Abstract
Before coming to the conclusion of this book, this chapter summarises the findings of the previous analysis by illustrating the central claims in a comparison of the European dimension of metropolitan policies across contexts and levels. Thereby, the comparison develops around three tendencies identified in the previous chapters, or in other words, is based on the claim that the European dimension of metropolitan policies is an expression of the following three interrelated processes. First, selected metropolitan regions, including Lyon and Stuttgart, are increasingly oriented towards the European level, engaging in activities that underline their mobilisation as international actors. In particular, the Chaps. 5 and 7 carve out the European dimension of metropolitan strategies and activities in the EU context, establishing a direct link between the metropolitan and European levels. Second, understandings of ‘the metropolitan’ are shifting, yet not necessarily converging. This tendency becomes visible when comparing the multiplicity of concepts underlying the definition of metropolitan regions in policy documents and practice. While these shifts indicate changing policy frames, the extent to which they correspond to profound paradigmatic shifts remains questionable. Third, references to Europe in national and subnational policies are becoming more normalised, but are largely of symbolic or rhetoric nature—with the exception of EU funding opportunities for metropolitan regions. Meanwhile, the metropolitan remains an implicit policy issue in the EU context and is only addressed indirectly, embedded in a soft approach to ‘cities of all sizes’ and functional regions. In order to expound how these processes contribute to the appearance of a European dimension in metropolitan policies, the first two subchapters contrast metropolitan policies at the same scale from a more traditional comparative perspective which assumes that policies at the same governmental level are comparable. The remainder of the chapter engages in an interpretive comparison across levels guided by the theoretically informed research questions. This then builds the basis for the subsequent interpretation of the case studies in light of the theoretical assumptions on the Europeanisation, learning and reframing of metropolitan policies.
In parts, this chapter builds on Fricke (2017) comparing metropolitan policies in France, Germany and the EU context across levels regarding the change of metropolitan concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alemann Uv, Münch C (2006) Europafähigkeit der Kommunen: Die lokale Ebene in der Europäischen Union, 1st edn. VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Balme R, Le Galès P (1997) Stars and black holes: French regions and cities in the European Galaxy. In: Goldsmith MJF, Klausen KK (eds) European integration and local government. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 146–171
Baudelle G, Peyrony J (2005) Le polycentrisme en France: cheminement d’un concept. Territoires 2030(1):89–101
Beal V, Pinson G (2014) When mayors go global: international strategies, urban governance and leadership. Int J Urban Reg Res 38:302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12018
Berg Lvd, Klink Av, Meer Jvd (2004) Survey of metropolitan government in Europe. In: Phares D (ed) Metropolitan governance without metropolitan government?. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, England, Burlington, VT, pp 79–102
Brenner N (2004) New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2010) Metropolräume in Europa. Analysen Bau, Stadt, Raum, Bonn
d’Albergo E, Lefèvre C (2007) Why cities are looking abroad and how they go about it. Environ Plan C 25:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1068/c2503ed
Denters B, Mossberger K (2006) Building blocks for a methodology for comparative urban political research. Urban Affairs Rev 41:550–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087405282607
Diez T (2001) Speaking ‘Europe’: the politics of integration discourse. In: Christiansen T, Jørgensen KE, Wiener A (eds) The social construction of Europe. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, pp 85–100
Diller C (2014) Bundesländerübergreifende Metropolregionen: Neugliederung oder verstärkte Zusammenarbeit der Bundesländer? Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 475–487
Dühr S, Lagendijk A (2007) The performance of spatial concepts in regional-level planning policy text and maps in the Netherlands, Lisbon
Dunlop CA (2009) Policy transfer as learning: capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Stud 30:289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442870902863869
ESPON (2007) Project 1.4.3: study on urban functions. Final report, Luxembourg
Fricke C (2017) Metropolitan regions as a changing policy concept in a comparative perspective. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 75:291–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0450-3
Gualini E (2004) Multi-level governance and institutional change: the Europeanization of regional policy in Italy. Ashgate, Aldershot
Hall PA (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comp Polit 25:275–296
Heiden Nvd (2010) Urban foreign policy and domestic dilemmas: insights from Swiss and EU city-regions. ECPR Press monographs. ECPR Press, Colchester
Hoffmann-Martinot V (2006) Reform and modernization of urban government in France. In: Hoffmann-Martinot V, Wollmann H (eds) State and local government reforms in France and Germany: divergence and convergence, 1st edn. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 231–251
Kübler D (2003) “Metropolitan Governance” oder: Die unendliche Geschichte der Institutionenbildung in Stadtregionen. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 535–541
Kübler D (2012) Die Transformation der Demokratie in europäischen Metropolregionen. In: Egner B, Haus M, Terizakis G (eds) Regieren: Festschrift für Hubert Heinelt. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 331–344
Lacour C, Delamarre A, Thoin M (2008) 40 ans d’aménagement du territoire, 4ieme édition actualisée. Territoires en mouvement, La Documentation française, Paris
Le Galès P (2002) European Cities. Oxford University Press
Radaelli CM (2003) The Europeanization of public policy. In: Featherstone K, Radaelli CM (eds) The politics of Europeanization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 27–56
Radaelli CM, Dunlop CA (2013) Learning in the European Union: theoretical lenses and meta-theory. J Eur Public Policy 20:923–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781832
Rein M, Schön D (1993) Reframing policy discourse. In: Fischer F, Forester J (eds) The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C., pp 145–166
Salet WGM (2007) New metropolitan spaces and metropolitan strategies in the face of modernisation. Métropoles
Scholles F (2009) Vergleich der Raumplanung und Regionalentwicklung in Deutschland und Frankreich. In: Güldenberg E, Preising T, Scholles F (eds) Europäische Raumentwicklung: Metropolen und periphere Regionen. Lang, Frankfurt, M., Berlin, Bern, Bruxelles, New York, NY, Oxford, Wien, pp 131–140
Waterhout B, Othengrafen F, Sykes O (2013) Neo-liberalization processes and spatial planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: an exploration. Plan Pract Res 28:141–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.699261
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fricke, C. (2020). Comparing the European Dimension of Metropolitan Policies from an Interpretive Perspective. In: European Dimension of Metropolitan Policies. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14614-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14614-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14613-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14614-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)