Higher Education and Female Labor Market Outcomes in Six Muslim Countries

  • Ayça Akarçay
Part of the Intercultural Studies in Education book series (ISE)


The recent expansion in tertiary education has not been even across countries and gender, nor has its impact on the composition of the labor force and on labor force participation rates been uniform. In this chapter we compare six predominantly Muslim-populated economies from different regions and historical backgrounds (Egypt, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Pakistan, Tunisia, and Turkey) with other non-Muslim countries (Poland, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam). With similar levels of development and public expenditure in tertiary education, an increased population with higher education does not seem to have a substantially different impact on the distribution of the female labor force or unemployment and employment, except in Pakistan. However, concerning the highly educated female population, in terms of labor force participation and unemployment and employment rates, comparisons suggest significant discrepancies across countries.


Tertiary education Female labor force participation Muslim countries 


  1. Assaad, R. (2014). Making Sense of Arab Labor Markets: The Enduring Legacy of Dualism. IZA Journal of Labor & Development, 3(1), 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besamusca, J., Tijdens, K., Keune, M., & Steinmetz, S. (2015). Working women worldwide. Age effects in female labor force participation in 117 countries. World Development, 74, 123–141.Google Scholar
  3. Boserup, E. (1970). Woman’s Role in Economic Development. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bussemakers, C., van Oosterhout, K., Kraaykamp, G., & Spierings, N. (2017). Women’s Worldwide Education–Employment Connection: A Multilevel Analysis of the Moderating Impact of Economic, Political, and Cultural Contexts. World Development, 99, 28–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fernández, R. (2013). Cultural Change as Learning: The Evolution of Female Labor Force Participation Over a Century. American Economic Review, 103(1), 472–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaddis, I., & Klasen, S. (2014). Economic Development, Structural Change, and Women’s Labor Force Participation. Journal of Population Economics, 27(3), 639–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldin, C. (1995). The U-Shaped Female Labor Force Function in Economic Development and Economic History. In C. Goldin & T. P. Schultz (Eds.), Investment in Women’s Human Capital and Economic Development: Investment in Women’s Human Capital (pp. 61–90). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. ILO Database of Labour Statistics (ILOSTAT). Geneva: ILO. Google Scholar
  9. Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., et al. (Eds.). (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six—Country-Pooled Datafile Version. Madrid: JD Systems Institute.
  10. Kucera, D., & Tejani, S. (2014). Feminization, Defeminization, and Structural Change in Manufacturing. World Development, 64, 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Olivetti, C. (2014). The Female Labor Force and Long-Run Development: The American Experience in Comparative Perspective. In M. J. Bailey, M. Guldi, B. J. Hershbein, L. P. Boustan, C. Frydman, & R. A. Margo (Eds.), Human Capital in History: The American Record (pp. 161–204). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. PROPHE (The Program for Research on Private Higher Education).
  13. UNESCO. (2018). The Global Education Monitoring Report 2017/18: Accountability in Education. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  14. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  15. United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. (2012). The Religion-State Relationship and the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief: A Comparative Textual Analysis of the Constitutions of Majority Muslim Countries and Other OIC Members (Special Report).
  16. World Bank. (2017). Higher Education for Development: An Evaluation of the World Bank Group’s Support. An Independent Evaluation. Washington, DC: Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank Group.Google Scholar
  17. World Development Indicators (WDI). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayça Akarçay
    • 1
  1. 1.Economics Department and GIAMGalatasaray UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations