Advertisement

How PLM Drives Innovation in the Curriculum and Pedagogy of Fashion Business Education: A Case Study of a UK Undergraduate Programme

  • Jo ConlonEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Decision Engineering book series (DECENGIN)

Abstract

PLM is increasingly understood as a strategic platform to facilitate business transformation through its dual role: firstly, driving operational excellence and then as a platform for innovation through providing an impetus for continuous engagement with emerging technologies. The three P’s of PLM: process, product data and people, remind us that if the transformational potential of PLM is to be achieved, there is a growing need for professionals with an understanding of PLM as the backbone of the future enterprise facilitating an open-ended view of product lifecycle management. The retail sector, previously a late adopter of PLM, is now undergoing a period of significant investment. In parallel, educators within the associated higher education sector are challenged with maintaining a forward-facing curriculum and providing new learning environments that engage students to suitably prepare them for future professional practice. The argument that is advanced in this case study is that PLM provides a contemporary framework and alternative approach for establishing a collaborative, forward-facing pedagogy for fashion business. Further, the insight and energy of students and graduates at the periphery of practice or their “peripheral wisdom” (Wenger in Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press, p. 216, [25]) has much to contribute to a sector in transition. This case-study reports on the first ever educational partnership to embed PLM in an undergraduate fashion programme in a UK University and seeks to encourage other educators to embrace PLM as a vehicle for educational change. This partnership was formed in 2014 with PTC for FlexPLM. The case study illustrates the initial implementation of product lifecycle management in conjunction with a shift from traditional lectures to collaborative learning practices to provide a powerful learning environment that equips future fashion professionals with a key differentiator that can drive the transformation of the industry.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the generosity of Mark Harrop, the WhichPLM team and the WhichPLM academy website.

References

  1. 1.
    Aspers P, Skov L (2006) Encounters in the global fashion business: afterword. Curr Sociol 54(5):802–813.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392106066817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bain M (2017) Gucci has a “shadow committee” of millennial advisors. Retrieved from https://qz.com/1111798/gucci-has-a-shadow-committee-of-millennial-advisors/
  3. 3.
    Christopher M, Lowson R, Peck H (2004) Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 32(8):367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark J (2015) Fashion merchandising: principles and practice. Palgrave, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Conlon J, Taylor A (2012) Innovating the collaborative future of global fashion business. In: Designs on E-Learning international conference—cloud and crowd: towards a collaborative future, 7th Sept 2012, University of the Arts, London http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/15462/
  6. 6.
    Crewe L (2013) When virtual and material worlds collide: democratic fashion in the digital age. Environ Plan A 45(4):760–780.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a4546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fine B, Fine BJ, Leopold E (1993) The world of consumption. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Han S, Tyler D, Apeagyei P (2015) Upcycling as a design strategy for product lifetime optimisation and societal changeGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jong JY (2017) The fashion switch: the new rules of the fashion business. Rethink Press, Great BritainGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karpova E, Jacobs B, Lee JY, Andrew A (2011) Preparing students for careers in the global apparel industry: experiential learning in a virtual multinational team-based collaborative project. Clothing Text Res J 29(4):298–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    LeHew ML, Meyer DJ (2005) Preparing global citizens for leadership in the textile and apparel industry. Clothing Text Res J 23(4):290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lundvall B (2016) The learning economy and the economics of hope. Anthem Press, London; New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McRobbie A (1998) British fashion design: rag trade or image industry?. Routledge, London.  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203168011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Muhammad AJ, Ha-Brookshire JE (2011) Exploring job responsibilities and requirements of US textile and apparel sourcing personnel. J Fashion Mark Manage Int J 15(1):41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    OC&C Strategy Consultants and Fashion Retail Academy (2016) Fast forwarding fashion: skills for the future https://www.fashionretailacademy.ac.uk/media/320353/26994_fast-forwarding-fashion_fra.pdf. Retrieved 26th Oct 2018
  16. 16.
    Orr S, Shreeve A (2018) Art and design pedagogy in higher education: knowledge, values and ambiguity in the creative curriculum. Taylor & Francis Group, London, New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pasricha A, Kadolph SJ (2009) Millennial generation and fashion education: a discussion on agents of change. Int J Fashion Des Technol Educ 2(2–3):119–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Radclyffe-Thomas N, Varley R, Roncha A (2018) Balancing the books: creating a model of responsible fashion business education. Art, Des Commun High Educ 17(1):89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Romeo LD, Lee YA (2013) Creative and technical design skills: are college apparel curriculums meeting industry needs? Int J Fashion Des, Technol Educ 6(3):132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stark J (2015) Product lifecycle management: volume 1: 21st century paradigm for product realisation. Springer International Publishing, London. ISBN 978-3-319-17439-6Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suleski J, Draper L (2014) PLM for apparel 2014: the next stage of alignment begins to take shape, apparelGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tovey MM (ed) (2015) Design pedagogy: developments in art and design education. Ashgate Publishing, LtdGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Walter L (2016) A strategic innovation and research agenda for the european textile and clothing industry, towards a 4th industrial revolution of textiles and clothing, textile european technology platform (ETP)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weetman C (2017) A circular economy handbook for business and supply chains: repair, remake, redesign, rethink. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    d’Avolio E, Bandinelli R, Rinaldi R (2015) Improving new product development in the fashion industry through product lifecycle management: a descriptive analysis. Int J Fashion Des Technol Educ 8(2):108–121.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2015.1005697CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Art, Design and ArchitectureUniversity of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations