Abstract
Individuals in the strict sense do not exist in quantum physics. This paper argues that unsharp observables, almost repeatable and weakly disturbing measurements allow for the definition of unsharp individuals which is sufficient for all practical purposes. Many quantum physical experiments and the obvious existence of individuals in the classical world can be explained in this way. On the other hand, if quantum mechanics is considered as universally valid then there is no classical world in the strict sense. The paper includes a Divertimento on an analogy between the motion of individual quantum systems and the motion of angels according to the treatment of Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica.
Peter Mittlestatedt (deceased, 2014) was Professor of Physics at the University of Cologne, Germany.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Frede and Patzig (1988).
- 2.
Cf. Wieland (1973).
- 3.
Cf., e.g., Johannes Philoponos. De opificio miindi, 1.10 ff., Herder, Freiburg, (1977).
- 4.
English translation by Fathers of the English Domenican Province. Westininstei (Maryland), 1981.
- 5.
But an angel is not in a place as commensurate and contained, but rather as containing it. Neither then is the local movement of an angel commensurate with place: ...; in fact it may he either continuous or not.
- 6.
But if an angel’s movement is not continuous, it is possible for him to pass from one extreme to another without going through the middle.
- 7.
So an angel can be in one place (x) in one instant (t), and in another place (x′, x′ ≠ x) in the next instant (t’) without any time intervening (t – t′ = +0). (Formulas are added by the author).
- 8.
In order to avoid that the angel is omnipresent, in Questio 53.3 “nullo tempore” must be understood such that t – t’ = +0, i. e., the time difference is arbitrary small but positive.
- 9.
…he is in one place, in such a manner that he is not in another.
- 10.
The movement of an angel in a place is nothing else than the various contacts of various places successively but not at once.
- 11.
G.W. Leibniz, Discourse de Metaphysique, 9. (GP IV, p. 433).
- 12.
More details about this point can be found in E. Castellani and P. Mittelstaedt (1998).
- 13.
G. W. Leibniz, Nouveaux Essais sur l’entendement humain, Chap. XXVII, § 3. (GP V, p. 214).
- 14.
I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, A 272.
- 15.
I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, B 600.
- 16.
Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, A 272.
- 17.
Weyl (1966).
- 18.
- 19.
Hegerfeld and Ruijsenaars (1980).
- 20.
Schlieder (1968).
- 21.
Schlieder (1968).
- 22.
Schlieder (1968).
- 23.
Piron (1976).
- 24.
Heisenberg (1930).
- 25.
- 26.
Aharanov and Albert (1984).
- 27.
- 28.
References
Aharonov, Y., & Albert, D. (1984). Is the usual notion of time evolution adequate for quantum mechanical systems I. Physics Review D, 29, 223–227.
Bunch, P., Grabowski, M., & Lahti, P. (1995). Operational quantum physics. Heidelberg: Springer.
Bunch, P., Lahti, P., & Mittelstaedt, P. (1996). The quantum theory of measurement (2nd. ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.
Castellani, E., & Mittelstaedt, P. (1998). Leibniz’ principle, physics, and the language of physics. Foundations of Physics, 30, 1587–1604.
Dally Chiara, M. L. (1995). Unsharp quantum logics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 34, 1331–1336.
Frede, M., & Patzig, G. (1988). Aristoteles “Metaphysik Z” (2 Vol.) C.H. Beck, Miinchen.
Giuntini, R. (1995). Quasilinear QMV algebras. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 34, 1397–1407.
Hegerfeld, G. C., & Ruijsenaars, S. N. M. (1980). Remarks on causality, localization and speeding of wave packets. Physics Review D, 22, 377–384.
Heisenberg, W. (1930). Die physikalischen Prinzipien der Quantentheorie. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
Islam, C. J. (1994). Quantum logic and the history approach to quantum theory. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 35, 2157–2185.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1983). Relativistic quantum logic. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 22, 293–313.
Mittelstaedt, R. (1984). Constituting, naming, and identity in quantum logic. In Recent developments in quantum logic (pp. 215–234). Mannheim: B.I. Wissenschaftsvedag.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1994). The constitution of objects in Kant’s philosophy and in modern physics. In P. Parrini (Ed.), Kant and contemporary epistemology (pp. 115–129). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mittelstaedt, P. (1995). Constitution of objects in classical mechanics and in quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 34, 1615–1626.
Piron, C. (1976). Foundations of quantum physics (p. 93 ff, 77–90). Reading: Benjamin.
Schlieder, S. (1968). Einige Bemerkungen zu Zustandsanderungen von relativistischen quanten-mechanischen Systemen durch Messung and zur Lukalitatsforderung. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 7, 303–331.
Stachow, E.-W. (1985). Structures of quantum language for individual systems. In Recent developments in quantum logic (pp. 129–145). Mannheim: B.I. Wissenschaftsverlag.
Strohmeyer, I. (1995). Quantentheorie und Transzendentalphilosophie. Heidelberg: Spektrum.
Weyl, H. (1966). Philosophie der Mathematik und der Naturwissenschaften, Oldenburg.
Wieland, W. (1973). Kontinuum and Engelszeit bei Thomas von Aquino. In: E. Scheibe u. G. Siiflmann (Eds.), Einheit und Vielheit. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Rupprecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mittlestatedt, P. (2019). The Problem of Individualism from Greek Thought to Quantum Physics. In: Cordero, A. (eds) Philosophers Look at Quantum Mechanics. Synthese Library, vol 406. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15659-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15659-6_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15658-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15659-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)