Skip to main content

Social Responsibility and Health-Related Social Sciences Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Science Research Ethics in Africa

Part of the book series: Research Ethics Forum ((REFF,volume 7))

Abstract

Africa continues to be burdened by widespread poverty and endemic diseases, with huge inequity in accessing healthcare services. Health research in all its forms is essential to address the numerous health systems challenges in Africa, using complementary biomedical and social sciences approaches. There is, however, a risk of exploitation from the traditionally hierarchical, Western world-centred and -funded approach to health research in Africa. Care must therefore be taken to ensure health research, including health-related social sciences research, is ethically sound, responsive to local need and respectful of local cultures and values.

This chapter provides a background, history and context to socially responsible and responsive health-related research in the African context. It presents the fundamental ethical principles (beneficence/non-maleficence, respect for persons and justice) for health-related research, and describes how these interface with social responsibility and responsiveness. The roles of Research Ethics Committees in promoting socially responsible and ethically sound health-related research is discussed; and a framework for conducting socially responsible and responsive health-related research in Africa is proposed, applying the principles of “Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)”. RRI encompasses a research approach which explicitly considers the potential impacts of the research on society in a responsible and responsive way.

In order to properly address and mitigate the fundamental health concerns throughout Africa, it is essential that a socially responsible and responsive research approach be adopted, considering accepted ethical principles. By including the community as stakeholders, using a participatory RRI model, the specific needs of diverse communities across the continent can be identified and addressed, in a culture of respect, tolerance and mutual responsibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. M., & Palermo, A. G. (2010). Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100(8), 1380–1387. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.178137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, C. A., & Abeles, R. P. (2004). Social science and health research: Growth at the National Institutes of Health. American Journal of Public Health, 94(1), 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, S. R. (2002). Reflections and recommendations on research ethics in developing countries. Social Science & Medicine, 54(7), 1131–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, S. J. (2014). Socially responsible science is more than “good science”. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 15(2), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v15i2.870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. E., & Canning, D. (2008). Population health and economic growth. Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.documents.worldbank.org

  • Bracken-Roche, D., Bell, E., Macdonald, M. E., & Racine, E. (2017). The concept of ‘vulnerability’ in research ethics: An in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0164-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, K. M., Jayaraman, S., Kyamanywa, P., & Ntakiyiruta, G. (2014). Building research capacity in Africa: Equity and global health collaborations. PLoS Medicine, 11(3), e1001612. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Macroeconomics and Health. (2001). Macroeconomics and health: Investing in health for economic development. Canada. Retrieved from apps who.int/iris/handle/10665/42463

  • CSDH. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Geneva. Retrieved from www.who.int

  • Egharevba, E., & Atkinson, J. (2016). The role of corruption and unethical behaviours in precluding the placement of industry sponsored clinical trials in sub-Saharan Africa: Stakeholder views. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications, 3, 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., Killen, J., & Grady, C. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189(5), 930–937. https://doi.org/10.1086/381709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Ethical and regulatory challenges to science and research policy at the global level. Retrieved from https://protect-za.mimecast.com/s/LqbWB4IAMW4xF7

  • Gbadegesin, S., & Wendler, D. (2006). Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics, 20(5), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00501.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geoghegan-Quinn, M. (2012). Message delivered at the conference “Science in dialogue – Towards a European model for responsible research and innovation”. Odense, Denmark, 23–25 April 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Burden of Disease Collaborators. Causes of Death. (2017). Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet, 390(10100), 1151–1210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurzawska, A., & Bencin, R. (2015). Ethical assessment in different fields: Social sciences. Slovenia. Retrieved from www.satoriproject.eu

  • Holzer, J. K., Ellis, L., & Merritt, M. W. (2014 Aug). Why we need community engagement in medical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 62(6), 851–855. https://doi.org/10.1097/JIM.0000000000000097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikingura, J., & Kithinji, C. (2014). The REC standard operating procedures in Africa. In M. Ndebele, P. Kruger, & L. Horn (Eds.), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (pp. 29–32). Stellenbosch: SUN MeDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasule, M., Wassenaar, D. R., Jsselmuiden, C. I., & Mokgatla, B. (2016). Silent voices: Current and future roles of African research ethics committee administrators. IRB, 38(1), 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, K. N., & Steinwachs, D. M. (2002). Health services research: An evolving definition of the field. Health Services Research, 37(1), 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, T. (2007). Toward an African Moral Theory. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 15(3), 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mkhize, N. (2008). Communal personhood and the principle of autonomy: The ethical challenges. Continuing Medical Education, 24(1), 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, C., Goudge, J., Russell, S., Chuma, J., Gumede, T., & Gilson, L. (2009). Conducting health-related social science research in low income settings: Ethical dilemmas faced in Kenya and South Africa. Journal of International Development, 21(2), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ndebele, P., Mwaluko, G., Kruger, M., Ouwe, O., Oukem-Boyer, M., & Zimba, M. (2014). History of research ethics review in Africa. In M. Kruger, P. Ndebele, & L. Horn (Eds.), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (1st ed., pp. 3–10). Stellenbosch: SUN MeDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. M., Beauchamp, T., Miller, V.A., Reynolds, W., Ittenbach, R. F., & Luce, M. F. (2011). The concept of voluntary consent. The American Journal of Bioethics, 11(8), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.583318, https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.583318.

  • Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2007). Responsibility for health: Personal, social, and environmental. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(8), 444–445. doi: 33/8/444 [pii].

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2016). The ethical challenges of socially responsible science. Accountability in Research, 23(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.1002608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RRI Tools Consortium. A practical guide to responsible research and innovation: Key lessons from RRI tools. Retrieved from https://www.rri-tools.eu/

  • Stone, V. (2016). Innov8 approach for reviewing national health programmes to leave no one behind: Technical handbook. Geneva, Switzerland. Retrieved from: www.who.int/life-course/publications/innov8-technical-handbook/en/

  • Theobald, S., & Simwaka, B. N. (2008). The research, policy and practice interface: Reflections on using applied social research to promote equity in health in Malawi. Social Science and Medicine, 63, 760–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tindana, P., Bull, S., Amenga-Etego, L., De Vries, J., Aborigo, R., Koram, K., & Parker, M. (2012). Seeking consent to genetic and genomic research in a rural Ghanaian setting: A qualitative study of the MalariaGEN experience. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, 15. 6939-6913-6915. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-13-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tluway, F., & Makani, J. (2017). Sickle cell disease in Africa: An overview of the integrated approach to health, research, education and advocacy in Tanzania, 2004–2016. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.14594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasunna, C., Tegli, J., & Ndebele, P. (2014). Informed consent in an African context. In M. Ndebele, P. Kruger, & L. Horn (Eds.), Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (1st ed.). Stellenbosch: SUN MeDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weijer, C., & Emanuel, E. J. (2000). Ethics – Protecting communities in biomedical research. Science, 289(5482), 1142–1144. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5482.1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wemos Health Unlimited. (2017). Clinical trials in Africa: The cases of Egypt, Kenya, Zimbabwe and South Africa. The Netherlands. Retrieved from https://protect-za.mimecast.com/s/9xNDBlfWxA8lclE

  • World Conference on Social Determinants of Health. (2011). Rio political declaration on social determinants of health. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Retrieved from www.who.int/sdhconference/declaration/Rio_politicial_declaration.pdf

  • World Health Organisation. (2013). Health promotion: Strategy for the African Region. Brazzaville. Retrieved from www.afro.who.int/sites/

Suggested Further Readings

  • Chu, K. M., Jayaraman, S., Kyamanywa, P., & Ntakiyiruta, G. (2014). Building research capacity in Africa: Equity and global health collaborations. Plos Medicine, 11(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, M., Ndebele, P., & Horn, L. (Eds.). (2014). Research ethics in Africa: A resource for research ethics committees (1st ed.). Stellenbosch: SUN MeDIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B., & Elliott, K. C. (2016). The ethical challenges of socially responsible science. Accountability in research, 23(1), 31–46

    Google Scholar 

  • RRI Tools Consortium. (n.d.). A practical guide to responsible research and innovation: Key lessons from RRI tools. Available from https://www.rri-tools.eu/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brenda M. Morrow .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Morrow, B.M., Worku, E.B., Mathibe-Neke, J.M. (2019). Social Responsibility and Health-Related Social Sciences Research. In: Nortjé, N., Visagie, R., Wessels, J. (eds) Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Research Ethics Forum, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15402-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics