Abstract
Fixed dental prostheses are a common and predictable option for the replacement of missing teeth. These restorations require the preparation of the abutment teeth in order to allow adequate space for the materials used to fabricate the prosthesis. Once the preparation is completed, the three-dimensional information relative to the oral hard and soft tissues is captured through a digital or an analog impression to allow the design and fabrication of the prosthesis using CAD-CAM technology. Clinical evidence has shown the predictable long-term survival of fixed dental prostheses, which varies depending on the length of the edentulous span, the abutment status, and prosthetic materials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):624–39.
Pol CWP, Raghoebar GM, Kerdijk W, Boven GC, Cune MS, Meijer HJA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth? J Oral Rehabil. 2017;45(2):147–60.
Rosenstiel SF. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016.
Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(4):363–76.
Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations—a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):959–68.
The glossary of prosthodontics terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10–92.
Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124.
Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):184–190.e12.
Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):356–63.
Mandikos MN. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:428–34.
Shillingburg HT. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1997.
Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):178–92.
Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44–56.
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505–11.
Brochu M. Focalisation sur les scanneurs dentaires numériques: la science a l'appui. Can J Restor Dent Prosthodont. 2009:45–8.
Papaspyridakos P, Kang K, DeFuria C, Amin S, Kudara Y, Weber HP. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(1):5–13.
Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):43–8.
Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):252–7.
De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L. Long-term results of short-span versus long-span fixed dental prostheses: an up to 20-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(1):75–85.
Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(6):493–502.
Sailer I, Balmer M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Känel S, Thoma DS. 10-Year randomized trial (RCT) of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2018;76:32–9.
Makarouna M, Ullmann K, Lazarek K, Boening KW. Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(3):204–6.
Teichmann M, Göckler F, Weber V, Yildirim M, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017;56:65–77.
Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(1):22–30.
Yang Y, Yu J, Gao J, Guo J, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang S. Clinical outcomes of different types of tooth-supported bilayer lithium disilicate all-ceramic restorations after functioning up to 5 years: a retrospective study. J Dent. 2016;51:56–61.
Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):e63–71.
Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):552–7.
Nicolaisen MH, Bahrami G, Schropp L, Isidor F. Comparison of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic three unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(3):259–64.
Sailer I, Gottnerb J, Kanelb S, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(6):553–60.
Naenni N, Bindl A, Sax C, Hämmerle C, Sailer I. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results. J Dent. 2015;43(11):1365–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wazirian, B., Chochlidakis, K., Papaspyridakos, P., Ercoli, C. (2019). CAD-CAM Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs). In: Tamimi, F., Hirayama, H. (eds) Digital Restorative Dentistry . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15974-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15974-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15973-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15974-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)