Conclusion: Managerializing the Status Quo as Security Blanket
In this final chapter, an important observation is made that English-speaking Western TESOL, its outworkings and underlying ideologies are a formidable nemesis to any transformative effort that might be gallantly undertaken to make English teaching more humanizing and equitable. Superimposed on a Japanese ethos, English-speaking Western TESOL operates hand-in-hand with nihonjinron to preserve a status quo that invariably upholds Japanese nationalistic culturalist ideologies. Japan, for all its hawkishness and resistance against matters foreign seems to have few qualms about welcoming English-speaking Western TESOL to its culturally well-fortified shores. With its native speakerist beliefs in tow, it serves as a subtle yet sardonic way of reinforcing Japaneseness, furnishing and humoring conservative Japan with the semblance of internationalization it covets while parading a tokenized form of diversity.
- Apple, M., & Christian-Smith, L. (1991). The politics of the textbook. In M. Apple & L. Christian-Smith (Eds.), The politics of the textbook (pp. 1–21). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Canagarajah, A. S. (2007). After disinvention: Possibilities for communication, community and competence. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 233–239). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Gray, J., & Block, D. (2012). The marketization of language teacher education and neoliberalism. In D. Block, J. Gray, & M. Holborow (Eds.), Neoliberalism and applied linguistics (pp. 114–143). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Houghton, S. A., & Rivers, D. J. (Eds.). (2013). Native-speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Ishikawa, M. (2011). Redefining internationalization in higher education: Global 30 and the making of global universities in Japan. In D. B. Willis & J. Rappleye (Eds.), Reimagining Japanese education: Borders, transfers, circulations, and the comparative (pp. 193–224). Oxford: Symposium.Google Scholar
- Jannuzi, C. (1999, June 30). Response to Masaki Oda’s chapter in Braine’s new book (Electronic mailing list message). Retrieved from https://linguistlist.org/issues/10/10-1015.html.
- Kramsch, C. (2002). How can we tell the dancer from the dance? In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization (pp. 1–30). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006a). Dangerous liaison: Globalization, empire and TESOL. In J. Edge (Ed.), (Re-)locating TESOL in an age of empire (pp. 1–26). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006b). Understanding language teaching: From method to postmethod. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Levine, G. (2011). Code choice in the language classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- May, S. (2014). Introducing the “multilingual turn”. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- McVeigh, B. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
- McVeigh, B. (2006). The state bearing gifts: Deception and disaffection in Japanese higher education. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Oda, M. (1999). English only or English plus? The language(s) of EFL organizations. In G. Braine (Ed.), Nonnative educators in English language teaching (pp. 105–121). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Oda, M., & Toh, G. (2018). Significant encounters and consequential eventualities: A joint narrative of collegiality marked by struggles against reductionism, essentialism and exclusion in ELT. In B. Yazan & N. Rudolph (Eds.), Criticality, teacher identity, and (in)equity in English language teaching: Issues and implications (pp. 219–236). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
- Olssen, M., Codd, J., & O’Neill, A. (2004). Education policy: Globalization, citizen and democracy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Peters, M. (2012, June 6). Freedom, openness and creativity in the digital economy. Truthout, Wednesday. Retrieved from http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/9547-freedom-openness-and-creativity-in-the-digital-economy on 4 November 2016.
- Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Taniguchi, S. (2010). Transforming identities in and through narratives. In D. Nunan & J. Choi (Eds.), Language and culture: Reflective narratives and the emergence of identity (pp. 208–214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Toh, G. (2016a). English as medium of instruction in Japanese higher education: Presumption, mirage or bluff? London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Toh, G. (2016c). Doing justice to an English as a lingua franca paradigm. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 5(2), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2016-0024.