). Affective commitment in co-operative organizations: What make members want to stay? International Business Research, 5(10), 1–10. Available at
  9. Kahan, D. M. (2002). The logic of reciprocity: Trust, collective action and law, John M. Olin Center for Studies in Law, Economics and Public Policy. Working Papers. Paper 284
  10. Kalogeras, N., Baourakis, G., Zopounidis, C., & van Dijk, G. (2009a). Evaluating the financial performance of agri-food firms: A multicriteria decision-aid approach. Journal of Food Engineering, 70, 365–371.Google Scholar
  11. Kalogeras, N., Pennings, J. M. E., van der Lans, I. A., Garcia, P., & Dijk, V. (2009b). Understanding heterogeneous preferences of cooperative members. Agribusiness, 25(1), 90–111.Google Scholar
  12. Mauss, A. (1969). The gift (p. 70). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  13. Michael, P. E., & van Vugt, M. (2014). The evolution of leader-follower reciprocity: The theory of service-for-prestige. Hypothesis and Theory Article. Published on June 2014.
  14. Rilling, J. K., & Sanfey, A. G. (2011). The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 23–48. Scholar
  15. White, S., & Siu-Yun Lui, S. (2005). Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 913–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gert van Dijk
    • 1
  • Panagiota Sergaki
    • 2
  • George Baourakis
    • 3
  1. 1.TIAS School for Business and SocietyTilburg UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece
  3. 3.Department of Business Economics and ManagementMediterranean Agronomic Institute of ChaniaChaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations