Methodical Approach to Extraction Results Diagnostics of Innovation and Resource Potential in the Russian Federation Territories

  • O. M. GolembiovskayaEmail author
  • M. A. Gundorova
  • Z. V. Mishchenko
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 138)


The article reveals scientific trends in the study of high-tech processes in the territories. It substantiates the advantages and disadvantages of existing approaches. The author proposes and tests the methodology for diagnosing the level of innovative resource potential of the Russian territories. On the basis of official statistics, there are made calculations of current, average and dynamic results of developing regions and federal district. There is constructed the model of distributing the Russian Federation territories in the main components space on a complex of innovation-resource indicators. There is given the values dispersion estimation of the most important indicators for a long period of time. There is revealed the interrelation between economic and infrastructural factors. There are investigated the threats of the state strong interregional imbalances. There are grounded the priority directions of developing depressed areas in the Russian Federation. There are defined the possibilities of applying the developed methodical approach for scientific, educational and power structures.


Regions and federal districts Innovation and resource potential Performance indicators Interregional imbalances Dynamics Interrelation of factors 


  1. 1.
    Kormishkina, L.A., Koloskov, D.A.: Innovation approaches to the formation of investment policy tools from the perspective of a neo-industrial economic development paradigm. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. T. 10. No. 6, pp. 226–228 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Federal State Statistics Service: [site]. Address date 08.04.2018
  3. 3.
    Fraimovich, D.Y., Mishchenko, Z.V.: Innovative dynamics of functioning the Russian Federation subjects. National service. No. 6(74), p. 23 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arbuzov, S.G.: Types of territorial disparities, their role and mechanisms of influence on forming economic safety threats. Vestnik of Economics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 2. P. 137, pp. 130–138 (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gubanova, E.S., Kleshch, V.S.: Methodological aspects in analyzing the level of non-uniformity of socio-economic development of regions. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. T. 10. No. 1. P. 68, C. 58–75 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ivanter, V.V., Porfiryev, B.N., Shurov, A.A., Shokin, I.N.: Fundamentals of structural and investment policy in modern Russian conditions. Vestnik finansovogo universiteta. No. 1. P. 8 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alekseev, S.G.: The innovative potential of a region: an integrated assessment and the mechanism of development: Ph.D. thesis in Economics: 08.00.05, 198 p. (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andreev, Yu.N.: Monitoring of regional science and technology policy. Regional Studies: Scientific-Journalistic Magazine. no. 3 (52), pp. 89–105 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bortnik, I.M., Senchenya, G.I., Miheeva, N.N.: i dr. Assessment and monitoring of innovation development of Russian regions. Innovations, no. 9(167), pp. 48–61 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bykova, A.A., Molodchik, M.A.: Problems of region positioning in the new economy. Innovations, no. 1, pp. 66–72 (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hollanders, H., Derbyshire, J., Lewney, R., Tijssen, R., Tarantola, S., Rivera Léon, L.: Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2012 — Methodology report. Brussels: European Commission, DG Enterprise (2012a).–834_en.htm
  12. 12.
    Florida, R.: Creative class: people who change the future. Moscow, Klassika-XXI, 430 p. (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aganbegyan, A.G.: Investments into fixed capital and investments into the human capital – two interconnected sources of social and economic growth. Problemy prognozirovaniya. No. 4, pp. 17–20 (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donichev, O.A., Mishchenko, Z.V., Frajmovich, D.Yu.: Complex of economic-mathematical indicators in assessment of modernization capacity of regions of the federal district. Finansovaya analitika: problemy i resheniya, No. 44(86), pp. 42−49 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komkov, N.I. Scientific and technological development: restrictions and opportunities. Problemy prognozirovaniya, No. 5, pp. 11–21 (2017)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frajmovich, D.Yu., Gundorova, M.A., Mishchenko, Z.V.: Diagnostics of results of development of innovative and resource potential in federal districts of Russian Federation. Gosudarstvennaya sluzhba. T. 19. No. 4(108), pp. 49–54 (2017)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azgaldov, G.G.: Inequality in income: well or badly? Innovations. No. 5, pp. 15–17 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakhtizin, A.R., Bukhvald, E.M., Kolchugina, A.V.: Alignment of regions of Russia: illusions of the program and reality of economy. Messenger of Institute of economy of RAS. No. 1, pp. 76–91 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ilyin, V.A., Uskova, T.V.: Methods of overcoming spatial social and economic differentiation. Federalism. No. 3, pp. 7–18 (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolomak, E.A.: Uneven spatial development in Russia: explanations of new economic geography. Economy Questions. No. 2. pp. 132–150 (2013)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hodachek, V.M.: Territorial Department the national economy in modern conditions. Scientific works of Northwest academy of public service. T. 2. Issue 3, pp. 268–281 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. M. Golembiovskaya
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. A. Gundorova
    • 2
  • Z. V. Mishchenko
    • 2
  1. 1.Bryansk State Technical UniversityBryanskRussia
  2. 2.Vladimir State University named after Alexander and Nikolay StoletovsVladimirRussia

Personalised recommendations