Abstract
Guided by critical educator Paulo Freire’s vision for conscionably humane forms of education, this chapter examines the nature of power asymmetries, oppressions, fragmentations and imprisoning discourses operational within educational domains, in particular, English teaching. Discourses of neutrality, accountability and utilitarianism are problematized, discourses which undermine otherwise more humanizing ideals, while educators are seen variously to be professionally and subjectively collusive or complicit with regimes of oppression where hegemonies and mythologies are routinely nourished around ‘enlightened’ research or pedagogical practices which are empowering (alas only) in appearance, but decidedly oppressive in reality. The case of certain aspects of second language acquisition (SLA) research is highlighted as an example of presumption and oppressiveness in the way the learner is interpolated and invoked as a subject-object of scrutiny.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alderson, J. C. (2009). Setting the scene. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp. 8–44). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: An example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587931.
Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Burgess, C. (2010, March 23). Higher education: Opening up or closing in? Contradictory reform goals could scotch chances of success. The Japan Times [Electronic Version]. Retrieved 2 December 2017, from http://japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/20100323zg.html.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2007). Lingua franca English, multilingual communities, and language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 923–939. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00678.x.
Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fairclough, I., & Fairclough, N. (2012). Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. London: Routledge.
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.). New York: Bloomsbury.
Garcia, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Garcia, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism, and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gass, S. (1998). Apples and oranges: Or, why apples are not orange and don’t need to be: A response to Firth and Wagner. Modern Language Journal, 82(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb02597.x.
Gass, S. M., Lee, J., & Roots, R. (2007). Firth and Wagner (1997): New ideas or a new articulation? The Modern Language Journal, 91(Focus Issue), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00669.x.
Hall, J. K. (1997). A consideration of SLA as a theory of practice: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05482.x.
Hanson, J. (2013). Moving out of the monolingual comfort zone and into the multilingual world: An exercise of the writing classroom. In A. S. Canagarajah (Ed.), Literacy as translingual practice: Between communities and classrooms (pp. 207–214). New York: Routledge.
Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ishikawa, M. (2011). Redefining internationalization in higher education: Global 30 and the making of global universities in Japan. In D. B. Willis & J. Rappleye (Eds.), Reimagining Japanese education: Borders, transfers, circulations, and the comparative (pp. 193–224). Oxford: Symposium.
Kasper, G. (1997). “A” stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 307–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05483.x.
Kerr, R. (2009). The politics of ELT projects in China. In J. C. Alderson (Ed.), The politics of language education: Individuals and institutions (pp. 85–103). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Kohn, K. (2018). MY English: A social constructivist perspective on ELF. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/jelf-2018-0001.
Kramsch, C. (2014). Teaching foreign languages in an era of globalization: Introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 296–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12057.x.
Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English, neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.02.002.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.
Long, M. H. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 318–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05487.x.
McLaren, P. (2015). Reflections on Paulo Freire, critical pedagogy, and the current crisis of capitalism. In M. A. Peters & T. Besley (Eds.), Paulo Freire: The global legacy (pp. 17–38). New York: Peter Lang.
Oda, M., & Toh, G. (2018). Significant encounters and consequential eventualities: A joint narrative of collegiality marked by struggles against reductionism, essentialism and exclusion in ELT. In B. Yazan & N. Rudolph (Eds.), Criticality, teacher identity, and (in)equity in English language teaching: Issues and implications (pp. 219–236). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Ortega, L. (2014). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May (Ed.), The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32–53). New York: Routledge.
Otheguy, R., Garcia, G., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014.
Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.
Pennycook, A. (2007). The myth of English as an international language. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 90–115). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
Rivers, D. J. (2013). Institutionalized native-speakerism: Voices of dissent and acts of resistance. In D. J. Rivers & S. A. Houghton (Eds.), Native speakerism in Japan: Intergroup dynamics in foreign language education (pp. 75–91). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Rivers, D. J. (2015). The authorities of autonomy and English only: Serving whose interests? In D. J. Rivers (Ed.), Resistance to the known: Counter-conduct in language education (pp. 94–120). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stewart, A., & Miyahara, M. (2011). Parallel universes: Globalization and identity in English language teaching at a Japanese university. In P. Seargeant (Ed.), English in Japan in the era of globalization (pp. 60–79). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Toh, G. (2003a). A case for having a more critical orientation to ELT in Southeast Asia. World Englishes, 22(4), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2003.00318.x.
Toh, G. (2003b). Response 2. World Englishes, 22(4), 548–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2003.00323.x.
Toh, G. (2013). Locality, re-localization, structure-to-structure localism and the TOEIC test: Implications for English language education at tertiary level in Japan. In R. S. Webster & S. A. Stolz (Eds.), Measuring up in education (pp. 226–251). Melbourne: Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia.
Toh, G. (2015). Dialogizing ‘the known’: Experience of English teaching in Japan through an assay of derivatives as a dominant motif. In D. J. Rivers (Ed.), Resistance to the known: Counter-conduct in language education (pp. 144–167). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Toh, G. (2016a). English as medium of instruction in Japanese higher education: Presumption, mirage or bluff? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Widdowson, H. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587438.
Widin, J. (2010). Illegitimate practices: Global English language education. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Zuengler, J., & Miller, E. (2006). Cognitive and sociocultural perspectives: Two parallel SLA worlds. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264510.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toh, G. (2019). Oppression, Obscuration and Ideology. In: Effecting Change in English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15261-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15261-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15260-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15261-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)