Experimental Study on Consistency of Different PEMS Devices

  • Wang ChangyuanEmail author
  • Gao Dongzhi
  • Yu Quanshun
  • Guo Yong
  • Xu Junhui
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 929)


The experimental object is a heavy duty vehicle fueled with diesel. The PEMS test was carried out in the environmental room with the chassis dynamometer to study the consistency of different PEMS equipment. The four kinds of PEMS equipment were used to detect the same vehicle. The environmental room can simulate the conditions at an altitude of 2400 m, 2000 m, temperature −7 °C and the normal temperature and pressure conditions. The test used the 1800 s world transient vehicle cycle (C-WTVC) and measure 4 cycles continuously. The test results are compared and analyzed with the results of HORIBA-CVS at the same conditions. Finally, the consistency of CO2, CO, NOx, PN via different PEMS were studied under different environment conditions. This study has guiding significance for the application of PEMS equipment in emission testing of China’s sixth stage.


PEMS Emission test Consistency Comparison test 



This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0208002).


  1. 1.
    Li Z, Hu J, Bao X et al (2009) Gaseous pollutant emission of China 3 heavy-duty diesel vehicles under real-road diving conditions. Res Environ Sci 22(12):1389–1394Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mark AD, James WB, Alex C et a1 SemtechD: the chassis roll evaluation of a commercial portable emission measurement system (PEMS). SAE Paper 2005-01-0673Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li M, Liu F, Chen Y et al (2006) Emission and fuel consumption performance evaluation of hybrid buses based on PEMS. J Jiangsu Univ 27(1):27–30Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cocker DR, Shan SD, Johnson K et al (2014) Development and application of a mobile laboratory for measuring emissions from diesel engines. 1. Regulated gaseous emissions. Environ Sci Technol 38(7):2182–2189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Satoshi S, Shinya S, Hosoya M (2013) Improvement of low-temperature performance of the NOx reduction efficiency on the urea-SCR catalysts. Sae World CongressGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang Z, Qian C, Zheng Y et al (2017) Experimental study on sensitivity of exhaust air pollutant temperature of heavy duty diesel vehicle based on PEMS. Autom Technol 2:171–175Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen C, Jing Q, Wang H et al (2005) Study on actual emission characteristics and influencing factors of heavy-duty motor vehicles. Acta Sci Circum 25(7):870–878Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jing Q, Chen C, Pan H et al (2006) Preliminary analysis of on-road emission characteristics of diesel buses. Acta Scientiac Cirsumstantiae 26(9):1400–1405Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cheng H, Chen C, Jing Q et al (2007) Onboard emissions from heavy-duty diesel vehicle and its relationship with driving behavior. Acta Sci Circum 27(2):177–184Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang Y, Ji W, Yin H et al (2014) Influencing factors of pollutant emission factor measurement for heavy diesel vehicles. Environ Sci Res 27(3):232–238Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wang Changyuan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gao Dongzhi
    • 1
  • Yu Quanshun
    • 1
  • Guo Yong
    • 1
  • Xu Junhui
    • 1
  1. 1.China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co., Ltd.TianjinChina

Personalised recommendations