Advertisement

Agricultural Commodities on the Philippine Frontier: State-Sponsored Resettlement and Ecological Distress in the 1930s

Chapter
  • 305 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Economic History book series (PEHS)

Abstract

In 1938, a delegation of Filipino government officials traveled to Mindanao, a majority “non-Christian” province in the southern Philippines, to determine whether the Koronadal Valley would be a good site for resettlement. They believed that agricultural commodity production on the archipelago’s periphery would provide a foundation for a sovereign Philippine economy and wanted to move Christian migrants from northern islands onto an enormous “agricultural colony.” To make their case, they cast the area as extremely lush, drawing on the idea that peripheral space in the tropics had limitless potential. New forms of intensive agricultural production did not pull migrants out of poverty, but it did radically transform the landscape, undercutting the power of indigenous locals and producing an agroecological terrain in persistent environmental crisis.

Bibliography

Manuscript Collections

  1. General Paulino Santos Museum, Notre Dame of Dadiangas University, General Santos City, Philippines.Google Scholar
  2. Joseph Ralston Hayden Papers, Bentley Library, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  3. U.S. Department of Agriculture Records, The National Archives at College Park.Google Scholar

Newspapers

  1. Manila Daily Herald.Google Scholar
  2. Philippine Magazine.Google Scholar
  3. The Sunday Tribune Magazine.Google Scholar

Printed Primary and Secondary Sources

  1. Bañas-Nograles, Hon. Shirlyn L. SPPR NO. 2017. “Resolution Conferring Posthumous Recognition and Honor to Don Francisco Natividad for His Cultural and Historical Contributions toward the Growth and Development of General Santos City.”Google Scholar
  2. Greene, Julie. “Movable Empire: Labor, Migration, and U.S. Global Power During the Gilded Age and Progressive Era.” The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era 15 (2016): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Luyt, Brendan. “Narratives, Shifting Cultivation, and Knowledge Projects in the Philippines, 1901–1941: A Cautionary Tale.” Library & Information History 33, no. 1 (2017): 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lynch, Owen, Jr. “The Philippine Indigenous Law Collection: An Introduction and Preliminary Bibliography.” Philippine Law Journal 58 (1983): 457–534.Google Scholar
  5. Pelzer, Karl J. Pioneer Settlement in the Asiatic Tropics. New York: American Geographical Society, 1945.Google Scholar
  6. Quirino, Carlos. “America’s Colonial Blunders.” Commonwealth Advocate 1, no. 8 (August 1935): 13–16.Google Scholar
  7. U.S. Congress, “The Philippine Independence Act,” Approved, March 24, 1934.Google Scholar
  8. Umehara, Hiromitsu. “Agricultural Colonization and Environmental Change in Koronadal Valley, South Cotabato.” In Communities at the Margins: Reflections on Social, Economic, and Environmental Change in the Philippines, edited by Hiromitsu Umehara and Germelino M. Bautista, 57–83. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Ventura, Theresa. “American Empire, Agrarian Reform and the Problem of Tropical Nature in the Philippines, 1898–1916.” PhD diss., Columbia University, 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Villano-Campado, Andrea. “The Tuna Country at the Southern Edge of Mindanao: General Santos City, 1939–2000.” Accessed January 4, 2012. http://www.notredamegensan.org/gscbk.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LaGuardia Community CollegeCity University of New YorkNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations