Advertisement

Releasing Personal Information Within Learning Analytics Systems

Chapter

Abstract

Besides the well-documented benefits of learning analytics, serious concerns and challenges are associated with the application of these data-driven systems. Most notably, empirical evidence regarding privacy issues such as for learning analytics is next to nothing. The purpose of this study was to investigate if students are prepared to release any personal data in order to inform learning analytics systems. A total of 330 university students participated in an exploratory study confronting them with learning analytics systems and associated issues of control of data and sharing of information. Findings indicate that sharing of data for educational purposes is correlated to study-related constructs, usage of Internet, awareness of control over data, and expected benefits from a learning analytics system. Based on the relationship between the willingness to release personal data for learning analytics systems and various constructs closely related to individual characteristics of students, it is concluded that students need to be equally involved when implementing learning analytics systems at higher education institutions.

Keywords

Learning analytics Higher education Privacy Control over data Transparency 

References

  1. Berland, M., Baker, R. S., & Bilkstein, P. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics: Applications to constructionist research. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 205–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9223-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bowles, A., Fisher, R., McPhail, R., Rosenstreich, D., & Dobson, A. (2014). Staying the distance: Students’ perception of enablers of transition to higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 212–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Culnan, M. J., & Bies, R. J. (2003). Consumer privacy: Balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 323–342.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00067 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics—It’s a DELICATE issue. A checklist for trusted learning analytics. Paper presented at the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Ennen, N. L., Stark, E., & Lassiter, A. (2015). The importance of trust for satisfaction, motivation, and academic performance in student learning groups. Social Psychology of Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9306-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission. (2014). New modes of learning and teaching in higher education. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  7. Ferguson, R., Hoel, T., Scheffel, M., & Drachsler, H. (2016). Guest editorial: Ethics and privacy in learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Rogers, T., & Gašević, D. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzalez, D. (2015). Managing online risk. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, J. (2014). Contemporary privacy theory contributions to learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(1), 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ifenthaler, D. (2015). Learning analytics. In J. M. Spector (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of educational technology (Vol. 2, pp. 447–451). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Ifenthaler, D. (2017a). Are higher education institutions prepared for learning analytics? TechTrends, 61(4), 366–371.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0154-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ifenthaler, D. (2017b). Learning analytics design. In L. Lin & J. M. Spector (Eds.), The sciences of learning and instructional design. Constructive articulation between communities (pp. 202–211). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ifenthaler, D., Adcock, A. B., Erlandson, B. E., Gosper, M., Greiff, S., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2014). Challenges for education in a connected world: Digital learning, data rich environments, and computer-based assessment—Introduction to the inaugural special issue of technology, knowledge and learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9228-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 923–938.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ifenthaler, D., & Tracey, M. W. (2016). Exploring the relationship of ethics and privacy in learning analytics and design: Implications for the field of educational technology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 877–880.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9480-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ifenthaler, D., & Widanapathirana, C. (2014). Development and validation of a learning analytics framework: Two case studies using support vector machines. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 19(1–2), 221–240.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-014-9226-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kay, D., Korn, N., & Oppennheim, C. (2012). Legal, risk and ethical aspects of analytics. Cetis Analytics Series, 1(6), 1–30.Google Scholar
  20. Kevan, J. M., & Ryan, P. R. (2016). Experience API: Flexible, decentralized and activity-centric data collection. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(1), 143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-015-9260-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lockyer, L., Heathcote, E., & Dawson, S. (2013). Informing pedagogical action: Aligning learning analytics with learning design. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1439–1459.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479367 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Long, P. D., & Siemens, G. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. Educause Review, 46(5), 31–40.Google Scholar
  23. Macfadyen, L., & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-Learning analytics failed to inform an institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 149–163.Google Scholar
  24. Mah, D.-K. (2016). Learning analytics and digital badges: Potential impact on student retention in higher education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 21(3), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nam, C. W. (2014). The effects of trust and constructive controversy on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 237–248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–157.Google Scholar
  27. Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park, Y., & Jo, I.-H. (2015). Development of the learning analytics dashboard to support students’ learning performance. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(1), 110–133.Google Scholar
  29. Pistilli, M. D., & Arnold, K. E. (2010). Purdue signals: Mining real-time academic data to enhance student success. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 15(3), 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2014). Student data privacy and institutional accountability in an age of surveillance. In M. E. Menon, D. G. Terkla, & P. Gibbs (Eds.), Using data to improve higher education. Research, policy and practice (pp. 197–214). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., Wild, K. P., & Winteler, A. (1993). Der “Fragebogen zum Studieninteresse” (FSI). Diagnostica, 39(4), 335–351.Google Scholar
  32. Schumacher, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2018). Features students really expect from learning analytics. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 397–407.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sclater, N., & Bailey, P. (2015). Code of practice for learning analytics. Bristol, UK: Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC).Google Scholar
  34. Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510–1529.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Solove, D. J. (2004). The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Trepte, S., Dienlin, T., & Reinecke, L. (2013). Privacy, self-disclosure, social support, and social network site use. Research report of a Three-Year Panel Study.Google Scholar
  37. Warren, S. D., & Brandeis, L. D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. West, D., Huijser, H., & Heath, D. (2016). Putting an ethical lens on learning analytics. Education Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 903–922.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9464-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Economic and Business Education, Learning, Design and TechnologyUniversity of MannheimMannheimGermany
  3. 3.University of MannheimMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations