Aca-Fans on Tracing Bowie Stardom for Being and Becoming

  • Toija CinqueEmail author
  • Sean Redmond


This chapter applies notions of aca-fandom built in and around star and celebrity figures (Hills in Fan Cultures. Routledge, London, 2002; Fan Culture: Theory/Practice. Newcastle upon Tyne, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012; Jenkins 2012) to draw on the stories of participants attending and presenting at academic conferences focused on David Bowie. We search here for how Bowie’s work has been interacted with, shared, translated and interpreted particularly by aca-fans. The use of auto-ethnographic methods to allow our fellow aca-fans to ‘story’ their own reactions to David Bowie enables us to delve into the types of emotional responses or tendencies to respond that are stirred by Bowie fandom in/for a professional life. Here we perpend the ways aca-fans’ interlinked feelings and memories are traced back and forward, emotionally entwined in remembrances of Bowie and intimately shared for what their fandom might have contributed to their professional practice via being and becoming.


David Bowie Aca-fandom Stardom Celebrity Becoming Fandom 


  1. Brooker, W. The Best Batman Story: The Dark Knight Returns. In Beautiful Things in Popular Culture, ed. Alan McKee, 33–48. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Brooker, W. Forever Stardust: David Bowie Across the Universe. London: I.B. Tauris, 2017.Google Scholar
  3. Cinque, T. “Celebrity Conferences as Confessional Spaces: The Aca-Fan Memory Traces of David Bowie’s Stardom.” Celebrity Studies 10 (1) (2019): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clandinin, J. D., and M. F. Connely. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Cochran, T. R. “Toward a Rhetoric of Scholar-Fandom.” Dissertation, Georgia State University, 2009. Accessed 5 June 2017.
  6. Dwyer, S. C., and J. L. Buckle. “The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8 (1) (2009): 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Furness, Z. M, ed. Punkademics: The Basement Show in the Ivory Tower, 5–24. Brooklyn, NY: Minor Compositions, 2012.Google Scholar
  8. Gramsci, A. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. Hills, M. Fan Cultures. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
  10. Hills, M. “‘Proper Distance’ in the Ethical Positioning of Scholar-Fandoms: Between Academics’ and Fans’ Moral Economies?” In Fan Culture: Theory/Practice, ed. K. Larson and L. Zubernis, 14–37. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
  11. Hills, M. “Implicit Fandom in the Fields of Theatre, Art, and Literature: Studying ‘Fans’ Beyond Fan Discourse.” In A Companion to Media Fandom and Fan Studies, ed. P. Booth, 477–494. Boston: Wiley, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins, H. “‘When Fandom Goes Mainstream …’.” Confessions of an Aca-Fan [online], n.p., 2006. Accessed 21 April 2015.
  13. Jenkins, H. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. London: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Marshall, P. D. “Productive Consumption: Agency, Appropriation and Value in the Creative Consuming of David Bowie.” In Toija Cinque and Sean Redmond Special guest-edited edition, “Intersecting David Bowie.” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 31 (4) (2017): 564–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Phillips, T. “Embracing the ‘Overly Confessional’: Scholar-Fandom and Approaches to Personal Research.” Flow 13 (5) (2010): 1–15.Google Scholar
  16. Platt, V., and M. Squire, eds. The Frame in Classical Art: A Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  17. Schopenhauer, A. The Essential Schopenhauer. First published in Parerga and Paralipomena, 1851. London: Unwin Books, 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Winnicott, D. W. Playing and Reality. London: Penguin, 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Woodward, K. Psychosocial Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts and EducationDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations