Skip to main content

An Independence Measure for Expert Collections Based on Social Media Profiles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11432))

Abstract

According to current research, a crowd can outperform experts. Surowiecki in his work, has distinguished decentralization, independence, and diversity as key factors of good crowd performance. Due to lack of mathematical models for modelling these aspects, it is still impossible to prove that they have a big impact on the crowd performance. For solving this problem one of the very important crowd metrics called independence measure should be defined and this is the objective of our paper. Proposed measure allows calculating independence values based on data from social media profiles. The biggest advantage of the measure is the possibility of calculating an independence value for a group of people before it could become a collective for realizing concrete objectives. Currently, known solutions largely simplify the problem by describing independence with a single value. The solution presented in the article assumes that the value of the independence is calculated for a specific topic (the calculated value is part of a vector describing the independence between two experts).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fadul, J.A.: Collective learning: applying distributed cognition for collective intelligence. Int. J. Learn. 16(4) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hong, H., Du, Q., Wang, G., Fan, W., Xu, D.: Crowd wisdom: the impact of opinion diversity and participant independence on crowd performance (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, L., Page, S.E.: Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101(46), 16385–16389 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Surowiecki, J.: The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. McHugh, K.A., Yammarino, F.J., Dionne, S.D., Serban, A., Sayama, H., Chatterjee, S.: Collective decision making, leadership, and collective intelligence: tests with agent-based simulations and a field study. Leadersh. Quart. 27(2), 218–241 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krause, J., Ruxton, G.D., Krause, S.: Swarm intelligence in animals and humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25(1), 28–34 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lorenz, J., Rauhut, H., Schweitzer, F., Helbing, D.: How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108(22), 9020–9025 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Milgram, S.: Behavioral study of obedience. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67(4), 371 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miligram, S.: Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. Harper & Row, New York (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nofer, M., Hinz, O.: Are crowds on the internet wiser than experts? The case of a stock prediction community. J. Bus. Econ. 84(3), 303–338 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lévy, P.: From social computing to reflexive collective intelligence: the IEML research program. Inf. Sci. 180(1), 71–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Palak, R., Nguyen, N.T.: Prediction markets as a vital part of collective intelligence. In: IEEE International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), pp. 137–142. IEEE, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Scharfstein, D.S., Stein, J.C.: Herd behavior and investment. Am. Econ. Rev. 80, 465–479 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schreier, M., Fuchs, C., Dahl, D.W.: The innovation effect of user design: exploring consumers’ innovation perceptions of firms selling products designed by users. J. Market. 76(5), 18–32 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sinha, R.R., Swearingen, K.: Comparing recommendations made by online systems and friends. In: DELOS Workshop: Personalisation and Recommender Systems in Digital Libraries (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Szuba, T.: A formal definition of the phenomenon of collective intelligence and its IQ measure. Fut. Gener. Comput. Syst. 17(4), 489–500 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ho, T.H., Chen, K.Y.: New product blockbusters: the magic and science of prediction markets. Calif. Manag. Rev. 50(1), 144–158 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Malone, T.W., Bernstein, M.S.: Handbook of Collective Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafał Palak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Palak, R., Nguyen, N.T. (2019). An Independence Measure for Expert Collections Based on Social Media Profiles. In: Nguyen, N., Gaol, F., Hong, TP., Trawiński, B. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11432. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14802-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14802-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14801-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14802-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics