Abstract
Life science educators seek pedagogical approaches to help students better understand natural selection , but students’ understanding is impeded by cognitive biases , misconceptions , and resistance to learning about the content due to perceived cultural and religious conflicts. In this chapter, we review the impact of implementing constructivist , guided inquiry ‘mini-units’ that focus on examples of natural selection in humans on advanced US high school students’ understanding of key concepts, and the frequency of cognitive biases and misconceptions . We also describe the effect of supplementing this instruction with lessons that help teachers negotiate student resistance to learning about evolution due to religious or cultural beliefs. Data from students in Advanced Placement (AP) Biology courses in the classrooms of ten different teachers from eight states show significant gains in evolution understanding from pretest to posttest in students’ understanding of variation, heritability, differential survival, and frequency/distribution, and a significant decrease in cognitive biases and misconceptions when responding to prompts about change in both human and mice. When the instruction was supplemented with activities to help teachers create a supportive classroom environment in which religious or cultural resistance was managed, we observed significantly greater gains in student understanding in the same four key concepts and significantly larger decreases in the teleology cognitive bias and need misconception using a mouse example and no significant differences in a human example. Overall, the results from this design-based study suggest that focusing on human examples in a constructivist pedagogical approach while negotiating students’ perceived conflicts to learning about evolution may be effective and warrants further study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AAAS. (2011). Vision and change in undergraduate biology education: A call to action. Washington, DC: AAAS.
Anderson, R. D. (2007). Teaching the theory of evolution in social, intellectual, and pedagogical context. Science Education, 91, 664–677.
Andrews, T. M., Kalinowski, S. T., & Leonard, M. J. (2011a). “Are humans evolving?” A classroom discussion to change student misconceptions regarding natural selection. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 456–466.
Andrews, T. M., Leonard, M. J., Colgrove, C. A., & Kalinowski, S. T. (2011b). Active learning not associated with student learning in a random sample of college biology courses. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10, 394–405.
Andrews, T. M., Price, R. M., Mead, L. S., McElhinny, T. L., Thanukos, A., Perez, K. E., et al. (2012). Biology undergraduates’ misconceptions about genetic drift. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 11, 248–259.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2014). Foundation to year 10 curriculum: Language for interaction (ACELA1428). Available at: http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/english/curriculum/f-10?layout=1#cdcode=ACELA1428&level=F. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
Beardsley, P. M., Stuhlsatz, M. A. M., Kruse, R. A., Eckstrand, I. A., Gordon, S. D., & Odenwald, W. F. (2011). Evolution and medicine: An inquiry-based high school curriculum supplement. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 603–612.
Beardsley, P. M., Bloom, M. V., & Wise, S. B. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for teaching and designing effective K-12 evolution curricula. In K. D. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 287–310). New York: Oxford University Press.
Berkman, M. B., Pacheco, J. S., & Plutzer, E. (2008). Evolution and creationism in America’s classrooms: A national portrait. PLoS Biology, 6(5), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060124.
Bertka, C., Pobiner, B., Beardsley, P., & Watson, W. (2019). Acknowledging students concerns above evolution: a proactive teaching strategy. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0095-0
Borgerding, L. A., Klein, V. A., Ghosh, R., & Eibel, A. (2015). Student teachers’ approaches to teaching biological evolution. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26, 371–392.
Bramschreiber, T. L. (2013). Teaching evolution: Strategies for conservative school communities. Race Equality Teaching, 32, 10–14.
Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science and Education, 87, 181–206.
Coburn, W. W. (1996). Worldview theory and conceptual change in science education. Science Education, 80, 579–610.
Department of Education. (2014). The national curriculum in England: Key stages 3 and 4 framework document. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-secondary-curriculum. Retrieved December 15, 2017.
Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217–266.
Gregory, T. R. (2009). Understanding natural selection: Essential concepts and common misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 156–175.
Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97, 723–744.
Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science and Education, 17, 1011–1032.
Hermann, R. S. (2012). Cognitive apartheid: On the manner in which high school students understand evolution without believing in evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 619–628.
Hermann, R. S. (2013). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: Implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 597–616.
Ingram, E. L., & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 7–24.
Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79, 147–166.
Kelemen, D. (2012). Teleological minds: How natural intuitions about agency and purpose influence learning about evolution. In K. D. Rosengren, S. K. Brem, E. M. Evans, G. M. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 66–92). New York: Oxford University Press.
McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., & Strayer, J. (2002). Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. American Biology Teacher, 64, 189–192.
Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Obfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J., & Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (EGALT). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REESE Project 0909999.
Nehm, R. H., Beggrow, E. P., Opfer, J. E., & Ha, M. (2012). Reasoning about natural selection: Diagnosing contextual competency using the ACORNS instrument. American Biology Teacher, 74, 92–98.
Nettle, D. (2010). Understanding of evolution may be improved by thinking about people. Evolutionary Psychology, 8, 205–228.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Paz-y-Mino, C. G., & Espinosa, A. (2009). Assessment of biology majors ‘versus nonmajors’ views on evolution, creationism, and intelligent design. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2, 75–83.
Pobiner, B., Beardsley, P. M., Berkta, C. M., & Watson, W. A. (2018). Using human case studies to teach evolution in high school A.P. biology classrooms. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 11, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-018-0077-7.
Pobiner, B. L. (2016). Accepting, understanding, teaching, and learning (human) evolution: Obstacles and opportunities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159, 232–274.
Pugh, K. J., Linnenbrink-Garcia, E. A., Koskey, K. L. K., Stewart, V. C., & Manzey, C. (2010). Teaching for transformative experiences and conceptual change: A case study and evaluation of a high school biology teacher’s experience. Cognition and Instruction, 28, 273–316.
Ranney, M. A., & Thanukos, A. (2011). Accepting evolution or creation in people, critters, plants, and classrooms: the maelstrom of American cognition about biological change. In R. Taylor, & M. Ferrari (Eds.) Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution versus intelligent design controversy (pp. 143–172). Oxford: Routledge.
Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., Mcconaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.
Sinatra, G. M., Brem, S. K., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 189–195.
Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science and Education, 19, 539–571.
The College Board. (2011). AP biology curriculum framework 2012–2013. New York, NY: The College Board.
Verhey, S. D. (2005). The effect of engaging prior learning on student attitudes towards creationism and evolution. BioScience, 55, 996–1003.
Werth, A. J. (2009). Clearing the highest hurdle: Human-based case studies broaden students’ knowledge of core evolutionary concepts. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 9, 38–53.
Werth, A. J. (2012). Avoiding the pitfall of progress and associated perils of evolutionary education. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 249–265.
Wilson, D. S. (2005). Evolution for everyone: How to increase acceptance of, interest in, and knowledge about evolution. PLoS Biology, 3(12), e364.
Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pobiner, B., Watson, W.A., Beardsley, P.M., Bertka, C.M. (2019). Using Human Examples to Teach Evolution to High School Students: Increasing Understanding and Decreasing Cognitive Biases and Misconceptions. In: Harms, U., Reiss, M. (eds) Evolution Education Re-considered. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14697-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14698-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)