Abstract
This chapter examines the lesser vilified issue of “unethical authorship deals”. Unethical authorship should be afforded the same status as other forms of research misconduct such as plagiarism, as it is a form of deception and it often involves the exploitation of lesser acclaimed authors. Unethical authorship deals occur when authors collude to misrepresent the true authorship of a paper and this form of misrepresentation makes it difficult to assess the credibility and validity of a work against possible bias. The true authorship of a paper may be misrepresented in several ways. Authors may bestow authorship upon an individual who has not substantially contributed to the work or an author may take full credit for a paper that was co-written by a ghost author. While honorary authorships or ghost authorships are clear infractions, the authorship order issue is an underrated contravention. The aim of this chapter will be to draw attention to the concept of ethical authorship deals and explore the prevalence of unethical authorship practice. While there is a dearth of studies with respect to unethical authorship in Africa, these limited studies indicate that the problem is of significance within the African continent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Albert, T., & Wager, E. (2003). How to handle authorship disputes: A guide for new researchers. Retrieved from https://publicationethics.org/files/2003pdf12_0.pdf
ASA. (1999). Code of Ethics of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Retrieved from http://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/code_of_ethics_aug_2017_2_1.pdf
Breet, E., Botha, J., Horn, L., & Swartz, L. (2018). Academic and scientific authorship practices: A survey among South African researchers. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 412–420.
COPE Discussion Document. (2015). What constitutes authorship? COPE discussion document. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/news/what-constitutes-authorship-new-cope-discussion-document
Department of Higher Education and Training. (2015). Research outputs policy. Government Gazette, 597, 1–32.
Gasparyan, A. Y., Ayvazyan, L., & Kitas, G. D. (2013). Authorship problems in scholarly journals: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatology International, 33(2), 277–284.
ICMJE. (2009). Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: Writing and editing for biomedical publication. Retrieved from http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf
Kwok, L. S. (2005). The white bull effect: Abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(9), 554–556.
Lategan, L. O. (2012). The building of a responsible research community: The role of ethics. Journal of Research Administration, 43(1), 85–97.
Louw, D., & Fouche, J. (1999). Authorship credit in supervisor-student collaboration: Assessing the dilemma in psychology. South Africa Journal of Psychology, 29(3), 145–148.
Macfarlane, B. (2017). The ethics of multiple authorship: Power, performativity and the gift economy. Studies in Higher Education, 42(7), 1194–1210.
Marušić, A., & Marušić, M. (2013). 3.6: Scientific authorship. In Science editors’ handbook (2nd ed.). European Association of Editors. Retrieved from www.ease.org.uk
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.
Mouton, J., & Valentine, A. (2017). The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals. South African Journal of Science, 113(7–8), 1–9.
Okonta, P., & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics, 13(3), 149–157.
Osborne, J. W., & Holland, A. (2009). What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(15), 1–19.
Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: Ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80.
Santos, I., Duarte, C., Maher, D., Macreadie, P., & Johnston, S. G. (2015, February 2). Tackling unethical authorship deals on scientific publications. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://phys.org/news/2015-02-tackling-unethical-authorship-scientific.html#jCp
Singh, M. K. (2017). Authorship and collaboration pattern in biotechnology research: A study of IBSA countries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-Journal), 1607. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1607
Smith, E., Hunt, M., & Master, Z. (2014). Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), 42.
Strange, K. (2008). Authorship: Why not just toss a coin? American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, 295(3), C567–C575.
Vučković-Dekić, L. (2003). Authorship-coauthorship. Archive of Oncology, 11(3), 211–212.
Wislar, J. S., Flanagin, A., Fontanarosa, P. B., & DeAngelis, C. D. (2011). Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ, 343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6128.
Suggested Further Readings
Endersby, J. W. (1996). Collaborative research in the social sciences: Multiple authorship and publication credit. Social Science Quarterly, 77(2), 375–392.
Henriksen, D. (2016). The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics, 107(2), 455–476.
Ren, X., Su, H., Lu, K., Dong, X., Ouyang, Z., & Talhelm, T. (2016). Culture and unmerited authorship credit: Who wants it and why? Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02017.
Resnik, D. B., & Shamoo, A. E. (2011). The Singapore statement on research integrity. Accountability in Research, 18(2), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2011.557296.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Padayachee, K. (2019). Unethical Authorship Deals: Concepts, Challenges and Guidelines. In: Nortjé, N., Visagie, R., Wessels, J. (eds) Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Research Ethics Forum, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15402-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15402-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15401-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15402-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)