Skip to main content

Ethics in Leadership: Carving Out the Ethical Core in Current Leadership Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 57))

  • 1124 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we carve out the ethical core in transformational, authentic, and ethical leadership theory. Basing our analysis on a meta-framework describing leader character, we distinguish ethical elements contained within each of these theories along the dimensions of locus (a leader’s inner characteristics), transmission (behaviors), and reception (follower perceptions). Our theoretical model enables a more comprehensive view of ethics in leadership beyond isolated leadership traditions, and stimulates valuable insights into how each leadership theory contributes aspects of leader ethics. With respect to managerial implications, we offer systematic guidance for developing ethical leaders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Even though there is no one-size-fits-all definition of leadership, we describe it as “a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others towards the achievement of a goal” (Kruse, 2013, p. 1). Furthermore, we focus on leadership in organizations irrespective of sector, position, or hierarchy level.

  2. 2.

    Whereas Burns (1978) assumes moral behavior as constituent of transformational leadership, Bass (1985) acknowledges that the collective purpose to which transformational leaders refer can also be immoral. As Bass and Avolio (2003) argue, transformational leadership does not per se differentiate between normatively desirable and undesirable outcomes, and thus in principal may also be based on immoral conceptions of a vision and mission that allow for unethical behaviors. Examples are political leaders who transformed their countries, but not necessarily for the better (Trevino & Brown, 2007). This gave rise to a differentiation into authentic compared with self-centered transformational leadership (pseudo-transformational leadership). Bass and Steidlmeier (1999) clarified that true transformational leadership is grounded in “a moral foundation of legitimate values” (p. 184).

  3. 3.

    Shamir and Eilam (2005) characterize authentic leaders as individuals who are true to themselves and do not overly conform to expectations of others, are motivated by their convictions rather than by prestige or other forms of external acknowledgements, are distinctive individuals who have their own points of view and whose behavior is based on their individual values and credo. In contrast, Avolio et al. (2005) specifically encompass a positive moral perspective in their definition of authentic leadership.

  4. 4.

    As Day (2001) outlines, leader development focuses on developing the intra-personal skills of the leader in the areas of self-awareness, self-regulation, and self-motivation, while leadership development comprises interpersonal aspects summarized as social awareness (including, i.e., empathy) and social skills (i.e., team-orientation).

  5. 5.

    Leaders are able to shape situations and to challenge the social constructions they are presented with (Skubinn & Herzog, 2016).

  6. 6.

    The responsible leadership approach is more holistic in the sense that it focuses on four elements of leadership: the leader as a responsible person (person), the roles a responsible leader fulfills (roles), the ethics of the leader–follower relationship (relationship), and the ethics of what a leader does (responsibilities).

References

  • Angus-Leppan, T., Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2010). Leadership styles and CSR practice: An examination of sensemaking, institutional drivers and CSR leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 189–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gibbons, T. C. (1988). Developing transformational leaders: A life span approach. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo, The Jossey-Bass management series. Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness (pp. 276–308). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacha, E., & Walker, S. (2013). The relationship between transformational leadership and followers’ perceptions of fairness. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(3), 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Improving organizational effectiveness trough transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Steidlmeier, P. (1999). Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(2), 181–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City: Mindgarden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Vecchio, R. P. (2007). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (2nd ed., pp. 302–317). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Trevino, L. K. (2014). Do role models matter? An investigation of role modeling as an antecedent of perceived ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(4), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97(2), 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, M. A., & Golden, B. R. (1997). Perceived managerial discretion: A study of cause and effect. Strategic Management Journal, 18(3), 187–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cianci, A. M., Hannah, S. T., Roberts, R. P., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2014). The effects of authentic leadership on followers’ ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study. Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013a). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113(4), 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., Seijts, G., & Gandz, J. (2013b). Developing leadership character in business programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12(2), 285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1994). Set like plaster? Evidence for the stability of adult personality. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 21–40). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development: A review in context. Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 581–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Hoogh, A. H. B., & den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader’s social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates’ optimism: A multi-method study. Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hartog, D. N., & Belschak, F. D. (2012). Work engagement and machiavellianism in the ethical leadership process. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioural theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 7–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deinert, A., Homan, A. C., Boer, D., Voelpel, S. C., & Gutermann, D. (2015). Transformational leadership sub-dimensions and their link to leaders’personality and performance. Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1095–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figurski, T. J. (1987). Self-awareness and other-awareness: The use of perspective in everyday life. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity: Psychosocial perspectives (pp. 197–210). Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Kring, W., Soose, A., & Zempel, J. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 37–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 139–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumba, F. O. (2005). Can you see the real me? A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R.K. (2002). Servant leadership [25th Anniversary ed.]: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, J., & Deady, R. (2013). The art of mental health practice: The role of drama in developing empathy. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 49(2), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K. S., & LaRocca, M. A. (2011). Responsible leadership outcomes via stakeholder CSR values: Testing a values-centered model of transformational leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(1), 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajduk, T., & Schank, C. (2016). The model of the honorable merchant: Bridging compliance and integrity? In A. Sison (Ed.), Handbook of virtue ethics in business and management (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., & Avolio, B. J. (2011). The locus of leader character. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 979–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & May, D. R. (2011). Moral maturation ans moral conation: A capacity approach to explaining moral thought and action. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 663–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 495–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–75). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, B. C., & Harold, C. M. (2013). Effects of leadership consideration and structure on employee perceptions of justice and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(4), 492–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T. (2012). (Un)ethical leadership and identity: What did we learn and where do we go from here? Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2013). Someone to look up to: Executive-follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management, 39(3), 660–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., Piccolo, R. F., & Ilies, R. (2004). The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalshoven, K., den Hartog, D. N., & de Hoogh, A. H. B. (2011). Ethical leadership at work questionnaire (ELW): Development and validation of a multidimensional measure. Leadership Quarterly, 22(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman, B. L. (2004). Bad leadership: What it is, how it happens, why it matters. Boston: Harvad Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialisation theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1993). The credibility factor: what people expect of leaders. Westview Print: Contemporary issues in leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, K. (2013). What is leadership? Forbes Magazine. http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2013/04/09/what-is-leadership/2/.

  • Leroy, H., Palanski, M. E., & Simons, T. (2012). Authentic leadership and behavioral integrity as drivers of follower commitment and performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K. G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006a). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society—A relational perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Pless, N. M. (2006b). Responsible leadership. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., Pless, N. M., & Voegtlin, C. (2016). Business statesman or shareholder advocate? CEO responsible leadership styles and the micro-foundations of political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 463–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations-oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader-member exchange quality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1968). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. M., Aquino, K., Greenbaum, R. L., & Kuenzi, M. (2012). Who displays ethical leadership, and does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical Leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1994). Can personality change? Levels of stability and growth in personality across the life span. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. J. (1990). Personality in adulthood. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michie, S., & Gooty, J. (2005). Values, emotions, and authenticity: Will the real leader please stand up? The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 441–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oceja, L., & Jimenez, I. (2007). Beyond egoism and group identity: Empathy toward the other and awareness of others in a social dilemma. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and leadership: Clearing the conceptual confusion. European Management Journal, 25(3), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piccolo, R. F., Greenbaum, R., Den Hartog, D. N., & Folger, R. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2011). Reponsible leadeship: Pathways to the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. L. (2003). The ethics of authentic transformational leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(1), 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53(4), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1959). A theory of therapy, personality and onterpersonal relationships, as developed in a clint-centered framework. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3). Toronto: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1963). The actualizing tendency in relation to “motives” and to consciousness. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 1–24). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What’s your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charistmatic leadership—A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4(4), 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simola, S., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2012). Transformational leadership and leaders’ mode of care reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skubinn, R., & Herzog, L. (2016). Internalized moral identity in ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(2), 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stover, C. M. (2010). Use of a confluent education strategy to develop empathy in nursing students. Journal of Nursing Education, 49(12), 719–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., & Brown, M. E. (2004). Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K., & Brown, M.E. (2007). Ethical leadership. In D. Nelson & C.L. Cooper (Eds.), Positive organizational behavior. Accentuating the positive at work. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K., Brown, M., & Hartman, L. P. (2003). A qualitative investigation of perceived executive ethical leadership: Perceptions from inside and outside the executive suite. Human Relations, 56(1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. A., Siegel, D. S., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, L.-Z., Kwan, H. K., Yim, F. H.-K., Chiu, R. K., & He, X. (2015). CEO ethical leadership and corporate social responsibility: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 819–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A., & Quick, J. C. (2011). The role of character in ethical leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 975–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F. J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership and multiple levels of analysis. Human Relations, 43(10), 975–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Buengeler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skubinn, R., Buengeler, C., Schank, C. (2019). Ethics in Leadership: Carving Out the Ethical Core in Current Leadership Theories. In: Sales, A. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Change. Ethical Economy, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15407-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics