Abstract
Argentina’s tax-to-GDP ratio ranked at the bottom of worldwide tables of middle-income countries prior to the 2000s. By 2015, Argentina transformed from a low-tax to a high-tax country matching Brazil for the highest tax-to-GDP ratio in the region. No tax expert anticipated this outcome—quite the opposite. A rise in Value-Added Tax (VAT) revenue occurred as overall tax revenue increased, and this trend continued after a period of economic growth ended. This chapter explains how the government engineered this result by way of financial inclusion measures that targeted middle-class Argentines and their inclusion into the formal banking system. As financial inclusion drew more people into the formal banking system, consumers began to use less cash and more credit and debit cards causing more consumption to occur in formal markets (“easily taxed”) and less in informal markets (“less taxed”).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Argentina in the twentieth century experienced six military coups (1930, 1943, 1955, 1962, 1966, and 1976); the last produced the military regime responsible for the Dirty War (1976–1983) and an estimated 30,000 Argentine deaths. Each coup had strong rural elite support and military regimes disproportionately targeted their violence toward urban political groups—labor unions, lawyers, university students and professors, and intellectuals—as well as implemented economic policies favorable to the agro-export sector. Also, Argentine coups are rooted in intra-military conflicts, these tended to pit the army, which heavily recruited from the interior, against the navy, which heavily recruited from the urban middle classes . Besides the Dirty War horrors, rapid urbanization and a dwindling rural population help to account for the lack of a military coup since 1983.
- 2.
The political science literature links high tax revenue in a country to the strength of left-center and labor-based political parties, urbanization and the strength and autonomy of the state (see Steinmo 1993; Brautigam et al. 2008). Europe’s social democratic parties inspire this literature. By these assumptions, however, Argentina’s tax revenue during the past several decades should have been high. The pro-labor Peronist Party has been the strongest political force since the 1940s, rapid urbanization started in the 1950s, and state capacity is demonstrated by the country’s healthcare and education systems that were regional leaders in the twentieth century.
- 3.
Three annual snapshots at decade intervals show trends in government spending-to-GDP in the Southern Cone countries of South America : 1977 (Argentina 9.02%, Brazil 9.44%, Chile 13.94%, and Uruguay 12.74%), 1987 (Argentina 4.71%, Brazil 12.16%, Chile 10.12%, and Uruguay 13.22%) and 1997 (Argentina 12.06%, Brazil 19.54%, Chile 11.12%, and Uruguay 11.04%). Argentine government spending was lower than that of its neighbors, especially so in the 1980s, and this pattern only changed, oddly, after Argentina adopted radical neoliberal liberalization policies in the 1990s at which point, Argentina caught up with Chile and Uruguay, but remained well behind Brazil. Finally, counter to conventional wisdom, Argentine annual spending ratios in 2016 (18.03%) and 2017 (18.11%) under current neoliberal President Macri were the two highest years since 1960!
- 4.
Argentina ’s historic September 2018 agreement with the IMF for a record $57 billion calls on the government to reduce the budget deficit from its current 2.9 to 0% of GDP in 2019. Public spending cuts occurred in 2016 and 2017, including layoffs of 33,700 state workers and major cuts to utility subsidies, meaning it is tough to see how IMF conditionality is met without a major boost in tax revenue. Export taxes, slashed in January 2016, were reintroduced in June 2018 in consultations with the IMF, but the scale of revenue that will be needed must come from VAT . Neither the IMF nor the Macri government desires higher corporate or income taxes, as the IMF loan and program are tied to attracting foreign investment, and lots of it.
- 5.
- 6.
The 1990 reform follows the recommendations of a World Bank (1989: 67) assessment team in the country in 1989: “The VAT would be generalized to all goods and services, at a uniform rate, which could be the present 15 percent or the 18 percent prevailing until August 1988.”
- 7.
Data on card ownership are only available annually and start in 2002. Card spending data are also annual and are available starting in 2007. Therefore, our models are limited to sample sizes of 14 (years) for models 1–4 and 8 (years) for model 5.
References
Acemoglu, D., and J. Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail, the Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.
Aizenman, J., and Y. Jinjarak. 2005. “The Collection Efficiency of the Value Added Tax: Theory and International Experience.” NBER Working Paper 11539. http://www.nber.org/papers/w11539.
Bergman, M. S. 2003. “Tax Reforms and Tax Compliance: The Divergent Paths of Chile and Argentina.” Journal of Latin American Studies 35 (3): 593–624.
Bertranou, F., L. Casanova, M. Jimenez, and M. Jimenez. 2014. Informality and Employment Quality in Argentina: Country Case Study on Labour Market Segmentation. www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_protect/—protrav/—travail/documents/publication/wcms_313839.pdf.
Bird, R. M. 1992. “Tax Reform in Latin America: A Review of Some Recent Experiences.” Latin American Research Review 27 (1): 7–36.
Bird, R. M., and P. P. Gendron. 2007. The VAT in Developing and Transitional Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bloomberg. 2017. “Argentina Ends 5 Percent VAT Rebate on Debit Cards.” January 6.
Boadway, R., and M. Sato. 2008. “Optimal Tax Design and Enforcement with an Informal Sector.” Queen’s Economics Department Working Paper No. 1168, Kingston, ON.
Brautigam, D., O. Fjeldstad, and M. Moore. 2008. Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries, Capacity and Consent. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Calvert, S., and P. Calvert. 1989. Argentina: Political Culture and Instability. London: Macmillan.
Canterbery, E. R. 1983. “Tax Reform and Incomes Policy: A VATIP Proposal.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5 (3): 430–439.
Central Bank of the Argentine Republic. 2014. Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Financial System. www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bcra.gov.ar%2Fpdfs%2Festadistica%2Fbaldethis.xls&ei=6_aEU5uuMcbJsQTIo4DYCg&usg=AFQjCNEVmhq49SATyCuoZvkPKDVoisrApg&sig2=08b2PTV3bSd9t5hSDK1EOQ&bvm=bv.67720277,d.cWc.
Cetrangolo, O., and J. C. G. Sabaini. 2009. “Tax Policy in Argentina: Between Solvency and Emergency.” Initiative for Policy Dialogue Working Paper Series, Columbia University, October.
Cortés Conde, R. 2013. The Political Economy of Argentina in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Deese, W., and J. Reeder. 2008. “Export Taxes on Agricultural Products: Recent History and Economic Modeling of Soya Bean Export Taxes in Argentina.” Journal of International Commerce and Trade 1: 185.
Di Tella, G., and R. Dornbusch. 1989. The Political Economy of Argentina, 1946–1983. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Eaton, K. 2002. Politicians and Economic Reform in New Democracies: Argentina and the Philippines in the 1990s. University Park: Penn State Press.
Ebrill, L., M. Keen, J. P. Bodin, and V. Summers. 2001. The Modern VAT. Washington, DC: IMF.
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2005. Assessing Payments Systems in Latin America. http://graphics.eiu.com/files/ad_pdfs/eiu_visa_eng_wp.pdf.
Emran, S., and J. Stiglitz. 2005. “On Selective Indirect Tax Reform in Developing Countries.” Journal of Public Economics 89 (4): 599–623.
Euromonitor International. 2017. Argentina Statistics. Retrieved from Euromonitor Passport GMID Database.
Fairfield, T. 2011. “Business Power and Protest: Argentina’s Agricultural Producers Protest in Comparative Context.” Studies in Comparative International Development 46 (4): 424–453.
Feinberg, R. 1986. “Credit Cards as Spending Facilitating Stimuli: A Conditioning Interpretation.” Journal of Consumer Research 13 (3): 348–356.
Frenkel, R. 2006. “An Alternative to Inflation Targeting in Latin America: Macroeconomic Policies Focused on Employment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 28 (4): 573–591.
