Advertisement

Where on Earth Are the Best-50 Time Servers?

  • Yi CaoEmail author
  • Darryl Veitch
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11419)

Abstract

We present a list of the Best-50 public IPv4 time servers by mining a high-resolution dataset of Stratum-1 servers for Availability, Stratum Constancy, Leap Performance, and Clock Error, broken down by continent. We find that a server with ideal leap performance, high availability, and low stratum variation is often clock error-free, but this is no guarantee. We discuss the relevance and lifetime of our findings, the scalability of our approach, and implications for load balancing and server ranking.

Keywords

Leap second NTP Stratum-1 server Network measurement LI bits UTC Load balancing Clock synchronization 

Notes

Acknowledgment

Partially supported by Australian Research Council’s Discovery Projects funding scheme #DP170100451.

References

  1. 1.
    Archipelago monitor locations. http://www.caida.org/projects/ark/locations/
  2. 2.
    Bajpai, V., Schönwälder, J.: A survey on internet performance measurement platforms and related standardization efforts. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 17(3), 1313–1341 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brittain, S., Böhning, D.: Estimators in capture-recapture studies with two sources. AStA Adv. Stat. Anal. 93(1), 23–47 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cao, Y., Veitch, D.: TimeServer Dataset 2016–2017. https://data.research.uts.edu.au/public/DVTSD/. Per-server results also available
  5. 5.
    Cao, Y., Veitch, D.: Network timing, weathering the 2016 leap second. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2018, Honolulu, USA, 15–19 April 2018Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guyton, J.D., Schwartz, M.F.: Experiences with a Survey Tool for Discovering Network Time Protocol Servers (1994). Accessed 31 July 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hong, C.-Y., Lin, C.-C., Caesar, M.: Clockscalpel: understanding root causes of internet clock synchronization inaccuracy. In: Spring, N., Riley, G.F. (eds.) PAM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6579, pp. 204–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19260-9_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malone, D.: The leap second behaviour of NTP servers. In: Proceedings of the Traffic Monitoring and Analysis workshop, 7–8 April 2016. IFIP Digital Library (2016). http://tma.ifip.org/2016/#program
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Murta, C., Torres, P., Mohapatra, P.: Characterizing quality of time and topology in a time synchronization network. In: Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM 2006, pp. 1–5 (2006). IEEE, November 2006Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ntp.org. NTP Pool Project (2018). Accessed 2 May 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    pool.ntp.org. How do I use pool.net.org? http://www.pool.ntp.org/en/use.html
  13. 13.
    pool.ntp.org. NTP Pool server selection. http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Servers/NTPPoolServers
  14. 14.
    Staff, R.N.: Ripe atlas: a global internet measurement network. Internet Protoc. J. 18(3) (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sutherland, W.J.: Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Veitch, D., Ridoux, J., Korada, S.B.: Robust synchronization of absolute and difference clocks over networks. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 17(2), 417–430 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Veitch, D., Vijayalayan, K.: Network timing and the 2015 leap second. In: Proceedings of PAM 2016, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 31 March - 1 April 2016Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vijayalayan, K., Veitch, D.: Rot at the roots? Examining public timing infrastructure. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2016, San Francisco, CA, USA, 10–15 April 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical and Data EngineeringUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations