Skip to main content

Designing Products for the Circular Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technology-Driven Sustainability

Abstract

Until recent years, apparel product design was undertaken with very little reference to environmental sustainability. However, the legislative framework has increasingly constrained design decisions related to the use of hazardous chemicals, especially with the advent of REACH regulations within the EU. Most companies now recognise a large number of chemical substances that are prohibited in the dyeing and finishing of textiles. This dominates thinking about design for the environment. The increasing adoption of environmental management systems has expanded the vision for initiatives promoting sustainability, including those in laundering and care. Principles are recognised for product design and development that have led to more sustainable goods and services.

In some industries, regulations require producer to take responsibility for the disposal of products that companies release to the market. This obligation has triggered thinking about design for disassembly and design for disposal. This development has accelerated the adoption of circular economy concepts. The EU has not implemented producer responsibility in apparel, although some companies have voluntarily championed circular economy initiatives. However, the business models of most apparel companies have nothing to say about end-of-life issues.

This chapter is concerned with new product development processes that incorporate Design for Environment and Design for Disassembly and Design for Disposal. As there are numerous technical issues to address, a team-based product development process has many advantages, whereby garment designers work alongside specialists from other disciplines. This process requires culture change to be embraced by most brand owners and a departure from the practice of separating the design process from the product development process. In most cases, changes of this nature bring disruption to a globalised industrial sector.

Case studies that illustrate the concepts developed in this chapter will be considered. In particular, the French experience of adopting producer responsibility for apparel goods is considered. The accredited organisation ECO TLC exhibits strength in the promotion of sustainability projects, but there is a fundamental weakness in that culture change in the design process of brand owners is hard to discern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrews, D. (2015). The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy, 30(3), 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhamra, T., Heeley, J., & Tyler, D. (1998). A cross-sectoral approach to new product development. The Design Journal, 1(3), 2–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjørn, A., & Strandesen, M. (2011). The cradle to cradle concept – Is it always sustainable? Poster session presented at The Life Cycle Management (LCM) conference: Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Management, Berlin, Germany. Retrieved September 2018, from http://orbit.dtu.dk/files/6443333/bjoern-the_cradle_to_cradle_concept-733_ax%5BI%5D.pdf.

  • Bocken, N. M. P., Olivetti, E. A., Cullen, J. M., Potting, J., & Lifset, R. (2017). Taking the circularity to the next level: A special issue on the circular economy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 476–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukhari, M. A., Carrasco-Gallego, R., & Ponce-Cueto, E. (2018). Developing a national programme for textiles and clothing recovery. Waste Management & Research, 36(4), 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpet Recycling UK. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.carpetrecyclinguk.com/our_achievements.php.

  • Choi, T. (2017). Environmental impact of voluntary extended producer responsibility: The case of carpet recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor-Crabb, A., Miller, K., & Chapman, J. (2016). Design strategies for the eternal reoccurrence of the new. Fashion Practice, 8(1), 22–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, T., Hill, H., Kininmonth, J., Townsend, K., Hughes, M., Knox, A., et al. (2013). Design for longevity: Guidance on increasing the active life of clothing. WRAP (Waste & Resources Action Programme), Banbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Man, R., & Friege, H. (2016). Circular economy: European policy on shaky ground. Waste Management & Research, 34(2), 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defra. (2011). Environmental Protection Act (Summary). Retrieved September 2018, from http://adlib.everysite.co.uk/adlib/defra/content.aspx?doc=18386&id=18388.

  • Eco TLC. (2018a). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.ecotlc.fr/.

  • Eco TLC. (2018b). Roads to innovation 2018. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.ecotlc.fr/ressources/Documents_site/7_2018_Chemins_Innovation_GB_BD.pdf.

  • Elander, M., Tojo, N, Tekie, H., & Hennlock, M. (2017). Impact assessment of policies promoting fiber-to-fiber recycling of textiles. Vol. 2017:3, Mistra Future Fashion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2014). Towards the circular economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. World Economic Forum, Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ENV_TowardsCircularEconomy_Report_2014.pdf.

  • Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a circular economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015, December 2). Closing the loop: Commission adopts ambitious new Circular Economy Package to boost competitiveness, create jobs and generate sustainable growth. Brussels. Retrieved September 2018, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6203_en.htm.

  • European Commission. (2018a). REACH implementation. Retrieved September 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/reach/implementation_en.htm.

  • European Commission. (2018b, May 22). Circular economy: New rules will make EU the global front-runner in waste management and recycling. Brussels. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-3846_en.htm.

  • Franco, M. A. (2017). Circular economy at the micro level: A dynamic view of incumbents’ struggles and challenges in the textile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168(1), 833–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J. (2017). Carpet recycling UK – Recovering value from carpet fibres. Proceedings of the 6th International Fibre Recycling Symposium, Manchester, June 2017. Paper 18, 7 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016, February). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gracey, F., & Moon, D. (2012). Valuing our clothes: The evidence base. Waste and Resources Action Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilt, A. (2014). A practical guide to sustainable fashion. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heys, R. (2012). The Clean Air Act 1956. BMJ, 345, e5751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, E., Kokke, S., Lundie, D., Shaw, N., Ijomah, W., & Kao, C. (2016, December). Technical solutions to improve global sustainable management of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in the EU and China. Journal of Remanufacturing, 6, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugge, R., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Schifferstein, H. N. J. (2005). Design strategies to postpone consumers’ product replacement: The value of a strong person-product relationship. The Design Journal, 8(2), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niaga. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from https://www.dsm-niaga.com.

  • Niinimäki, K. (2010). Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology. Sustainable Development, 18, 150–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niinimäki, K. (Ed.). (2013). Sustainable fashion: New approaches. Helsinki: Aalto University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Our Common Future. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.

  • Park, H., & Armstrong, C. M. J. (2017). Collaborative apparel consumption in the digital sharing economy: An agenda for academic inquiry. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41(5), 465–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R2Ï€. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.r2piproject.eu/.

  • re:newcell. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from https://renewcell.com/.

  • Relooping Fashion Initiative. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from http://reloopingfashion.org/.

  • Resyntex. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.resyntex.eu/.

  • Sandin, G., & Peters, G. M. (2018). Environmental impact of textile reuse and recycling – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg, J. H., & Lorek, S. (2002). Environmentally sustainable household consumption: From aggregate environmental pressures to priority fields of action. Ecological Economics, 43(2–3), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trash-2-Cash. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from https://www.trash2cashproject.eu/.

  • Tyler, D. J. (Ed.). (2008a). Carr & Latham’s technology of clothing manufacture (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Chapter 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, D. (2008b). Advances in apparel product development. In C. Fairhurst (Ed.), Advances in apparel production (pp. 157–176). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd..

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, D., & Hall, N. (2018, July 23–26). Eco-system services and the circular economy for textiles. The 91st Textile Institute World Conference, Leeds University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velis, C. (2018). No circular economy if current systemic failures are not addressed. Waste Management & Research, 36(9), 757–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Gu, Y., Li, L., Liu, T., Wu, Y., & Zuo, T. (2017). Operating models and development trends in the extended producer responsibility system for waste electrical and electronic equipment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worn Again Technologies. (2018). Retrieved September 2018, from http://wornagain.info/.

  • WRAP. (2018). WRAP and the circular economy. Waste and Resources Action Programme. Retrieved September 2018, from http://www.wrap.org.uk/about-us/about/wrap-and-circular-economy.

  • Zane, D. M., Irwin, J. R., & Reczek, R. W. (2016). Do less ethical consumers denigrate more ethical consumers? The effect of willful ignorance on judgments of others. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David J. Tyler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tyler, D.J., Han, S.LC. (2020). Designing Products for the Circular Economy. In: Vignali, G., Reid, L.F., Ryding, D., Henninger, C.E. (eds) Technology-Driven Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15483-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics