Advertisement

What Do Prospective Students Want? An Observational Study of Preferences About Subject of Study in Higher Education

  • Alessandro VinciarelliEmail author
  • Walter Riviera
  • Francesca Dalmasso
  • Stefan Raue
  • Chamila Abeyratna
Chapter
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 159)

Abstract

This article presents an observational study about the choice of Higher Education of 4,885 prospective students attending an Open Day organised by the University of Glasgow. In particular, this work analyses the distribution of the preferences across the 109 subjects (e.g., Mechanical Engineering, English Literature, etc.) that have been presented during the Open Day. The results suggest that factors like the graduate prospects (percentage of students that have a job or continue education within one year after graduation in a given area) or the first expected salary do not play a major role in the distribution of the preferences. When it comes to the difference between female and male prospective students, the results show that the science-humanities divide is less significant than the care-technical one. Finally, the data shows that the level of education in the environment where someone lives is the dimension along which the prospective students are most unequal.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by The Data Lab (www.thedatalab.com) through the project “Knowledge Extraction for Business Opportunities” (agreement 70539). Two of the authors (Stefan Raue and Chamila Abeyratna) work for Bizvento (www.bizvento.com), the company that has developed the mobile application used to collect the data.

References

  1. 1.
    Ayalon, H.: Women and men go to university: mathematical background and gender differences in choice of field in higher education. Sex Roles 48(5–6), 277–290 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ayalon, H., Yogev, A.: Field of study and students’ stratification in an expanded system of higher education: the case of Israel. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 21(3), 227–241 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ball, S., Davies, J., David, M., Reay, D.: “Classification” and “judgement” : social class and the “cognitive structures” of choice of higher education. Br. J. Sociol. Educ. 23(1), 51–72 (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baron-Cohen, S.: The Essential Difference. Penguin (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., Wheelwright, S.: The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 358(1430), 361–374 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S.: The Empathy Quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 34(2), 163–175 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barone, C.: Some things never change: gender segregation in higher education across eight nations and three decades. Sociol. Educ. 84(2), 157–176 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baum, S., Ma, J., Payea, K.: Education pays, 2010: the benefits of higher education for individuals and society. Tech. rep., College Board Advocacy & Policy Center (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boliver, V.: Expansion, differentiation, and the persistence of social class inequalities in British higher education. High. Educ. 61, 229–242 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Briggs, S.: An exploratory study of the factors influencing undergraduate student choice: the case of higher education in Scotland. Stud. High. Educ. 31(6), 705–722 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Briggs, S., Wilson, A.: Which university? A study of the influence of cost and information factors on Scottish undergraduate choice. J. High. Educ. Policy Manage. 29(1), 57–72 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Choi, B., Pak, A.: A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2(1), A13 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Correll, S.: Gender and the career choice process: the role of biased self-assessments 1. Am. J. Sociol. 106(6), 1691–1730 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durndell, A., Siann, G., Glissov, P.: Gender differences and computing in course choice at entry into higher education. Br. Educ. Res. J. 16(2), 149–162 (1990)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Egerton, M., Halsey, A.: Trends by social class and gender in access to higher education in Britain. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 19(2), 183–196 (1993)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lörz, M., Schindler, S., Walter, J.: Gender inequalities in higher education: extent, development and mechanisms of gender differences in enrolment and field of study choice. Ir. Educ. Stud. 30(2), 179–198 (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manson, C., Winterbottom, M.: Examining the association between empathising, systemising, degree subject and gender. Educ. Stud. 38(1), 73–88 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maple, S., Stage, F.: Influences on the choice of math/science major by gender and ethnicity. Am. Educ. Res. J. 28(1), 37–60 (1991)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marginson, S.: The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. High. Educ. 72(4), 413–434 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nguyen, H.H., Ryan, A.: Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. J. Appl. Psychol. 93(6), 1314–1334 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J.Y., Podsakoff, N.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Poock, M., Love, P.: Factors influencing the program choice of doctoral students in higher education administration. J. Student Aff. Res. Pract. 38(2), 203–223 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reay, D.: “Always knowing” and “never being sure”: familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. J. Educ. Policy 13(4), 519–529 (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reay, D., Davies, J., David, M., Ball, S.: Choices of degree or degrees of choice? class, ‘race’ and the higher education choice process. Sociology 35(4), 855–874 (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scottish government equality outcomes: gender evidence review. Social research series, The Scottish Government (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Secondary analysis of the gender pay gap. Tech. rep., UK Government, Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siann, G., Callaghan, M.: Choices and barriers: factors influencing women’s choice of higher education in science, engineering and technology. J. Furth. High. Educ. 25(1), 85–95 (2001)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Simões, C., Soares, A.: Applying to higher education: information sources and choice factors. Stud. High. Educ. 35(4), 371–389 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spencer, S., Steele, C., Quinn, D.: Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35(1), 4–28 (1999)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Steele, J., Ambady, N.: “Math is hard!” The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 42(4), 428–436 (2006)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    The communications market report. Tech. rep., Ofcom (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Triventi, M.: The role of higher education stratification in the reproduction of social inequality in the labor market. Res. Soc. Stratif. Mobil. 32, 45–63 (2013)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Triventi, M.: Stratification in higher education and its relationship with social inequality: a comparative study of 11 European countries. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 29(3), 489–502 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Van de Werfhorst, H., Kraaykamp, G.: Four field-related educational resources and their impact on labor, consumption, and sociopolitical orientation. Sociol. Educ. 74(4), 296–317 (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Melanthiou, Y.: A contemporary higher education student-choice model for developed countries. J. Bus. Res. 60(9), 979–989 (2007)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Webbink, D., Hartog, J.: Can students predict starting salaries? Yes!. Econ. Educ. Rev. 23(2), 103–113 (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wilkins, S., Shams, F., Huisman, J.: The decision-making and changing behavioural dynamics of potential higher education students: the impacts of increasing tuition fees in England. Educ. Stud. 39(2), 125–141 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Vinciarelli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Walter Riviera
    • 1
  • Francesca Dalmasso
    • 1
  • Stefan Raue
    • 2
  • Chamila Abeyratna
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  2. 2.BizventoGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations