Advertisement

Robotic Abdominoperineal Resection: Cylindrical and Selective Cylindrical Approach

  • Slawomir MarecikEmail author
  • Ahmed Al-Khamis
  • Kunal Kochar
  • John J. Park
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will review the specific advantages that robotic technology has to offer when performing abdominoperineal resection (APR), which historically has been considered a challenging operation. Several operative techniques will be discussed, including (1) robotic rectal mobilization with conventional perineal dissection, (2) the use of transabdominal levator and extralevator transection to simplify the perineal dissection, and (3) selective eccentric extralevator transection for eccentrically located tumors.

Keywords

Robotic abdominoperineal resection Cylindrical approach Selective cylindrical approach APR 

Supplementary material

Video 13.1

Robotic abdominoperineal resection (MOV 610032 kb)

Video 13.2

ELAPE technique (MOV 188669 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Heald RJ. The ‘holy plane’ of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81(9):503–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Marr R, et al. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    den Dulk M, et al. The abdominoperineal resection itself is associated with an adverse outcome: the European experience based on a pooled analysis of five European randomised clinical trials on rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(7):1175–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park EJ, et al. Short-term outcomes of the modified extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (with videos). Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1672–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holm T, et al. Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94(2):232–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bebenek M. Abdominosacral amputation of the rectum for low rectal cancers: ten years of experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(8):2211–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(2):303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marecik SJ, et al. Robotic cylindrical abdominoperineal resection with transabdominal levator transection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(10):1320–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sieffert M, et al. Novel technique of robotic extralevator abdominoperineal resection with gracilis flap closure. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3):e1764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bae SU, et al. Robotic interface for transabdominal division of the levators and pelvic floor reconstruction in abdominoperineal resection: a case report and technical description. Int J Med Robot. 2015;11(3):296–301.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1624. Epub 2014 Nov 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    West NP, et al. Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(4):588–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han JG, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical study of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(12):1333–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    So JB, et al. Postoperative perineal hernia. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40(8):954–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Welsch T, et al. Results of extralevator abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer including quality of life and long-term wound complications. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28(4):503–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pai A, et al. Robotic site adjusted levator transection for carcinoma of the rectum: a modification of the existing cylindrical abdominoperineal resection for eccentrically located tumors. World J Surg. 2017;41(2):590–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silva-Velazco J, et al. Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes based on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg. 2017;265(5):960–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mak TW, et al. Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a systematic review of current practice. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014;6(6):184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jayne DG, et al. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber PA, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(12):1689–94; discussion 1695–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim JC, et al. A comparison of the technical and oncologic validity between robot-assisted and conventional open abdominoperineal resection. Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(8):961–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pigazzi A, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2006;20(10):1521–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    deSouza AL, et al. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1611–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lim DR, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(4):1728–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saklani AP, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of oncologic outcomes. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28(12):1689–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Memon S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2095–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jayne D, et al. Effect of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery on risk of conversion to open laparotomy among patients undergoing resection for rectal Cancer: the ROLARR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1569–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shihab OC, et al. A pictorial description of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2012;14(10):e655–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    West NP, et al. Evidence of the oncologic superiority of cylindrical abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3517–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    de Campos-Lobato LF, et al. Prone or lithotomy positioning during an abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer results in comparable oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(8):939–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tayyab M, et al. Evaluation of the impact of implementing the prone jackknife position for the perineal phase of abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(3):316–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marecik SJ, et al. Transanal total mesorectal excision: save the nerves and urethra. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):e410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marecik SJ, et al. Rectal anatomy: clinical perspective. In: Chang GJ, editor. Rectal cancer, modern approaches to treatment. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 1–23, Print.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chang G. MD., Houston; personal correspondence.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kochar K, et al. Omental pedicle flap does not decrease the incidence of bowel obstruction after abdominoperineal resection. Am Surg. 2016;82(11):328–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ortiz H, et al. Multicentre propensity score-matched analysis of conventional versus extended abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2014;101(7):874–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eftaiha SM, et al. Robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: clinical, pathologic, and oncologic outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(7):607–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Velchuru VR, et al. Obesity increases the risk of postoperative peripheral neuropathy after minimally invasive colon and rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(2):187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rice ML, Hay AM, Hurlow RH. Omentoplasty in abdominoperineal resection of the rectum. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992;62(2):147–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Martijnse IS, et al. Focus on extralevator perineal dissection in supine position for low rectal cancer has led to better quality of surgery and oncologic outcome. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):786–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Stelzner S, et al. Long-term outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for low rectal cancer. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(10):1729–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Slawomir Marecik
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ahmed Al-Khamis
    • 1
  • Kunal Kochar
    • 1
  • John J. Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Colon and Rectal SurgeryAdvocate Lutheran General HospitalPark RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Colorectal SurgeryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations