Advertisement

A New Framework for Modelling Schedules in Complex and Uncertain NPD Projects

  • Ann LedwithEmail author
  • Evan Murphy
Chapter
Part of the Decision Engineering book series (DECENGIN)

Abstract

Producing reliable schedules for new product development (NPD) projects can be difficult. The uncertainty involved in NPD and the complex relationships between project tasks often leads to task repetition. This results in project schedules that are not linear and cannot be predicted using traditional methods. This case introduces a new modelling approach that aims to provide a more accurate and process specific representation of NPD project schedules. It was developed in a large multi-national component company and addresses the challenges they face producing accurate schedules for their NPD projects. The new approach uses a set of process specific variables rather than the subjective iteration probabilities used by earlier approaches. This results in more reliable project schedules accounting for specific project variations.

Keywords

Project management New product development Project scheduling Complex projects 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmadi A, Roemer TA, Wang RH (2001) Structuring product development processes. Eur J Oper Res 130(3):539–558MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Browning TR (2001) Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 48:292–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Browning TR, Eppinger SD (2002) Modelling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):428–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Browning TR, Deyst JJ, Eppinger SD, Whitney DE (2002) Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):443–458Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen C-H, Ling SF, Chen W (2003) Project scheduling for collaborative product development using DSM. Int J Project Manag 21:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho S-H, Eppinger SD (2005) A simulation based process model for managing complex design projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(3):316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper KG (1993) The rework cycle: benchmarks for the project manager. Project Manag J 24:17–22Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cooper KG (1993) The rework cycle: why projects are mismanaged. PM network magazine, Feb 1993, pp 5–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flanagan TL, Eckert CM, Keller R, Clarkson PJ (2005) Robust planning of design tasks using simulation. In: International conference on engineering design ICED 05, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ford D, Sterman JD (2003) Overcoming the 90% syndrome: iteration management in concurrent development projects. Concurr Eng Res Appl 11:177–186Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Griffin A (1993) Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. J Prod Innov manag 10(2):112–125Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hardie N (2001) The prediction and control of project duration: a recursive model. Int J Project Manag 19(7):401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herroelen W, Leus R (2005) Project scheduling under uncertainty: survey and research potentials. Eur J Oper Res 165(2):289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kawakita J (1967) Hassohou. Chuokoron-shinsya, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin J, Chai KH, Wong YS, Brombacher AC (2008) A dynamic model for managing overlapped iterative product development. Eur J Oper Res 185:378–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luh PB, Liu F, Moser B (1999) Scheduling of design projects with uncertain number of iterations. Eur J Oper Res 113(3):575–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maheswari JU, Varghese K (2005) A structured approach to form dependency structure matrix for construction projects. In: 22nd international symposium on automation and robotics in construction, 2005Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Repenning NP (2001) Understanding fire fighting in new product development. J Prod Innov Manag 18(5):285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1993) Characteristics and models of iteration in engineering design. M.I.T. Sloan School of management paperGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997) A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Manag Sci 43(8):1104–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steward DV (1981) The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 28:71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang J, Lin YI (2009) An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development. Comput Ind Eng 57(2):460–474MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Williams T (2003) The contribution of mathematical modelling to the practice of project management. IMA J Manag Math 14:3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yassine AA (2004) An introduction to modelling and analysing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method. Ital Manag Rev 9:71–88Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LimerickLimerickIreland

Personalised recommendations