Information Opacity and Investment Attractiveness of Enterprises

  • I. Kapkaev
  • D. Sorokin
  • V. LeshininaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 138)


The purpose of our research is to assess the impact of the quality of financial information on investment attractiveness. The article considers the main factors influencing the objectivity of the financial statements. The risk description is given special attention to the users of the financial statements.

Method: The article considers basic theoretical approaches that emerged in modern science to identify distortion of objectivity of the financial information. We conduct a detailed review of the articles on the research issues, which form the methodological base of the study, both primary and secondary sources of information are considered to ascertain how the distortion of information was detected and what actions should be taken to identify it. The practical significance of the research is that the aspects examined allow us to assess the extent of the problem; to the formulate ways of its elimination and control that can become the basis for the formation of favorable investment climate. The scientific value research is that it can be used by managers, auditors, investors to identify cases of intentional distortion of information in accounting; the study includes a description of typical situations in which a poor reflection of information leads to duplication of data, as well as a description of the main features of window dressing of financial statements and falsification of information used in the Russian practice.


Distortion of information Financial statements Falsification Investment climate Investments Window dressing of financial statements 


  1. 1.
    Russian Accounting Standard “Accounting Policy of an Organization (RAS 4/99)”.
  2. 2.
    Gračanin, Š., Kalač, E.: The impact of fair value accounting on the crisis in banking sector of EU and USA. Ekon. Istraz. 24(2), 126–153 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granja, J.: Disclosure regulation in the commercial banking industry: lessons from the national banking era. J. Account. Res. 56(1), 173–216 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abad, D., Sánchez-Ballesta, J.P., Yagüe, J.: Audit opinions and information asymmetry in the stock market. Account. Financ. 57(2), 565–595 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, A.S., Safdar, I.: Dissecting stock price momentum using financial statement analysis. Account. Financ. (in press)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hegde, S., Zhou, T.: Predicting accounting misconduct: the role of firm-level investor optimism. J. Bus. Ethics, 1–28 (2018)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klein, A.: Discussion of “Financial Statement Comparability and the Efficiency of Acquisition Decisions”. Contemp. Account. Res. 35(1), 203–210 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Newman, W., Mhaka, C., Katiyo, E.M., Ongayi, W., Milondzo, K.: An evaluation of the effectiveness of financial statements in disclosing true business performance to stakeholders in hospitality industry (A case of Lester-Lesley limited). Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J. 21(3), 1–22 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donelson, D.C., Jennings, R., Mcinnis, J.: Financial statement quality and debt contracting: evidence from a survey of commercial lenders. Contemp. Account. Res. 34(4), 2051–2093 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Giner Inchausti, B., Iñiguez Sanchez, R., Poveda Fuentes, F.: Does the interaction between the accounting method choice and disclosure affect financial analysts’ information environment? The case of joint ventures under IAS 31. Rev. Esp. Financ. Contab. 46(3), 298–326 (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, Y.-H., Lin, S., Fornaro, J.M., Huang, H.-W.S.: Fair value measurement and accounting restatements. Adv. Account. 38, 30–45 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zulu, M., de Klerk, M., Oberholster, J.G.I.: A comparison of the value relevance of interim and annual financial statements. S. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 20(1), 1498 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neel, M.: Accounting comparability and economic outcomes of mandatory IFRS adoption. Contemp. Account. Res. 34(1), 658–690 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Al-Htaybat, K., von Alberti-Alhtaybat, L.: Big data and corporate reporting: impacts and paradoxes. Account. Audit. Account. J. 30(4), 850–873 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fang, V.W., Huang, A.H., Wang, W.: Imperfect accounting and reporting bias. J. Account. Res. 55(4), 919–962 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lisowsky, P., Minnis, M., Sutherland, A.: Economic growth and financial statement verification. J. Account. Res. 55(4), 745–794 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hansen, J.C., Hong, K.P., Park, S.-H.: Accounting conservatism: a life cycle perspective. Adv. Account. 40, 76–88 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pascual-Ezama, D., Paredes, M.R., Sanchez-Martín, M.-D.-P., de Liaño, B.G.-G.: Shorter and easier is more useful: a longitudinal analysis of how financial report enforcement affects individual investors. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 74, 29–37 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jin, Y., McConomy, B.J., Xu, B.: The Impact of IFRS adoption on an Agribusiness company’s financial statements. Account. Perspect. 16(4), 429–434 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vallišová, L., Dvoáková, L.: Implementation of international financial accounting standards from the perspective of companies in the Czech Republic. Econ. Ann. XXI 167(9–10), 70–74 (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vladu, A.B., Amat, O., Cuzdriorean, D.D.: Truthfulness in accounting: how to discriminate accounting manipulators from non-manipulators. J. Bus. Ethics 140(4), 633–648 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sun, L., Ren, L.-L.: Research on the accounting fraud approaches of listed companies in China. Glob. Bus. Financ. Rev. 22(1), 1–7 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar, S.B., Goyal, V., Mitra, S.K.: Do Indian firms manage earning numbers? An empirical investigation. Acad. Account. Financ. Stud. J. 22(1), 1–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agyenim-Boateng, C., Stafford, A., Stapleton, P.: The role of structure in manipulating PPP accountability. Account. Audit. Account. J. 30(1), 119–144 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Polisyuk, G.B.: Buhgalterskaya (finansovaya) otchetnost’: problemy vyyavleniya iskazheniya informacii [Translit]. EHkonomicheskij analiz: teoriya i praktika, vol. 46(301) (2012).
  26. 26.
    Averina, O.I.: Iskazhenie buhgalterskoj otchetnosti kak faktor riska ee pol’zovatelej [Translit]. Sistemnoe upravlenie, vol. 4, Charged with Accounting Fraud (2013).
  27. 27.
    Sardarova, B.M.: Moshennichestvo s finansovoj otchetnost’yu. Obzor sudebnyh razbiratel’stv za 2016 god [Translit]. Korporativnaya finansovaya otchyotnost’: ZHurnal i prakticheskie razrabotki po MSFO i upravlencheskomu uchetu, Charged with Accounting Fraud.
  28. 28.
    Kapkaev, I., Sorokin, D.: The implementation of the comfortable investment environment on the basis of the effectiveness assessment of the corporation. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 238, 697–703 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Nikolaeva, E., Pletnev, D.: Successful practices of Russian medium-sized enterprises. In: Eurasian Business Perspectives: Proceedings of the 20th Eurasia Business and Economics Society Conference, vol. 1, pp. 131–140. Springer, Cham (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lokanan, M.E.: How senior managers perpetuate accounting fraud? Lessons for fraud examiners from an instructional case. J. Financ. Crime 21(4), 411–423 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Miller Energy Resources, Former CFO, current COO Charged with Accounting Fraud.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chelyabinsk State UniversityChelyabinskRussia

Personalised recommendations