Robotic Proctectomy and Ileoanal Pouch Creation

  • Amy L. LightnerEmail author
  • David W. Larson


Restoration of intestinal continuity following total proctocolectomy is performed by constructing an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). Since the advent of this technique in 1978, the operation has evolved from hand-sewn to stapled anastomoses, a two-stage to three-stage approach in the setting of immunosuppression, and from an open technique to a minimally invasive approach. While laparoscopy has become widely used for IPAA construction, a robotic approach may offer several advantages and may become more widely used in the future years. The bony confines of a narrow pelvis make the angles of laparoscopy challenging, and the robot provides improved three-dimensional and high-definition visualization of the pelvis. Once the pelvic floor has been exposed, the better visualization and multiple degrees of freedom help to improve deployment of intracorporeal stapling devices. We will herein discuss our approach to a robotic IPAA and highlight steps that may require intraoperative troubleshooting.


Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis Minimally invasive surgery Inflammatory bowel disease 


  1. 1.
    Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J. 1978;2(6130):85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM, et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomoses complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg. 1995;222(2):120–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Larson DW, Cima RR, Dozois EJ, et al. Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis: a single institutional case-matched experience. Ann Surg. 2006;243(5):667–70; discussion 670–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White I, Jenkins JT, Coomber R, Clark SK, Phillips RK, Kennedy RH. Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy. Br J Surg. 2014;101(9):1160–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed Ali U, Keus F, Heikens JT, et al. Open versus laparoscopic (assisted) ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1).
  6. 6.
    Bartels SA, D'Hoore A, Cuesta MA, Bensdorp AJ, Lucas C, Bemelman WA. Significantly increased pregnancy rates after laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a cross-sectional study. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):1045–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beyer-Berjot L, Maggiori L, Birnbaum D, Lefevre JH, Berdah S, Panis Y. A total laparoscopic approach reduces the infertility rate after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a 2-center study. Ann Surg. 2013;258(2):275–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang Y, Wang F, Zhang P, et al. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(12):3727–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Juo YY, Hyder O, Haider AH, Camp M, Lidor A, Ahuja N. Is minimally invasive colon resection better than traditional approaches?: first comprehensive national examination with propensity score matching. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(2):177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trinh BB, Jackson NR, Hauch AT, Hu T, Kandil E. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS. 2014;18(4):e2014.00187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(4):458–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(10):1701–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bertani E, Chiappa A, Biffi R, et al. Assessing appropriateness for elective colorectal cancer surgery: clinical, oncological, and quality-of-life short-term outcomes employing different treatment approaches. Int J Color Dis. 2011;26(10):1317–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khasawneh MA, McKenna NP, Abdelsattar ZM, et al. Impact of BMI on ability to successfully create an IPAA. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(11):1034–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Burnstein MJ, Schoetz DJ Jr, Coller JA, Veidenheimer MC. Technique of mesenteric lengthening in ileal reservoir-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30(11):863–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Araki T, Parc Y, Lefevre J, Dehni N, Tiret E, Parc R. The effect on morbidity of mesentery lengthening techniques and the use of a covering stoma after ileoanal pouch surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):621–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Martel P, Majery N, Savigny B, Sezeur A, Gallot D, Malafosse M. Mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: is high division of the superior mesenteric pedicle a safe procedure? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(7):862–6; discussion 866–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thirlby RC. Optimizing results and techniques of mesenteric lengthening in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):499–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Colon and Rectal SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations