Ricardo, Keynes and Stiglitz: The Epistemological Convergences

  • Alain HerscoviciEmail author


Heterogeneity is defined from two temporal dimensions: the first one is related to the evaluation of a stock composed by heterogeneous capitals, in a specific point of time. The second dimension is related to the comparison of the value of some stock of capital in different periods. From such perspective, I will demonstrate why the Ricardian and the Keynesian methods are dynamic while the neoclassical one is, by nature, static.


  1. Akerlof, G. 1970. The Market for “Lemons”: Qualitative Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (August): 488–500.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, Kenneth J. 1986. Rationality of Self and Others in an Economic System. The Journal of Business 59 (4): 385–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bidard, Christian 2014. The Ricardian Rent Theory Two Centuries after, Document de travail Working Paper 2014–54, Université de Paris Ouest Nanterre la Défense.Google Scholar
  4. Bortkiewicz, Ladislauss von. 1959. Essai de rectification de la construction théorique fondamentale de Marx dans le troisième livre du Capital. Cahiers de l’ ISEA 76 (janv.): 20–36. Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, Avi J., and Harcourt G.C. 2003. Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies? Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 (Winter).Google Scholar
  6. Dávila-Fernández, Marwiland, and José Luis Oreiro. 2016. Piketty in the Light of Pasinetti and Foley: Income Distribution, Economic Growth and Financial Fragility, Revista de Economia Política, São Paulo, vol. 36, nº 4 (145): 667–683, October–December/2016.Google Scholar
  7. Dvoskin, Ariel, and Saverio M. Fratini. 2016. On the Samuelson–Etula Master Function and the Capital Controversy. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (6): 1032–1058. Scholar
  8. Grossman, S.J., and J.E. Stiglitz. 1976. Information and Competitive Price system. The American Economic Review 66 (2) (May): 246–253.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1980. On the Impossibility of Informationally Efficient Markets. The American Economic Review 70 (3) (June): 393–408.Google Scholar
  10. Harcourt, G.C. 1972. Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayek, F.H. 2009 [1950]. The Pure Theory of Capital. Auburn, AL: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  12. Herscovici, Alain. 2002. Dinâmica Macroeconômica: uma interpretação a partir de Marx e de Keynes. São Paulo: EDUC/EDUFES.Google Scholar
  13. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1955–1956. Alternative Theories of Distribution. The Review of Economic Studies 23 (2): 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keynes, John Maynard. 2009 [1936]. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. New York: Classic Books America.Google Scholar
  15. Kurz, Heinz D., and N. Salvadori. 2010. Sraffa and the Labour Theory of Value. A Few Observations. In Economic Theory and Economic Thought, ed. John Vint, J. Stanley Metcalfe, Heinz D. Kurz, Neri Salvadori, and Paul Samuelson, 187–213. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Kurz, Heinz D., and N. Salvadori. 2014. Classical Economics After Sraffa, Paper Given at the Conference “What have we learnt on Classical Economics Since Sraffa?”, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre, (October): 16–17.Google Scholar
  17. Martins, Nuno Ornela. 2013. The Cambridge Contribution to the Revival of Classical Political Economy. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Orléan, André. 2011. L’empire de la valeur. Refonder l’Économie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  19. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Polanyi, Karl. 1992 [1944]. The Great Transformation, La Grande Transformation. The Politic and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ricardo, David. 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, 3rd ed. Ontario: Batoche Books 2001.Google Scholar
  22. Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1983 [1954]. Histoire de l’analyse économique. L’âge de la science—III. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  23. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1987 The Causes and Consequences of the Dependence of Quality on Price. Journal of Economic Literature XXV (March): 1–48.Google Scholar
  24. Tirole, Jean. 2016. Economie du bien commun. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  25. Winternitz, J. 1948. Values and Prices: A Solution of the So-Called Transformation Problem. Economic Journal 58: 276–280. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Federal do Espírito SantoVitóriaBrazil

Personalised recommendations