Skip to main content

The Capacity to Make Medical Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychiatric Ethics in Late-Life Patients

Abstract

This chapter examines the core components of a capacity evaluation, the consequences of determining a patient lacks capacity, and issues commonly arising in clinical practice, specifically focusing on elderly individuals and those with dementia. There are four central components that patients must possess to be considered capacitated: (1) a basic understanding of the relevant medical background and circumstances; (2) an appreciation of the risks, benefits, and consequences of possible choices; (3) the ability to communicate a choice; and (4) communicating the rationale for arriving at that decision (Appelbaum and Grisso, NEJM. 319:1635–38, 1988). How these components are assessed and analyzed in the context of a clinical interview is examined in greater detail throughout the chapter. Understanding ways to appropriately assess capacity is particularly important for providers caring for patients with dementia, as this may be a frequent clinical concern. Evidence-based tools for assessing cognition and capacity and their role in a thorough capacity evaluation are also reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Appelbaum P, Grisso T. Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. NEJM. 1988;319(25):1635–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Appelbaum P. Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. NEJM. 2007;357(18):1834–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrell TW, Widera E, Rosenberg L, Rubin CD, Naik AD, Braun U, et al. AGS position statement: making medical treatment decisions for unbefriended older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;65(1):14–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sessums LL, Zembrzuska H, Jackson JL. Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA. 2011;306(4):420.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boyle R. Determining patients’ capacity to share in decision-making. In: Fletcher JC, Spencer EM, Lombardo PA, editors. Fletcher’s introduction to clinical ethics. 3rd ed. Hagerstown: University Publishing Group; 2005. p. 117–38.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hurst SA. When patients refuse assessment of decision-making capacity. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(16):1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Young G, Douglass A, Davison L. What do doctors know about assessing decision-making capacity? N Z Med J. 2018;131(1471):58–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganzini L, Volicer L, Nelson W, Derse A. Pitfalls in assessment of decision-making capacity. Psychosomatics. 2003;44(3):237–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Trachsel M, Hermann H, Biller-Andorno N. Cognitive fluctuations as a challenge for the assessment of decision-making capacity in patients with dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2015;30(4):360–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boettger S, Bergman M, Jenewin J, Boettger S. Advanced age and decisional capacity: the effect of age on the ability to make health care decisions. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;66:211–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ganzini L, Volicer L, Nelson W, Fox E, Derse AR. Ten myths about decision-making capacity. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004;5(3 Suppl):263–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodin M, Mohile S. Assessing decisional capacity in the elderly. Semin Oncol. 2008;35(6):625–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edersheim J, Murray E, Padmanabhan J, Price BH. Protecting the health and finances of the elderly with early cognitive impairment. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2017;45(1):81–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Falk E, Hoffman N. The role of capacity assessments in elder abuse investigations and guardianship. Clin Geriatr Med. 2014;30(4):851–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fetherstonhaugh D, McAuliffe L, Bauer M, Shanley C. Decision-making on behalf of people living with dementia: how do surrogate decision-makers decide? J Med Ethics. 2017;43(1):35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fetherstonhaugh D, McAuliffe L, Shanley C, Bauer M, Beattie E. “Did I make the right decision?”: the difficult journey of being a surrogate decision maker for a person living with dementia. Dementia (London). 2017;0:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lin JS, O’Connor E, Rossom R, Perdue LA, Burda BU, Thompson M, et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in older adults: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Evid Synth. 2013;107:1–403.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moye J, Karel M, Gurrera R, Azar AR. Neuropsychological predictors of decision-making capacity over 9 months in mild-to-moderate dementia. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1):78–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Grisso T, Appelbaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C. The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(11):1415–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Porrino P, Falcone Y, Agosta L, Isaia G, Zanocchi M, Mastrapasqua A, et al. Informed consent in older medical inpatients: assessment of decision-making capacity. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(11):2423–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lai JM, Gill TM, Cooney LM, Bradley EH, Hawkins KA, Karlawish JH. Everyday decision-making ability in older persons with cognitive impairment. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(8):693–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Baird AD, Solcz SL, Gale-Ross R, Blake TM. Older adults and capacity-related assessment: promise and caution. Exp Aging Res. 2009;35(3):297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Etchells E, Darzins P, Silberfeld M, Singer PA, Mckenny J, Naglie G. Assessment of patient capacity to consent to treatment. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14(1):27–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerstenecker A, Niccolai L, Marson D, Triebel KL. Enhancing medical decision-making evaluations: introduction of normative data for the capacity to consent to treatment instrument. Assessment. 2016;23(2):232–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gurrera RJ, Karel MJ, Azar AR, Moye J. Agreement between instruments for rating treatment decisional capacity. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007;15(2):168–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jeste DV, Palmer BW, Appelbaum PS, Golshan S, Glorioso D, Dunn LB, et al. A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(8):966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah A. Kleinfeld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kleinfeld, S.A., Mehta, R., Wicht, E.J. (2019). The Capacity to Make Medical Decisions. In: Balasubramaniam, M., Gupta, A., Tampi, R. (eds) Psychiatric Ethics in Late-Life Patients. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15172-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15172-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15171-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15172-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics