Skip to main content

From Philosophy of Emotion to Epistemology: Some Questions About the Epistemic Relevance of Emotions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Value of Emotions for Knowledge

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss the relevance that emotions can play in our epistemic life considering the state of the art of the philosophical debate on emotions. The strategy is the one of focusing on the three main models on emotions as evaluative judgements, bodily feelings, and perceptions, following the fil rouge of emotion intentionality for rising questions about their epistemic functions. From this examination, a major challenge to mainstream epistemology arises, the one that asks to provide prominence to the epistemic agent and to her affects. This chapter discusses these implications, also providing an overview of the many alternatives available nowadays in epistemology, arguing for an open, comprehensive, and interdisciplinary approach to emotions in knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a comprehensive overview of the most relevant work that has been done in this field in the last decades, see the second and the third volume of Ben-Ze’ev and Krebs (2018).

  2. 2.

    For the conceptualisation of emotions as misguided judgements at the beginning of our philosophical history, see Sorabji (2000). A prominent topic, widely discussed since the antiquity, is the possible contribution of emotions to akrasia (weakness of the will) and self-deception. Many philosophers, and then psychologists, have been dealing with it until now. Exemplary cases for the contemporary philosophical debate on emotions are Rorty (1987) and Mele (2000).

  3. 3.

    For an academic study on emotional intelligence, see Barrett and Salovey (2002).

  4. 4.

    It is important to mention a significant shift in cognitive science from the interactionist models of the late Nineties to the more recent integrationist models for which emotion and cognition are deeply entangled in our mental life. The integrationist model, first developed in neuroscience, is now assumed by many specific research fields, from developmental psychology (Labouvie-Vief 2015) to theories of learning and skilfull behaviour (Gardiner 2015).

  5. 5.

    But this does not mean that there is a general consensus about what our best science says regarding the emotions. In fact, different research programs have been developed throughout the years and the different results are also reflected in the philosophical conceptualisations about them. Some good exemplarsare de Sousa (1987) on the two systems theory (also called “Two-Track Mind”), Griffiths (1997) and DeLancey (2001) on the evolutionary approach and Ekman’s basic emotions, Prinz (2004) in relation to Damasio’s somatic marker hypothesis, and Thagard (2008) on the interactionist model. For a new account on emotions grounded in the new research program of the predictive mind, see Chapter 5.

  6. 6.

    Contemporary philosophy of emotions differentiates between emotions and metacognitive feelings. See Proust (2015) and Carruthers (2017).

  7. 7.

    These are not only historical references to our glorious past since many contemporary approaches have renewed the traditions with novel accounts. For example, consider the prominent Neo-Aristotelian tradition in virtue epistemology (Zagzebski 1996) and the sentimentalist philosophy of mind (Slote 2014), or those approaches that are strictly anchored to the phenomenological tradition, as the ones of Matthew Rattcliffe (2008), Thomas Fuchs (2017), and Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi (2008).

  8. 8.

    For an excellent overview on the history of philosophy of emotions see the new edited volume by Cohen and Stern (2017).

  9. 9.

    Recently Joëlle Proust (2018) has highlighted the importance of looking at epistemic activities for grasping the social dimensions of knowledge and thus for developping what it has been called socially extendedepistemology. In this volume, especially in Chapters 1113, we show how much the understanding of shared/collective emotions matter for this enterprise.

  10. 10.

    It should be noted that this thesis could be assumed in many different ways, from one more apt to relate it to desires and hedonic levels (Helm 2001; Oddie 2005) to the ones that look at affects as the basic components of constructed emotions (Barrett2017). These differences partially depend on the very much debated topic of emotional valence in affective science (for an overview of the issue, see Colombetti2005). The thesis for which emotions disclose values (Johnston 2001) can also be used for explaining the analogy between perception and emotions—as perceptions are directed to objects, emotions are directed to values (Sauer 2012)—and can be articulated within different versions of intentionalism, as it has been recently argued by Vanello (2018). This thesis can be taken in functional terms too, and thus arguing that emotions are not a type of perception, but they function as perceptions (Price 2015).

  11. 11.

    It is important to notice that the topic of the intentionality of emotions related to their fittingness has been one of the most debated since the pioneer book by Kenny (1963).

  12. 12.

    An important contribution to this debate is forthcoming, the Routledge Handbook of phenomenology of emotions (Szanto and Landweer, forthcoming).

  13. 13.

    It is important to notice that one of the main reasons of scepticism regarding a positive role of emotions in knowledge in our philosophical tradition has been exactly their subjective and private dimension that seems to be against the objective standards of knowledge. For an overview of the conceptualisation of emotions as subjective, see Calhoun (2004).

  14. 14.

    This claim, that is strictly related to the cognitive account on the rationality of emotions, has been discussed well beyond the boundaries of the philosophical circles, notably in the Neo-Aristotelian affective turn in education (Nussbaum 1995; Kristjánsson 2018), but also in decision theory and economics (Kirman et al. 2010). But altought this widespread interest, the capacity to be responsible over our emotions is still controversial, especially if emotions are not conceptualized as cognitive, but as unbiden automatic responses that make us lose reason (Elster 1999,2010).

  15. 15.

    It should be noted that the feminist reflection on emotions has been mostly pursued within the field of political philosophy and cultural studies (see, for example, Mendus 2000; Ahmed 2014). However, I think that the prominent research activity pursued by feminist epistemology and philosophy of science can be a valid and challenging reference for addressing the topic of emotions in knowledge too.

  16. 16.

    For an overview of the psychological literature about the role played by the affects in self-disclosure, see Forgas and Moylan (2002).

