Abstract
The substantive reliance on the interrelatedness of nature is one of the most interesting features of indigenous peoples. Current requests for global diversity and higher forms of the quality of life are indeed limited when they are built within the constraints of modern nation-states, which often views diversity as deviance if it does not conform to modern norms and definitions. Traditional indigenous knowledge has the potential for long-lasting approaches to current environment problems and provide us with ideas on how to improve our questions and, therefore, improve our potential for more equitable, less oppressive structures from which to approach the numerous problems. Indigenous Peoples with traditional perspectives and actions can provide us with significant paths to diversity throughout our planet, similar to the so-called ecological system. Internal colonialism and generations of domination create deep complications; therefore, the roles and actions of traditional peoples are central to our future and the generations to come. We can learn that the point is not to simply focus, for example, upon human rights and an anthropocentric sense of keeping things natural or simply being against pollution, but more upon the respect for and learning from nature by traditional indigenous peoples.
There is a big difference between living well and those who believe that living well is to live better than someone else. This latter view reflects a competition instead of respect and equality. Yet, ‘living well’ is the exercise of rights, respect, equality, and means a life for everyone.
—Blanca Chancoso
This chapter is an extension of the continual research on indigenous law-ways with Barbara Grey Kanatiiosh who helped initiate the ideas, and a revision of “Indigenous Peoples in the Face of Globalization.” I would like to thank Karen Cook and the Institute for Research in the Social Sciences at Stanford University, and the School of Social Transformation at ASU and Elsie Moore for supporting this work. I also thank Ron Anderson who provided thoughtful comments on earlier drafts that were very helpful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Connerley, M., & Wu, J. (2015). Handbook on well-being of working women. New York: Springer.
Cruit, M., & Lauderdale, P. (2016). Globalogy and hegemony: A critical perspective (2nd ed.). Phoenix, AZ: SRI Press.
Deloria, V., Jr. (1992). God is red (2nd ed.). Golden, CO: North American Press.
Fayers, P., & Machin, D. (2016). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and reporting of outcomes. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fenelon, J. V., & Hall, T. D. (2005). Indigenous struggles over autonomy, land and community: Anti-globalization and resistance in world systems analysis. In R. Grosfoguel, N. Maldonado-Torres, & J. David Saldivar (Eds.), Latin@s in the world-system: Decolonization struggles in the 21st century U.S. Empire (pp.107–122). Boulder: Paradigm Press.
GrrlScientist, Maniraptora. (2014, March 3). How wolves change rivers. The Guardian.
Hall, T., & Fenelon, J. (2005). Indigenous peoples and hegemonic change: Threats to sovereignty or opportunities for resistance? In J. Friedman & C. Chase-Dunn (Eds.), Hegemonic decline: Present and past (pp. 205–225). Boulder: Paradigm Press.
Hanson, R. D. (2002). Half lives of Reagan’s Indian policy: Marketing nuclear waste to American Indians. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 25(1), 21–44.
Johansen, B. (2003). Indigenous peoples and environmental issues. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Lauderdale, P. (1997). Indigenous North American jurisprudence. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 38, 131–148.
Lauderdale, P., & Gray Kanatiiosh, B. (2007). The great circle of justice: North American indigenous justice and contemporary restoration programs. Contemporary Justice Review, 10(2): 215–225.
Lauderdale, P., & Natividad, N. (2010). Global indigenous rights and responses. In R. Denemark (Ed.), The international studies compendium (pp. 3036–3056). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Lyons, O. (1992). The American Indian in the past. In O. Lyons, J. Mohawk, V. Deloria, Jr., L. Hauptman, D. Grinde, Jr., H. Berman, C. Berkey, & R. Venables, foreword by Peter Matthiessen, preface by Daniel K. Imouye, Exiled in the land of the free: Democracy, Indian nations, and the U.S. Constitution (pp. 13–42). Santa Fe, NM: Clear Light Publications.
Mann, C. C. (2005). 1491: New revelations of the Americas before columbus. New York: Knopf.
Nader, L. (2002). The life of the law. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Oliverio, A., & Lauderdale, P. (2005). Terrorism: A new testament. ON, Canada: de Sitter Publications.
Oliverio, A., & Lauderdale, P. (2015). The world system according to Andre Gunder Frank: Hegemony and domination (Andre Gunder Frank’s Reorienting the 19th century). Journal of World-Systems Research, 21(1).
Phillips, R., & Wharton, C. (2015). Growing livelihoods: Local food systems and development. New York: Routledge.
Pommersheim, F. (1995). Braid of feathers: American Indian law and contemporary tribal life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Rodriguez, P., & Lauderdale, P. (2014). Hegemony and collective memories: Japanese American relocation and imprisonment on American Indian “Land.” In S. Bowman (Ed.), Color behind bars: Racism in the U.S. (pp. 119–133). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Greenwood Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lauderdale, P. (2019). An Indigenous Perspective on Quality of Life. In: Kee, Y., Lee, S., Phillips, R. (eds) Perspectives on Community Well-Being . Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15115-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15115-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15114-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15115-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)