Jones, M., P. Sanguinetti, and M. Tommasi. 2000. “Politics, Institutions, and Fiscal Performance in a Federal System: An Analysis of the Argentine Provinces.” Journal of Development Economics 61: 305–333.
Kaufman, R. 2011. “The Political Left, the Export Boom, and the Populist Temptation.” In The Resurgence of the Latin American Left, ed. S. Levitsky and K. Roberts. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Keen, M., and B. Lockwood. 2010. “The Value Added Tax: Its Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Development Economics 92 (2): 138–151.
Levi, M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lustig, N., and D. McLeod. 2009. Are Latin America’s New Left Regimes Reducing Inequality Faster? Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars, Latin American Program (July).
Lustig, N., and C. Pessino. 2012. “Social Spending and Income Redistribution in Argentina During the 2000s: The Rising Role of Noncontributory Pensions.” Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Universidad del CEMA, Área: economía, No. 499.
Mahon, J. 2004. “Causes of Tax Reform in Latin America, 1977–1995.” Latin American Research Review 39 (1): 3–30.
Mandell, L. 1990. The Credit Card Industry: A History. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Marx, K. 1990. Capital: Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.
Melo, M. A. 2007. “Institutional Weakness and the Puzzle of Argentina’s Low Taxation.” Latin American Politics and Society 49 (4): 115–148.
Migdal, J. 1988. Strong Societies and Weak States, State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Nicolini, J. P., J. Posadas, J. Sanguinetti, P. Sanguinetti, and M. Tommasi. 2002. “Decentralization, Fiscal Discipline in Sub-National Governments and the Bailout Problem: The Case of Argentina.” Inter-American Development Bank Research Network Working Paper.
North, D., and R. P. Thomas. 1973. The Rise of the Western World, A New Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
OECD. 2017. “Revenue Statistics in Latin America: Comparative Tables.” OECD. stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=RSLACT#.
Richardson, N. P. 2009. “Export-Oriented Populism: Commodities and Coalitions in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 44 (3): 228–255.
Rock, D. 1987. Argentina 1516–1987: From Spanish Colonization to Alfonsín. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Steinmo, S. 1993. Taxation & Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tanzi, V. 2007. Argentina: An Economic Chronicle. New York: Pinto Books.
Teera, J., and J. Hudson. 2004. “Tax Performance: A Comparative Study.” Journal of International Development 16 (6): 785–802.
TheGlobalEconomy. 2018. “Government Spending as a Percent of GDP.” https://www.theglobaleconomy.com/.
Trigueros, M., F. Longinotti, and J. Vecorena. 2013. “Estimating Tax Noncompliance in Latin America: 2000–2010.” International Tax Compact. www.taxcompact.net/documents/ITC_2013-05_Estimating-tax-non-compliance-in-LAC.pdf.
World Bank. 1987. “The Argentinean Experience with the Value-Added Tax.” World Bank Document #DRD235.
World Bank. 1989. “Argentina: Tax Policy for Stabilization and Economic Recovery.” World Bank. documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/923791468209363007/pdf/multi-page.pdf.
World Bank. 1993. “Effects of Tax Reform on Argentina’s Revenues.” WPS 1192.
World Bank. 2013. “Shifting Gears to Accelerated Shared Prosperity in Latin America and the Caribbean.” World Bank Document #78507.
World Bank. 2017. “DataBank.” World Bank. databank.worldbank.org/data/home.aspx.
Zandi, M., V. Singh, and J. Irving. 2013. The Impact of Electronic Payments on Economic Growth. usa.visa.com/download/corporate/_media/moodys-economy-white-paper-feb-2013.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mitchell, K., Scott, R.H. (2019). Public Revenue, Financial Inclusion and Value-Added Tax in Argentina. In: Pesos or Plastic?. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14876-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14876-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14875-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14876-8
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)