Advertisement

Metropolitan Policies of the European Union

  • Carola FrickeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Geography book series (SPRINGERGEOGR)

Abstract

The main topic of this chapter is to understand the role of metropolitan issues in EU policies and thereby to situate metropolitan regions in the European multilevel polity from a supranational point of view. In this chapter on the European context, the overall research question concerning the European dimension of metropolitan policies is reversed into exploring the extent to which we can find a metropolitan dimension in European policies.

Keywords

Supranational context Functional urban areas METREX ESPON 

References

  1. Alden J (2006) Regional development and spatial planning. In: Adams N, Alden J, Harris N (eds) Regional development and spatial planning in an enlarged European Union. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 17–40Google Scholar
  2. Artmann J, Huttenloher C, Kawka R, Scholze J (2012) Partnership for sustainable rural-urban development: existing evidences. n° 2011.CE.16.0.AT.017Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson R (2001) The emerging ‘urban agenda’ and the European spatial development perspective: towards an EU urban policy? Eur Plan Stud 9:385–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bache I (2006) The politics of redistribution. In: Jørgensen KE, Pollack MA, Rosamond B (eds) Handbook of European Union politics. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, Calif, pp 395–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachtler J, McMaster I (2007) Sustainable growth, competitiveness and employment: will EU cohesion policy deliver on the lisbon strategy? Raumforschung und Raumordnung 65:259–274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03183015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bachtler J, Mendez C (2007) Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the structural funds. JCMS: J Common Mark Stud 45:535–564.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00724.x
  7. Barca F (2009) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy: a place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/barca_en.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
  8. Bengs C, Schmidt-Thomé K (2005) Urban-rural relations in Europe: ESPON 1.1.2. Final reportGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengs C, Zonneveld W (2002) The European discourse on urban-rural relationships: a new policy and research agenda. Built Environment 8:278–289Google Scholar
  10. Benz A, Eberlein B (1999) The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance. J Eur Public Policy 6:329–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bertrand N (2006) Introduction: ESDP ideals and the inheritance of rural planning failures: the key issue of city-region competitiveness. In: Bertrand N, Kreibich V (eds) Europe’s city-regions competitiveness: growth regulation and peri-urban land management. Van Gorcum, Assen, pp 1–18Google Scholar
  12. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (2010) Metropolräume in Europa. Analysen Bau, Stadt, Raum, BonnGoogle Scholar
  13. Chilla T (2012) L’Union Européenne a-t-elle une politique de développement des métropoles?: (Does the European Union have a policy of metropolitan development). bagf 89:558–569.  https://doi.org/10.3406/bagf.2012.8294
  14. Committee of the Regions (2011) Urban governance in the EU: current challenges and future prospects. http://urban-intergroup.eu/wp-content/files_mf/corurbangoverancefinal.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  15. Committee of the Regions (2014) About CoR: key facts. http://cor.europa.eu/en/about/Pages/key-facts.aspx. Accessed 31 May 2014
  16. Committee of the Regions (2014) Opinion: towards an integrated urban agenda for the EU: 107th plenary session, 25–26 June 2014. COTER-V-046, Brussels. http://cor.europa.eu/en/activities/opinions/pages/opinion-factsheet.aspx?OpinionNumber=CDR%206902/2013. Accessed 12 Aug 2017
  17. Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development (2011) Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed at the Informal ministerial meeting of ministers responsible for Spatial and Territorial Development, Gödöllő, Hungary. http://www.eu2011.hu/files/bveu/documents/TA2020.pdf
  18. Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Urban Development (2007b) Territorial Agenda of the European Union: towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed on the occasion of the Informal ministerial meeting on urban development and Territorial Cohesion, Leipzig. http://www.eu-territorial-agenda.eu/Reference%20Documents/Territorial-Agenda-of-the-European-Union-Agreed-on-25-May-2007.pdf
  19. Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Urban Development (2007a) Leipzig Charta on Sustainable European Cities: final draft. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/themes/urban/leipzig_charter.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2014
  20. Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Urban Development, Spanish Presidency (2010) Toledo declaration: informal ministerial meeting on urban developmentGoogle Scholar
  21. Council of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning, European Commission (1999) European spatial development perspective (ESDP): towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European UnionGoogle Scholar
  22. Davies HWE (1994) Towards a European planning system? Planning Practice and Research, 9:63–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459408722911
  23. Deutsch-Österreichisches URBAN Netzwerk, Landeshauptstadt Saarbrücken, URBACT, URBAN 2 Le Résau, European Union (2005) The ‘Acquis URBAN’: using cities’ best practises for European cohesion policy. Common declaration of URBAN cities and players at the European conference ‘URBAN future’. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/newsroom/document/pdf/saarbrucken_urban_en.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2017
  24. Dijkstra L, Poelman H (2012) Cities in Europe: the new OECD-EC definitions. Regional focusGoogle Scholar
  25. Dühr S, Stead D, Zonneveld W (2007) The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation. Plan Pract Res 22:291–307.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. ESPON (2006) ESPON 1.1.1: Potentials for polycentric development in Europe, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  27. ESPON (2007) Project 1.4.3: study on urban functions. Final report, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  28. ESPON (2012) Best metropolises: best development conditions in European metropolises: Paris, Berlin and WarsawGoogle Scholar
  29. EUROCITIES (2013) Eurocities: about us. http://www.eurocities.eu/eurocities/about_us. Accessed 8 June 2015
  30. European Commission (2008) Green paper on territorial cohesion: turning territorial diversity into strength. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0616:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 6 June 2014
  31. European Commission (2012) Defining urban areas in Europe: three levels of urban areas based on population distributuion and commuting. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/4313761/4311719/Metro_reg_Defining_urban_areas. Accessed 29 June 15
  32. European Commission DGfRP (2009) Metropolitan regions in the EU. Regional focusGoogle Scholar
  33. European Commission DGfRP (2011a) Cities of tomorrow: challenges, visions, ways forward. Luxembourg, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  34. European Commission DGfRP (2011b) Regional typologies: a compilation. Regional focusGoogle Scholar
  35. European Commission DGfRP (2013) Inception report (revised version): Study on promoting multi-level governance in support of Europe 2020Google Scholar
  36. European Commission DGfRP, AEIDL (2013) 50 Good practices in urban development: supported by the European Regional Development Fund during the 2007–2013 programming period, BruxellesGoogle Scholar
  37. European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy (2008) Fostering the urban dimension: analysis of the operational programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007–2013). Working Document of the Directorate-General for Regional Policy, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  38. European Commission, Inter-Service Group on Urban Development (2010) The urban dimension in European Union policies 2010: introduction and Part 1, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index_en.htm
  39. European Economic and Social Committee (2004) Opinion on European metropolitan areas: socio-economic implications for Europe’s future (2004/C 302/20)Google Scholar
  40. European Economic and Social Committee (2007) Opinion on European metropolitan areas: Socio-economic implications for Europe’s future (2007/C 168/02); ECO/188. http://www.eesc.europa.eu/?i=portal.en.eco-opinions.14236. Accessed 3 March 2015
  41. European Economic and Social Committee (2011) Opinion on ‘Metropolitan areas and city regions in Europe 2020’: own-initiative opinion (2011/C 376/02)Google Scholar
  42. European Metropolitan Authorities, Città metropolitana di Torino (2016) Towards a common European metropolitan agenda: Forum. http://www.cittametropolitana.torino.it/speciali/2016/ema/forum.shtml. Accessed 2 July 2017
  43. European Parliament and Council (2006) Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006 on the European Regional Development Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1783/1999: REG (EC) 1080/2006Google Scholar
  44. European Parliament and Council (2013) Regulation (EC) No 1303/2013 on the common provisions of the European Regional Development Fund […] repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006: REG (EC) 1303/2013Google Scholar
  45. European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2008) Report on the follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: towards a European action programme for spatial development and territorial cohesion (2007/2190(INI)): session document. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+REPORT+A6-2008-0028+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN. Accessed 4 June 2014
  46. European Parliament, Committee on Regional Development (2011) Report on European urban agenda and its future in cohesion policy (2010/2158(INI)): Plenary sittingGoogle Scholar
  47. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B: Structural and Cohesion Policies, Regional Development (2014) The role of cities in cohesion policy 2014–2020Google Scholar
  48. European Parliament, Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policy (2007) Follow-up of the Territorial Agenda and the Leipzig Charter: towards a European Action Programme for spatial development and territorial cohesion: Ad-hoc note, Brussels. www.eukn.org/dsresource?objectid=147962. Accessed 4 June 2014
  49. European Parliament, URBAN Intergroup, METREX, PURPLE, EUROCITIES (2011) Efficient metropolitan governance. Functioning urban-rural relationsGoogle Scholar
  50. Eurostat, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (2012) Territorial typologies for European cities and metropolitan regions: Map 2: Typology of metro regions, 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/8/8d/Typology_of_metro_regions%2C_2012_%281%29.png. Accessed 14 September 2017
  51. Faludi A (2010) Cohesion, coherence, co-operation: European spatial planning coming of age? RTPI library series. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Faludi A (ed) (2002) European spatial planning. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  53. Faludi A (ed) (2008) European spatial research and planning. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  54. Faludi A, Waterhout B (2002) The making of the European spatial development perspective: no masterplan. Routledge, London [u.a.]Google Scholar
  55. Fedeli V (2015) EU urban agenda: an open and complex debate. disP Plan Rev 50:71–77.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2014.1007661
  56. Forum of Federations, Committee of the Regions (2011) Governance of metropolitan regions: European and global experiences. Workshop on the “Governance of Metropolitan Regions in Federal Systems”, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  57. Frank S (2006) Aufeinander zugehen: Die Europäische Union und die europäischen Städte. In: Kleger H, Lomsky A, Weigt F (eds) Von der Agglomeration zur Städteregion: Neue politische Denk- und Kooperationsräume. Lit, Berlin, pp 31–59Google Scholar
  58. Fricke C (2018) Metropolitan regions as new scales and evolving policy concepts in the European Union’s policy context. In: Oosterlynck S, Beeckmans L, Bassens D, Derudder B, Segaert B, Braeckmans L (eds) The city as a global political actor. Routledge, London, New York, pp 168–186Google Scholar
  59. Geppert A, Colini L (2016) The EU urban agenda: why, how and for whom? disP Plan Rev 51:93–96.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2015.1134971
  60. Gløersen E (2007) Towards an improved understanding of urban profiles and polycentric development potentials: reflections on ESPON 1.1.1. In: Cattan N (ed) Cities and networks in Europe: a critical approach of polycentrism. J. Libbey eurotext, Montrouge, pp 27–37Google Scholar
  61. Göddecke-Stellmann J, Porsche L, Schmidt-Seiwert V (2005) Den Blick schärfen: Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme des Konzepts funktionaler Stadtregionen im ESPON-Programm. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 457–464Google Scholar
  62. Healey P (2004) The treatment of space and place in the new strategic spatial planning in Europe. Int J Urban Reg Res 28:45–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hix S, Høyland B (2011) The political system of the European Union, 3rd edn. The European Union series, Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Territorial Cohesion and Urban Matters (2015) Declaration of ministers towards the EU urban agenda: Riga Declaration, Amsterdam. Accessed 22 June 2017Google Scholar