References

  • Ahmed, S. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L., and E. Potter (eds.). 1992. Feminist Epistemologies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L.F. 2017. How Emotions Are Made: The Secret Life of the Brain. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L.F., and P. Salovey (eds.). 2002. The Wisdom in Feeling: Psychological Processes in Emotional Intelligence. New York and London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev, A., and A. Krebs (eds.). 2018. Philosophy of Emotion, vol. 5. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. 2013. Emotional Insight: The Epistemic Role of Emotional Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Emotion: The Basics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, G., and D. Kuenzle. 2008. A New Role for Emotions in Epistemology? In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, and D. Kuenzle, 1–32. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brun, G., U. Doğuoğlu, and D. Kuenzle (eds.). 2008. Epistemology and Emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. 2004. Subjectivity and Emotion. In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon, 107–121. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candiotto, L. 2016. Extended Affectivity as the Cognition of the Primary Intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and Mind 11: 232–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Epistemic Emotions: The Building Blocks of Intellectual Virtues. Studi di Estetica, XLV, IV SERIE 7: 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. The Route of Goodness: Epistemic Emotions, Self-Realization, and Perfection. Thaumàzein 4: 243–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. 2017. Are Epistemic Emotions Metacognitive? Philosophical Psychology 30 (1–2): 58–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. 1992. Taking Subjectivity into Account. In Feminist Epistemologies, ed. L. Alcoff and E. Potter, 15–48. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., and R. Stern (eds.). 2017. Thinking About the Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, G. 2005. Appraising Valence. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12 (8:10): 103–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Extending the Extended Mind: The Case for Extended Affectivity. Philosophical Studies 172 (5): 1243–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombetti, G., and J. Krueger. 2015. Scaffoldings of the Affective Mind. Philosophical Psychology 28 (8): 1157–1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Arms, J., and D. Jacobson. 2000. The Moralistic Fallacy: On the ‘Appropriateness’ of Emotions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1): 65–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human brain. New York: Avon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jaegher, H. 2015. How We Affect Each Other: Michel Henry’s ‘Pathos-With’ and the Enactive Approach to Intersubjectivity. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (1–2): 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLancey, C. 2001. Passionate Engines: What Emotions Reveal About Mind and Artificial intelliGence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Monticelli, R. 2015. The Sensibility of Reason: Outline of a Phenomenology of Feeling. Thaumàzein 3: 139–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deonna, J.A., and F. Teroni. 2012. The Emotions: A Philosophical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Depraz, N. 2008. The Rainbow of Emotions: At the Crossroads of Neurobiology and Phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review 41 (2): 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa, R. 1987. The Rationality of Emotion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Modeling Rationality: A Normative or Descriptive Task? In Modeling Rationality, Morality and Evolution, ed. P. A. Danielson, 119–134. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, S. 2007. Seeing What to Do. Affective Perception and Rational Motivation. Dialectica 61 (3): 363–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgin, C. 1996. Considered Judgment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —— 2008. Emotion and Understanding. In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, and D. Kuenzle, 33–49. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R.D. 2005. Curious Emotions: Roots of Consciousness and Personality in Motivated Action. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1999. Strong Feelings: Emotion, Addiction and Human Behaviour. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 2010. Self-Poisoning of the Mind. Philosophical Transactions B 365: 221–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forgas, J.P., and S.J. Moylan. 2002. Affective Influences on Self-Perception and Self-Disclosure. In The Social Self: Cognitive, Interpersonal and Intergroup Perspectives, ed. J.P. Forgas and K.D. Williams, 73–96. New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. 2017. Ecology of the Brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T., and H. De Jaegher. 2009. Enactive Intersubjectivity: Participatory Sense-Making and Mutual Incorporation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8 (4): 465–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T., and S. Koch. 2014. Embodied Affectivity: On Moving and Being Moved. Frontiers in Psychology 5 (508): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., and D. Zahavi. 2008. The Phenomenological Mind. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, M.F. 2015. Integration of Cognition and Emotion in Physical and Mental Actions in Musical and Other Behaviours. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 38: e76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P. 2000. The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Emotion, Feeling, and Knowledge of the World. In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. R. Solomon, 91–106. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Seeing What Is the Kind of Thing to Do: Perception and Emotion in Morality. Dialectica 61(3): 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. (ed.). 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N., and C.Z. Elgin. 1988. Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.R., T.S. Braver, and M.E. Raichle. 2002. Integration of Emotion and Cognition in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 4115–4120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenspan, P. 2003. Emotions, Rationality, and Mind-Body. In Philosophy and the Emotions, ed. A. Hatzimoysis, 113–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. 1997. What Emotions Really Are: The Problem of Psychological Categories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P., and A. Scarantino. 2008. Emotions in the Wild: The Situated Perspective on Emotions. In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, ed. P. Robbins and M. Aydede, 437–453. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzimoysis, A. 2003. Emotional Feelings and Intentionalism. In Philosophy and the Emotions, ed. A. Hatzimoysis, 105–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, B. 2001. Emotional Reason: Deliberation, Motivation, and the Nature of Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hookway, C. 1990. Skepticism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Regulating Inquiry: Virtue, Doubt, and Sentiment. In Knowledge, Belief, and Character, ed. G. Axtell, 149–160. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Affective States and Epistemic Immediacy. In Moral & Epistemic Virtues, ed. M. Brady and D. Pritchard, 75–92. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaggar, A. 1989. Love and Knowledge: Emotion in Feminist Epistemology. Inquiry 32 (2): 151–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. 2001. The Authority of Affect. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 181–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A., P. Livet, and M. Teschl (eds.). 2010. Rationality and Emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365 (1538).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristjánsson, K. 2018. Virtuous Emotions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, J., and T. Szanto. 2016. Extended Emotions. Philosophical Compass 11 (12): 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labouvie-Vief, G. 2015. Integrating Cognition and Emotion Throughout the LifeSpan. Cham, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, and New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Livet, P. 2016. Emotions, Beliefs, and Revisions. Emotion Review 8 (3): 240–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele, A. 2000. Self-Deception and Emotion. Consciousness & Emotion 1 (1): 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendus, S. 2000. Feminism and Emotion: Readings in Moral and Political Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Montague, M. 2009. The Logic, Intentionality, and Phenomenology of Emotion. Philosophical Studies 145 (2): 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Evaluative Phenomenology. In Emotions and Value, ed. S. Roeser and C. Todd, 32–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. 2010. Epistemic Emotions. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, ed. P. Goldie, 385–399. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K. 2010. Emotions and Values. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion, ed. P. Goldie, 475–500. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. 1995. Emotions and Women’s Capabilities. In Women, Culture, and Development: A Study of Human Capabilities, ed. M. Nussbaum and J. Glover, 360–395. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Emotions as Judgments of Value and Importance. In Thinking About Feeling: Contemporary Philosophers on Emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon, 183–99. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie, G. 2005. Value, Reality and Desire. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. 2008. On the Relationship Between Emotion and Cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9:148–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Cognitive-Emotional Brain: From Interactions to Integration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petitmengin, C. 2007. Towards the Source of Thoughts: The Gestural and Transmodal Dimension of Lived Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (3): 54–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. 2015. Emotion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. 2004. Gut Reactions: A Perceptual Theory of Emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Protevi, J. 2009. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. 2015. The Representational Structure of Feelings. In Open Mind, ed. T. Metzinger and J.M. Windt, Chapter 31. Frankfurt am Main: Mind Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. 2018. Consensus as an Epistemic Norm of Group Acceptance. In Socially Extended Epistemology, ed. J.A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S.O. Palermos, and D. Pritchard, 132–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. 2008. Feelings of Being: Phenomenology, Psychiatry and the Sense of Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R.C. 2003. Emotions: An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S. 2011. Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. Socially Extended Deliberations About Risks: A Role for Emotions and Arts. In Socially Extended Epistemology, ed. J.A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S.O. Palermos, and D. Pritchard, 158–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S., and C. Todd. 2014. Emotions and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, A. 1978. Explaining Emotions. The Journal of Philosophy 75 (3): 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmela, M. 2012. Shared Emotions. Philosophical Explorations 15(1): 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. True Emotions. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, H. 2012. Psychopaths and Filthy Desks: Are Emotions Necessary and Sufficient for Moral Judgment? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1): 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skellekens, E., and P. Goldie (eds.). 2011. The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, I. 2008. Affective Intentionality and the Feeling Body. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 7(4): 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Emotions and the Extended Mind. In Collective Emotions, ed. M. Salmela and C. von Scheve, 32–46. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, I., and P. Wüschner. 2014. Emotions and Agency. In Emotions and Value, ed. S. Roeser and C. Todd, 212–228. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaby, I., A. Paskaleva, and A. Stephan. 2013. Enactive Emotion and Impaired Agency in Depression. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (7–8): 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. 2007. True to Our Feelings: What Our Emotions Are Really Telling Us. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. 1976. The Passions. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Not Passion’s Slave: Emotions and Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. A Sentimentalist Theory of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind: From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation: The Gifford Lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanto, T., and H. Landweer (eds.). Forthcoming. The Routledge Handbook of Phenomenology of Emotions. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanesini, A. 2008. Virtues, Emotions, and Fallibilism. In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, and D. Kuenzle, 67–82. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappolet, C. 2000. Emotions et valeurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Emotions, Perceptions, and Emotional Illusions. In Perceptual Illusions: Philosophical and Psychological Essays, ed. C. Calabi, 207–224. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. 2008. How Cognition Meets Emotion: Beliefs, Desires and Feelings as Neural Activity. In Epistemology and Emotions, ed. G. Brun, U. Doğuoğlu, and D. Kuenzle, 163–184. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, C. 2014. Relatively Fitting Emotions and Apparently Objective Values. In Emotions and Values, ed. S. Roeser and C. Todd, 90–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanello, D. 2018. Affect, Perceptual Experience, and Disclosure. Philosophical Studies 175: 2125–2144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilutzky, W. 2015. Emotions as Pragmatic and Epistemic Actions. Frontiers in Psychology 6: Article 1593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, L. 1996. Virtues of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Emotion and Moral Judgement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1): 104–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. 2015. You, Me, and We: The Sharing of Emotional Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (1–2): 84–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Candiotto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Candiotto, L. (2019). From Philosophy of Emotion to Epistemology: Some Questions About the Epistemic Relevance of Emotions. In: Candiotto, L. (eds) The Value of Emotions for Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15667-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics