Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Human Examples to Teach Evolution to High School Students: Increasing Understanding and Decreasing Cognitive Biases and Misconceptions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolution Education Re-considered

Abstract

Life science educators seek pedagogical approaches to help students better understand natural selection , but students’ understanding is impeded by cognitive biases , misconceptions , and resistance to learning about the content due to perceived cultural and religious conflicts. In this chapter, we review the impact of implementing constructivist , guided inquiry ‘mini-units’ that focus on examples of natural selection in humans on advanced US high school students’ understanding of key concepts, and the frequency of cognitive biases and misconceptions . We also describe the effect of supplementing this instruction with lessons that help teachers negotiate student resistance to learning about evolution due to religious or cultural beliefs. Data from students in Advanced Placement (AP) Biology courses in the classrooms of ten different teachers from eight states show significant gains in evolution understanding from pretest to posttest in students’ understanding of variation, heritability, differential survival, and frequency/distribution, and a significant decrease in cognitive biases and misconceptions when responding to prompts about change in both human and mice. When the instruction was supplemented with activities to help teachers create a supportive classroom environment in which religious or cultural resistance was managed, we observed significantly greater gains in student understanding in the same four key concepts and significantly larger decreases in the teleology cognitive bias and need misconception using a mouse example and no significant differences in a human example. Overall, the results from this design-based study suggest that focusing on human examples in a constructivist pedagogical approach while negotiating students’ perceived conflicts to learning about evolution may be effective and warrants further study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AAAS. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. D. (2007). Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Science Education, 91, 664–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. M., Kalinowski, S. T., & Leonard, M. J. (2011a). “Are humans evolving?” A classroom discussion to change student misconceptions regarding natural selection. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 456–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011b). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 394–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, T. M., Price, R. M., Mead, L. S., McElhinny, T. L., Thanukos, A., Perez, K. E., et al. (2012). Biology undergraduates’ misconceptions about genetic drift. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 248–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2014). Foundation to year 10 curriculum: Language for interaction (ACELA1428). Available at: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/english/curriculum/f-10?layout=1#cdcode=ACELA1428&level=F. Retrieved December 15, 2017.

  • Beardsley, P. M., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Kruse, R. A., Eckstrand, I. A., Gordon, S. D., & Odenwald, W. F. (2011). Evolution and medicine: An inquiry-based high school curriculum supplement. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 603–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beardsley, P. M., Bloom, M. V., & Wise, S. B. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for teaching and designing effective K-12 evolution curricula. In K. D. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 287–310). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkman, M. B., Pacheco, J. S., & Plutzer, E. (2008). Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: A national portrait. PLoS Biology, 6(5), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertka, C., Pobiner, B., Beardsley, P., & Watson, W. (2019). Acknowledging students concerns above evolution: a proactive teaching strategy. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0095-0

  • Borgerding, L. A., Klein, V. A., Ghosh, R., & Eibel, A. (2015). Student teachers’ approaches to teaching biological evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramschreiber, T. L. (2013). Teaching evolution: Strategies for conservative school communities. Race Equality Teaching, 32, 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science and Education, 87, 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coburn, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3 and 4 framework document. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum. Retrieved December 15, 2017.

  • Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 156–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97, 723–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science and Education, 17, 1011–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, R. S. (2012). Cognitive apartheid: On the manner in which high school students understand evolution without believing in evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, R. S. (2013). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: Implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 597–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, E. L., & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79, 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds: How natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In K. D. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 66–92). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., & Strayer, J. (2002). Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. American Biology Teacher, 64, 189–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Obfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J., & Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (EGALT). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REESE Project 0909999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. American Biology Teacher, 74, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, D. (2010). Understanding of evolution may be improved by thinking about people. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz-y-Mino, C. G., & Espinosa, A. (2009). Assessment of biology majors ‘versus nonmajors’ views on evolution, creationism, and intelligent design. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pobiner, B., Beardsley, P. M., Berkta, C. M., & Watson, W. A. (2018). Using human case studies to teach evolution in high school A.P. biology classrooms. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-018-0077-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pobiner, B. L. (2016). Accepting, understanding, teaching, and learning (human) evolution: Obstacles and opportunities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159, 232–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, E. A., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Teaching for transformative experiences and conceptual change: A case study and evaluation of a high school biology teacher’s experience. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 273–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, M. A., & Thanukos, A. (2011). Accepting evolution or creation in people, critters, plants, and classrooms: the maelstrom of American cognition about biological change. In R. Taylor, & M. Ferrari (Eds.) Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution versus intelligent design controversy (pp. 143–172). Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., Mcconaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 189–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science and Education, 19, 539–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The College Board. (2011). AP biology curriculum framework 2012–2013. New York, NY: The College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhey, S. D. (2005). The effect of engaging prior learning on student attitudes towards creationism and evolution. BioScience, 55, 996–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werth, A. J. (2009). Clearing the highest hurdle: Human-based case studies broaden students’ knowledge of core evolutionary concepts. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 9, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werth, A. J. (2012). Avoiding the pitfall of progress and associated perils of evolutionary education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2005). Evolution for everyone: How to increase acceptance of, interest in, and knowledge about evolution. PLoS Biology, 3(12), e364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Human Origins Program, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA

    Briana Pobiner

  2. Learning Research Across the Divide, Haddon Heights, NJ, USA

    William A. Watson

  3. Department of Biological Sciences, Cal Poly Pomona, Pomona, CA, USA

    Paul M. Beardsley

  4. Science and Society Resources, LLC, Potomac, MD, USA

    Constance M. Bertka

Authors
  1. Briana Pobiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William A. Watson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paul M. Beardsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Constance M. Bertka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Briana Pobiner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. IPN - Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education at Kiel University, Kiel, Germany

    Ute Harms

  2. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Michael J. Reiss

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pobiner, B., Watson, W.A., Beardsley, P.M., Bertka, C.M. (2019). Using Human Examples to Teach Evolution to High School Students: Increasing Understanding and Decreasing Cognitive Biases and Misconceptions. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation