Abstract
One important goal in sustainability is making technologies available to the maximum possible number of individuals, and especially to those living in less developed areas (Goal 9 of SDG). However, the diffusion of technical knowledge is hindered by a number of factors, among which the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) system plays a primary role. While opinions about the real effect of IPRs in stimulating and disseminating innovation differ, there is a growing number of authors arguing that a different approach may be more effective in promoting global development. The success of the Open Source (OS) model in the field of software has led analysts to speculate whether this paradigm can be extended to other fields. Key to this model are both free access to knowledge and the right to use other people’s results. After reviewing the main features of the OS model, we explore different areas where it can be profitably applied, such as hardware design and production; we then discuss how academical institutions can (and should) help diffusing the OS philosophy and practice. Widespread use of OS software, fostering of research projects aimed to use and develop OS software and hardware, the use of open education tools, and a strong commitment to open access publishing are some of the discussed examples.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aksulu A, Wade M (2010) A comprehensive review and synthesis of open source research. J Assoc Inform Syst 11(11):576
Appropedia (2018) W3Techs—extensive and reliable web technology surveys. http://www.appropedia.org. Accessed 17 July 2018
Aragona F (2005) Open sourcing appropriate technology Part I. https://agroinnovations.com/blog/2005/11/17/open-sourcing-appropriate-technology-part-i/. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
Arduino (2018). https://www.arduino.cc. Accessed 16 July 2018
ARL (2018) Association of research libraries statistics. http://www.arlstatistics.org. Accessed 24 July 2018
Axelerant (2018) Open source in higher education: top 10 universities. https://www.axelerant.com/resources/articles/open-source-in-higher-education. Accessed 30 July 2018
Bacon S, Dillon T (2006) The potential of open source approaches for education. Futurelab Open Education Reports. https://www.nfer.ac.uk/media/1821/futl58.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2018
Badamasi YA (2014) The working principle of an Arduino. In: 2014 11th international conference on electronics, computer and computation (ICECCO). IEEE, pp 1–4
Benkler Y (2002) Coase’s Penguin, or, Linux and “The Nature of the Firm”. Yale Law J 369–446
Benkler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press
Björk B-C, Solomon D (2014) Developing an effective market for open access article processing charges. Abgerufen Am 22(2):2015
Black Duck (2016) The tenth annual future of open source survey. Black Duck Software
Blind K (2012) The influence of regulations on innovation: a quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Res Policy 41(2):391–400
BOAI (2002) Read the budapest open access initiative. http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Accessed 27 July 2018
Bohannon J (2016) Who’s downloading pirated papers? Everyone
Boldrin M, Levine DK (2013) The case against patents. J Econ Perspect 27(1):3–22
Boldrin M, Levine DK et al (2008) Against intellectual monopoly, vol 78. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bonaccorsi A, Rossi C (2003) Why open source software can succeed. Res Policy 32(7):1243–1258
Boulanger A (2005) Open-source versus proprietary software: is one more reliable and secure than the other? IBM Syst J 44(2):239–248
Brandt W (1980) North–South: a program for survival. Bandt Report. MIT Press
Brandt W (1983) Common crisis North–South: cooperation for world recovery. Pan World Affairs, Pan
Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the World Commission on environment and development: “Our Common Future”. United Nations. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018
Buranyi S (2017) Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science? The Guardian. 27 July 2017
Butcher N (2015) A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning (COL)
Carmichael P, Honour L (2002) Open source as appropriate technology for global education. Int J Edu Dev 22(1):47–53
Casson T, Ryan PS (2006) Open standards, open source adoption in the public sector, and their relationship to Microsoft’s market dominance. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1656616. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
Coppola C, Neelley E (2004) Open source-opens learning: why open source makes sense for education. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/106028. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
Daley W (2014) In search of optimality: innovation, economic development, and intellectual property rights. In: Global sustainable development report prototype, briefs, 2014. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5580Innovation,%20Economic%20Development%20and%20Intellectual%20Property%20Rights.pdf. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
edX (2018) About us. https://www.edx.org/about-us. Accessed 16 July 2018
FSF (2017) Free software foundation: the free software definition. http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html. Accessed 18 Sept 2018
Ghosh RA, Glott R, Krieger B, Robles G (2002) Free/Libre and open source software: survey and study—Part 4: survey of developers. http://flossproject.merit.unu.edu/report/FLOSS_Final4.pdf. Accessed 7 March 2019
Gloor PA (2006) Swarm creativity: competitive advantage through collaborative innovation networks. Oxford University Press
Google (2016) Google summer of code. https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com. Accessed 16 July 2018
Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Morris RA, Agosti D, Penev L, Berendsohn WG, Hobern D (2011) Creative commons licenses and the non-commercial condition: Implications for the re-use of biodiversity information. ZooKeys 150:127
Henry C, Stiglitz JE (2010) Intellectual property, dissemination of innovation and sustainable development. Glob Policy 1(3):237–251
Hess C, Ostrom E (eds) (2007) Understanding knowledge as a commons. MIT Press
Jones R, Haufe P, Sells E, Iravani P, Olliver V, Palmer C, Bowyer A (2011) Reprap-the replicating rapid prototyper. Robotica 29(1):177–191
Kohn A (1987) Studies find reward often no motivator. Boston Globe 19:52–59
Kohn A (1992) No contest: the case against competition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Kop R, Hill A (2008) Connectivism: learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn 9(3)
Krishnamurthy S (2005) An analysis of open source business models. In: Feller J, Brian Fitzgerald SH, Lakhani K (eds) Making sense of the bazaar: perspectives on open source and free software. MIT Press
Lakhan SE, Jhunjhunwala K (2008) Open source software in education. Educ Quart 31(2):32
Li Z, Seering W, Ramos JD, Wallace D (2017) Why open source? Exploring the motivations of using an open model for hardware development. In: Proceedings of the ASME
Long PD (2002) Opencourseware: simple idea, profound implications. Syllabus 15(6):12
Marsan J, Paré G, Beaudry A (2012) Adoption of open source software in organizations: a socio-cognitive perspective. J Strateg Inform Syst 21(4):257–273
Miller BP, Koski D, Lee CP, Maganty V, Murthy R, Natarajan A, Steidl J (1995) Fuzz revisited: a re-examination of the reliability of unix utilities and services. Technical report
Möller E (2007) Anonymous co-authors (2007ff) The case for free use: reasons not to use a Creative-Commons-NC-License. http://freedomdefined.org/Licenses/NC. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
Möller E (2008) Definition of free cultural works version 1.1. http://freedomdefined.org/Definition. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
Mushtaq U, Pearce JM (2011) Open source appropriate nanotechnology. In: Nanotechnology and global sustainability. CRC Press, pp 220–245
Odlyzko A (1997) The economics of electronic journals. First Monday 2(8). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/542. Accessed 27 July 2018
OEC (2018) Open Education Consortium. http://www.oeconsortium.org. Accessed 16 July 2018
OEE (2018) Open Education Europa. http://www.openeducationeuropa.eu. Accessed 16 July 2018
OER Commons (2018) The OER Commons. http://www.oercommons.org. Accessed 16 July 2018
O’Hara KJ, Kay JS (2003) Open source software and computer science education. J Comput Sci Coll 18(3):1–7
Open Design Foundation (2000) Open design definition, v. 0.2. http://www.opendesign.org/odd.html. Accessed 5 April 2016
OpenHub (2018) https://www.openhub.net/. Accessed 23 July 2018
Opensource.com (2018) Education. https://opensource.com/education. Accessed 16 July 2018
OSE (2018) Global village construction set—open source ecology. https://wiki.opensourceecology.org/wiki/Global_Village_Construction_Set. Accessed 16 July 2018
OSHWA (2012) Open Source Hardware Association: OSH Definition. http://www.oshwa.org/definition/. Accessed 7 July 2018
OSI (2007) Open source initiative: the open source definition. https://opensource.org/osd. Accessed 22 April 2018
OSI (2018) Open source initiative: frequently asked questions: what is open source software? https://opensource.org/faq#osd. Accessed 22 April 2018
OSUA (2018) Open Source University Alliance. https://open-source-alliance.erasmuswithoutpaper.eu/. Accessed 5 March 2019
Pankaja N, Mukund Raj P (2013) Proprietary software versus open source software for education. Am J Eng Res 2(7):124–130
Pearce JM (2007) Teaching physics using appropriate technology projects. Phys Teach 45(3):164–167
Pearce JM (2012) The case for open source appropriate technology. Environ Dev Sustain 14(3):425–431
Perens B et al (1999) The open source definition. In: Open sources: voices from the open source revolution, vol 1, pp 171–188
Picerni A, De Rossi A (2009) L’offerta open source in italia: analisi di un settore in evoluzione
Pisanski K, Sorokowski P, Kulczycki E et al (2017) Predatory journals recruit fake editor. Nature 543:481–3
Pomerantz J, Peek R (2016) Fifty shades of open. First Monday 21(5). http://www.ojphi.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/6360/5460. Accessed 7 July 2018
Quilligan J (2002) The Brandt Equation: 21st century blueprint for the new global economy. Brandt 21 Forum
Raymond E (1999) The cathedral and the bazaar. Knowl Technol Policy 12(3):23–49
Roumani Y, Nwankpa J, Roumani YF (2017) Adopters’ trust in enterprise open source vendors: an empirical examination. J Syst Softw 125:256–270
Sample I (2012) Harvard university says it can’t afford journal publishers’ prices. The Guardian 24:2012
Scardamalia M, Bereiter C (1991) Higher levels of agency for children in knowledge building: a challenge for the design of new knowledge media. J Learn Sci 1(1):37–68
Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. Vintage
Shieber SM (2009) Equity for open-access journal publishing. PLoS Biol 7(8):e1000165
Stiglitz JE, Greenwald BC (2015) Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. Columbia University Press
Stokstad E (2011) network science: open-source ecology takes root across the world. Science 334(6054):308–309
Thompson C (2008) Build it. Share it. Profit. Can open source hardware work? Work, 10(08). https://www.wired.com/2008/10/ff-openmanufacturing/. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
United Nations (2015) Sustainable development goals, 17 goals to transform our world. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed 4 March 2018
Vallance R, Kiani S, Nayfeh S (2001) Open design of manufacturing equipment. In: CIRP 1st international conference on agile, reconfigurable manufacturing. Ann Arbor
Vogel G, Kupferschmidt K (2017) A bold open-access push in Germany could change the future of academic publishing. Science 23
Weber S et al (2000) The political economy of open source software. Technical report, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley
Wheeler DA (2015) Why open source software. http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
Zlotnick F (2017) Github open source survey 2017. http://opensourcesurvey.org/2017/. Accessed 4 Oct 2018
Acknowledgements
I am very grateful to Sandra Ristori and Ugo Bardi for reading the manuscript and giving valuable advice.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Signorini, G.F. (2019). Open Source and Sustainability: The Role of University. In: Leal Filho, W., Bardi, U. (eds) Sustainability on University Campuses: Learning, Skills Building and Best Practices. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15864-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15863-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15864-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)