Advertisement

Multiplex Learning: An Evidence-Based Approach to Design Policy Learning Networks in Sub-Saharan Africa for the SDGs

  • Serdar TürkeliEmail author
  • Pui-Hang Wong
  • Eleni Abraham Yitbarek
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Development Goals Series book series (SDGS)

Abstract

Although most scholars acknowledged that development is a transnational process, existing discussions usually focus on negative externalities such as pollution, epidemics, violent conflicts and economic crises. This chapter considers a form of positive externality, knowledge spillovers and argues that countries can innovate in policymaking, both design and implementation, and achieve more sustainable forms of development by participating in a multiplex policy learning network. Furthermore, we emphasise that policy knowledge transfer should not be one-way, so global governance becomes a truly inclusive and interactive process. One fundamental problem to this end is the design of such multiplex policy learning networks. This chapter adopts an evidence-based approach to this problem. Using quantitative analysis, we identify performance-based clusters of status leaders, intermediates and followers in Sub-Saharan Africa with respect to the constituents of indicator-based performances on each Sustainable Development Goal (SDG), and offer a detailed contextualisation for multiplex policy learning in Sub-Saharan Africa with a prospective design of an international conference agenda for SDGs.

Keywords

Cluster analysis Evidence-based policy Sub-Saharan Africa Sustainable development goals 

References

  1. Alkire S, Meinzen-Dick R, Peterman A, Quisumbing A, Seymour G, Vaz A (2013) The women’s empowerment in agriculture index. World Dev 52:71–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blohmke J, Kemp R, Türkeli S (2016) Disentangling the causal structure behind environmental regulation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 103:174–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castellacci F, Archibugi D (2008) The technology clubs: the distribution of knowledge across nations. Res Policy 37(10):1659–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cai F (2012) Is there a “middle-income trap”? Theories, experiences and relevance to China. China World Econ 20(1):49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coca Cola Company (2015). Rain: the replenish Africa initiative. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/rain-the-replenish-africa-initiative. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  6. Cook IR, Ward K (2012) Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: the process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready’. Eur Urban Reg Stud 19(2):137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Pryck JD (2013) Good practice policies to eliminate gender inequalities in fish value chains. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  8. Duflo E (2012) Women empowerment and economic development. J Econ Lit 50(4):1051–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn WN (2015) Public policy analysis. Routledge, AbingdonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichengreen B, Park D, Shin K (2013) Growth slowdowns redux: new evidence on the middle-income trap (No. w18673). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Europe, P.I. (2010). European innovation scoreboard (EIS) 2009. Pro Inno Europe Paper, (15)Google Scholar
  12. Freund CL, Weinhold D (2004) The effect of the Internet on international trade. J Int Econ 62(1):171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fontana M, Natali L (2008) Gendered patterns of time use in Tanzania: Public investment in infrastructure can help. IFPRI Project on ‘Evaluating the Long-Term Impact of Gender-focused Policy Interventions’. IFPRI, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. McCann E, Ward K (2012) Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Polit Stud Rev 10(3):325–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gault F (2015) Measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Working paper series #2015-038. Maastricht Economic and social Research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU‐MERIT), MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  16. Griggs DJ, Nilsson M, Stevance A, McCollum D (2017) A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. International Council for Science, ParisGoogle Scholar
  17. International Fund for Agricultural Development (2009) Gender in agriculture sourcebook. World Bank, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. MEDIAFRICA (2015) What makes a society internet society? http://www.mediafrica.no/blog/2015/11/22/is-botswana-an-internet-society. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  19. Metcalfe JS (1994) Evolutionary economics and technology policy. Econ J 104(425):931–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mucha PJ, Richardson T, Macon K, Porter MA, Onnela JP (2010) Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science 328(5980):876–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nauwelaers C, Wintjes R (2002) Innovating SMEs and regions: the need for policy intelligence and interactive policies. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 14(2):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reggio I (2011) The influence of the mother’s power on her child’s labor in Mexico. J Dev Econ 96(1):95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Durand-Delacre D, Teksoz K (2017) SDG index and dashboards report 2017. Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. SDG Gateway (2017) Amsterdam initiative against malnutrition exploring innovative and sustainable solutions to address malnutrition. https://gateway.sdgcharter.nl/amsterdaminitiativeagainstmalnutrition. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  25. Smits R, Kuhlmann S (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. Int J Foresight Innovation Policy 1(1-2):4–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stone D (2012) Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Stud 33(6):483–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turkeli S, Wintjes RJM (2014) Towards the societal system of innovation: the case of metropolitan areas in Europe. Maastricht economic and social research institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU‐MERIT), MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  28. United Nations (UN) (2014) Every dollar invested in water, sanitation brings four-fold return in costs. https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/11/484032-every-dollar-invested-water-sanitation-brings-four-fold-return-costs-un. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  29. United Nations (UN) (2017) Billions around the world lack safe water, proper sanitation facilities, reveals UN report. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2017/07/billions-around-the-world-lack-safe-water-proper-sanitation-facilities-reveals-un-report/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  30. United Nations (UN) Women (2015a). Senegalese rural women strive for the sustainable use of sea resources. http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2015/9/senegalese-women-sustainable-use-of-sea-resources. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  31. United Nations (UN) Women (2015b). Women play a crucial role in marine environments and fisheries. http://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/news-and-events/stories/2015/09/women-play-a-crucial-role-in-marine-environments-and-fisheries-economies. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  32. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2016) Empowering women and youth through road infrastructure development in Uganda. http://www.ug.undp.org/content/uganda/en/home/library/womens_empowerment/EmpoweringWomenandYouththroughRoadInfrastructureDevelopmentInUganda.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2018
  33. Vigneau E, Qannari EM (2003) Clustering of variables around latent components. Commun Stat-Simul Comput 32(4):1131–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wallerstein IM (2004) World-systems analysis: an introduction. Duke University Press, Durham, NCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. World Economic Forum (WEF). (2017). 3 unexpected ways the internet is transforming the Africa. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/05/3-unexpected-ways-the-internet-is-transforming-africa/. Accessed 26 Jan 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serdar Türkeli
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pui-Hang Wong
    • 1
  • Eleni Abraham Yitbarek
    • 2
  1. 1.Maastricht University and United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations