Skip to main content

CAD-CAM Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Restorative Dentistry

Abstract

Fixed dental prostheses are a common and predictable option for the replacement of missing teeth. These restorations require the preparation of the abutment teeth in order to allow adequate space for the materials used to fabricate the prosthesis. Once the preparation is completed, the three-dimensional information relative to the oral hard and soft tissues is captured through a digital or an analog impression to allow the design and fabrication of the prosthesis using CAD-CAM technology. Clinical evidence has shown the predictable long-term survival of fixed dental prostheses, which varies depending on the length of the edentulous span, the abutment status, and prosthetic materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater. 2015;31(6):624–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pol CWP, Raghoebar GM, Kerdijk W, Boven GC, Cune MS, Meijer HJA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses: are the results of 2 abutment implants comparable to the results of 2 abutment teeth? J Oral Rehabil. 2017;45(2):147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenstiel SF. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent. 2001;85(4):363–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wöstmann B. Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations—a literature review. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(5):959–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. The glossary of prosthodontics terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:10–92.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Joda T, Zarone F, Ferrari M. The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(2):184–190.e12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Örtorp A, Jönsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):356–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandikos MN. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: an update on clinical use. Aust Dent J. 1998;43:428–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shillingburg HT. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Joda T, Ferrari M, Gallucci GO, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital technology in fixed implant prosthodontics. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):178–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J. 2008;204(9):505–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brochu M. Focalisation sur les scanneurs dentaires numériques: la science a l'appui. Can J Restor Dent Prosthodont. 2009:45–8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Papaspyridakos P, Kang K, DeFuria C, Amin S, Kudara Y, Weber HP. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(1):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;118(1):43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: Time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):252–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. De Backer H, Van Maele G, De Moor N, Van den Berghe L. Long-term results of short-span versus long-span fixed dental prostheses: an up to 20-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21(1):75–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23(6):493–502.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sailer I, Balmer M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CHF, Känel S, Thoma DS. 10-Year randomized trial (RCT) of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2018;76:32–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Makarouna M, Ullmann K, Lazarek K, Boening KW. Six-year clinical performance of lithium disilicate fixed partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(3):204–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teichmann M, Göckler F, Weber V, Yildirim M, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and complication rates of lithium-disilicate (Empress 2) tooth-supported crowns, implant-supported crowns, and fixed dental prostheses. J Dent. 2017;56:65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pieger S, Salman A, Bidra AS. Clinical outcomes of lithium disilicate single crowns and partial fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(1):22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y, Yu J, Gao J, Guo J, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang S. Clinical outcomes of different types of tooth-supported bilayer lithium disilicate all-ceramic restorations after functioning up to 5 years: a retrospective study. J Dent. 2016;51:56–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wolfart S, Eschbach S, Scherrer S, Kern M. Clinical outcome of three-unit lithium-disilicate glass–ceramic fixed dental prostheses: up to 8 years results. Dent Mater. 2009;25(9):e63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmitter M, Mussotter K, Rammelsberg P, Gabbert O, Ohlmann B. Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39(7):552–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nicolaisen MH, Bahrami G, Schropp L, Isidor F. Comparison of metal-ceramic and all-ceramic three unit posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2016;29(3):259–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sailer I, Gottnerb J, Kanelb S, Hammerle CH. Randomized controlled clinical trial of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses: a 3-year follow-up. Int J Prosthodont. 2009;22(6):553–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Naenni N, Bindl A, Sax C, Hämmerle C, Sailer I. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results. J Dent. 2015;43(11):1365–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wazirian, B., Chochlidakis, K., Papaspyridakos, P., Ercoli, C. (2019). CAD-CAM Fixed Dental Prostheses (FDPs). In: Tamimi, F., Hirayama, H. (eds) Digital Restorative Dentistry . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15974-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15974-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15973-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15974-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics