Advertisement

Characteristics of Game Transfer Phenomena in Location-Based Augmented Reality Games

  • Angelica B. Ortiz de GortariEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores sensory perceptions, cognitive mix-ups and slips of actions associated with augmented reality (AR) technologies, such as in location-based AR games. The research on Game Transfer Phenomena (GTP) has demonstrated that playing video games in AR and non-AR can induce sensory perceptions, manifesting as seeing images overlaying physical objects (e.g., seeing power bars above people’s heads or maps in the corner of the eye), hearing sounds coming from game-related objects, and perceiving physical objects as distorted or having misperceptions (e.g., confusing birds with aeroplanes). The aim of this chapter is twofold. The first is to provide an overview of the GTP research conducted on location-based AR games. The second is to highlight the peculiarities of GTP in AR games. While a broad variety of the GTP reported in non-AR games has also been found in location-based AR games, the key characteristic of these games is that the gameplay occurs through interactions in the physical context. The physical context is part of the game by means of (i) the overlaying of game images on the physical context and (ii) the game being played through interactions in the physical context. The key peculiarities of GTP in these games are (i) the temporal manifestation of GTP while/after playing, (ii) the two-way transfer of effects from the virtual to the physical and vice versa, (iii) the increased chances of the occurrence of certain forms of GTP (e.g., the urge to do something related to the game, misperceptions of physical stimuli, tactile sensations) including cognitive mix-ups and slips of actions when confusing virtual objects with real objects and (iv) the GTP triggered by the outputs from a multipurpose device.

References

  1. Adee S (2018, 27 December 2018) Consensual hallucination. Retrieved January 2019, from http://www.lastwordonnothing.com/2018/12/27/winter-theme-week-consensual
  2. Althoff T, White RW, Horvitz E (2016) Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity: study and implications. J Med Internet Res 18(12):e315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bayer JB, Dal Cin S, Campbell SW, Panek E (2016) Consciousness and self-regulation in mobile communication. Hum Commun Res 42(1):71–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonus JA, Peebles A, Mares M-L, Sarmiento IG (2017) Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokémon Go as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychol 21(2):1–25Google Scholar
  5. Craig AB (2013) Understanding augmented reality: concepts and applications. Elsevier, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. DeSalle R (2018) Our senses: an immersive experience. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  7. Dindar M, Ortiz de Gortari AB (2017) Turkish Validation of the Game Transfer Phenomena Scale (GTPS): measuring altered perceptions, automatic mental processes and actions and behaviours associated with playing video games. Telemat Inf 34(8):1802–1813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gackenbach J, Trewin C (2017) Pokémon Go and dreams: from virtual to augmented reality in gaming and dreams. In: Paper presented at the International Association for the Study of Dreams, Anaheim, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerra G, Zaimovic A, Franchini D, Palladino M, Giucastro G, Reali N, Brambilla F (1998) Neuroendocrine responses of healthy volunteers to ‘techno-music’: relationships with personality traits and emotional state. Int J Psychophysiol 28(1):99–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Howe KB, Suharlim C, Ueda P, Howe D, Kawachi I, Rimm EB (2016) Gotta catch’em all! Pokémon GO and physical activity among young adults: difference in differences study. BMJ 355:i6270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jennett C, Cox AL, Cairns P, Dhoparee S, Epps A, Tijs T, Walton A (2008) Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int J Hum Comput Stud 66(9):641–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joseph B, Armstrong DG (2016) Potential perils of peri-Pokémon perambulation: the dark reality of augmented reality? Oxford Med Case Rep 2016(10), omw080-omw080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kipper G, Rampolla J (2012) Augmented reality: an emerging technologies guide to AR. Elsevier, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  14. Norman DA (1981) Categorization of action slips. Psychol Rev 88(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ortiz de Gortari AB (2015) Exploring Game Transfer Phenomena: a multimodal research approach for investigating video games’ effects. Doctor of Philosophy, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Ortiz de Gortari AB (2017) Empirical study on Game Transfer Phenomena in a location-based augmented reality game. Telemat Inf 35(2):382–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ortiz de Gortari AB (2018) First insights into applying the Game Transfer Phenomena framework for positive means. In: Cipresso P, Serino S, Ostrovsky Y, Baker JT (eds) Pervasive computing paradigms for mental health (vol 253). Springer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  18. Ortiz de Gortari AB (2019) Game Transfer Phenomena: origin, development and contributions to the videogame research field. In: Attrill-Smith A, Fullwood C, Kuss D, Keep M (eds) Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortiz de Gortari AB (under review) Game Transfer Phenomena in Pokémon Go: factors related to problematic smartphone gamingGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz de Gortari AB, Griffiths MD (2015) Game Transfer Phenomena and its associated factors: an exploratory empirical online survey study. Comput Hum Behav 51:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ortiz de Gortari AB, Griffiths MD (2016) Prevalence and characteristics of Game Transfer Phenomena: a descriptive survey study. Int J Hum-Comput Interact 32(6):470–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ortiz de Gortari AB, Larøi F (2018) Broadening the understanding of the psychopathology of gaming: the relation between involuntary behaviours, sensorial and cognitive intrusions with videogame content and Internet Gaming Disorder. In: Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Behavioural Addictions, Colon, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  23. Ortiz de Gortari AB, Oldfield B, Griffiths MD (2016) An empirical examination of factors associated with Game Transfer Phenomena severity. Comput Hum Behav 64:274–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rasche P, Schlomann A, Mertens A (2017) Who is still playing Pokemon Go? A web-based survey. JMIR Serious Games 5(2):e7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sánchez A (1997) Territorios virtuales. De Internet hacia un nuevo concepto de la simulación. Taurus, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  26. Sekhavat Y, Zarei H (2016) Enhancing the sense of immersion and quality of experience in mobile games using augmented reality. J Comput Secur 3(1):53–62Google Scholar
  27. Serino M, Cordrey K, McLaughlin L, Milanaik RL (2016) Pokémon Go and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Curr Opin Pediatr 28(5):673–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sifonis CM (2018) Examining Game Transfer Phenomena in the hybrid reality game, Ingress. Int J Human–Computer Interact 1–12Google Scholar
  29. Tafalla RJ (2007) Gender differences in cardiovascular reactivity and game performance related to sensory modality in violent video game play. J Appl Soc Psychol 37(9):2008–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tateno M, Skokauskas N, Kato TA, Teo AR, Guerrero APS (2016) New game software (Pokémon Go) may help youth with severe social withdrawal, hikikomori. Psychiatry Res 246:848–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Turner S (2016) Game Transfer Phenomena: the original AR. Unwinnable Monthly, 3Google Scholar
  32. Wagner-Greene VR, Wotring AJ, Castor T, Kruger J, Dake JA, Mortemore S (2017) Pokémon GO: healthy or harmful? Am J Public Health 107(1):35–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wittek CT, Finserås TR, Pallesen S, Mentzoni RA, Hanss D, Griffiths MD, Molde H (2016) Prevalence and predictors of video game addiction: a study based on a national representative sample of gamers. Int J Ment Health Addict 14(5):672–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wong FY (2017) Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: a cross-sectional study. Int J Health Geogr 16(1):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang C-C, Liu D (2017) Motives matter: motives for playing Pokémon Go and implications for well-being. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 20(1):52–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology and Neuroscience of Cognition Research UnitUniversity of LiègeLiègeBelgium

Personalised recommendations