Abstract
The general justification for the existence and use of European criminal law is the protection od human dignity. The ECHR regime imposes on the contractíng parties an obligation to use criminal law measures and to ensure effective procedural rights to tackle crime that infringes the principle of human dignity. EU criminal law is more utilitarian and consequentialist from its surfacing premise as its justification is to enhance the Member States’ ability to tackle cross-border crime effectively. Subsequently EU criminal law enhances the Member States’ sovereignty this way. Naturally, EU criminal law should not contradict the general framework of the ECHR regime since all of the EU Member States are parties to the ECHR as well. Even though the ECHR regime aims to effective realization of Convention rights by utlizing the dynamic interpretation of the Convention, the regime ultimately protect the deontological reasons for the very existence of the Convention. The EU criminal law also needs to follow the EU-level criminalization principles in order to be legitimate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer International Publishing Switzerland and G. Giappichelli Editore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kettunen, M. (2020). Conclusions: European Criminal Law—Justification and Restrictions. In: Legitimizing European Criminal Law. Comparative, European and International Criminal Justice, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16174-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16174-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-16173-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-16174-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)