  65. Informal Meeting of EU Ministers Responsible for Urban Matters (2016) Urban agenda for the EU: pact of Amsterdam. Agreed at the informal meeting of EU ministers responsible for urban matters on 30 May 2016 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam. Accessed 22 June 2017Google Scholar
  66. Jørgensen KE (1999) The social construction of the Acquis Communautaire: a cornerstone of the European Edifice. Eur Integr Online Pap (EIoP) 3:1–17Google Scholar
  67. Katz B, Bradley J (2013) The metropolitan revolution: how cities and metros are fixing our broken politics and fragile economy, First, paperback edn. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  68. Krukowska J, Lackowska M (2017) Metropolitan colours of Europeanization. Institutionalization of integrated territorial investment structures in the context of past cooperation in metropolitan regions. Raumforschung und Raumordnung 75:275–289.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0447-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Kunzmann KR (2006) Spatial development and territorial cohesion in Europe. In: Altrock U et al (eds) Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states: from adjustment to reinvention. Ashgate, Aldershot, England, Burlington, VT, pp 19–30Google Scholar
  70. METREX (2014) About METREX. http://www.eurometrex.org/ENT1/EN/About/about_METREX.php. Accessed 31 May 2014
  71. METREX (ed) (2013) The metropolitan dimension to European affairs: companion to the METREX 2013 Glasgow conferenceGoogle Scholar
  72. Ministry of Interior and Kingdom Relations, The Netherlands (2005) Ministerial meeting urban policy ‘Cities Empower Europe’: conclusions Dutch Presidency 2004, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  73. Nugent N (2017) The government and politics of the European Union, 8th edn. The European Union series texts, Palgrave Macmillan Education, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. OECD (2013) Rural-urban partnerships: an integrated approach to economic development. OECD rural policy reviewsGoogle Scholar
  75. OECD (2015) The metropolitan century: understanding urbanisation and its consequences, ParisGoogle Scholar
  76. Pagano G, Losco S (2016) EU cohesion-policies and metropolitan areas. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 223:422–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Parkinson M (2005) Urban policy in Europe—where have we been and where are we going? In: Antalovsky E, Dangschat JS, Parkinson M (eds) Cities in Europe—Europe in the cities: European metropolitan governance. Liverpool, Vienna, pp 17–67Google Scholar
  78. Piskorz W (2011) Speaking points. In: Efficient metropolitan governance. Functioning urban-rural relations, pp 17–19Google Scholar
  79. Reiter R (2008) The “European City” in the European Union: comparing the implementation conditions for the EUs urban development agenda in Germany and France. In: Atkinson R, Rossignolo C (eds) The re-creation of the European City: governance, territory and polycentricity; [brings together some revised versions of papers presented at a EURA conference on cities in city regions held in Warsaw in May 2006]. Techne Press, Amsterdam, pp 17–38Google Scholar
  80. Richardson T, Jensen OB (2000) Discourses of mobility and polycentric development: a contested view of European spatial planning. Discourses of mobility and polycentric development: a contested view of European spatial planning. Eur Plan Stud 8:503–520.  https://doi.org/10.1080/713666421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tofarides M (2003) Urban policy in the European Union: a multi-level gatekeeper system. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, England, Burlington, VTGoogle Scholar
  82. Tosics I (2017) Integrated territorial investment: a missed opportunity? In: Bachtler J, Berkowitz P, Hardy S (eds) EU cohesion policy: reassessing performance and direction. Routledge, New York, pp 284–296Google Scholar
  83. URBAN Intergroup (2015) About us. http://urban-intergroup.eu/about-us/. Accessed 6 Feb 2015
  84. Wallace H, Pollack MA, Young AR (eds) (2010) Policy-making in the European Union, 6th edn. New European Union series. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Wiechmann T (2009) Raumpolitische Diskurse um Metropolregionen in Europa - Eine Spurensuche. In: Knieling J (ed) Metropolregionen: Innovation, Wettbewerb, Handlungsfähigkeit. Verlag der ARL; ARL, Hannover, pp 101–132Google Scholar
  86. Williams RH (1996) European Union spatial policy and planning. Paul Chapman Pub, LondonGoogle Scholar
  87. Zimmermann K (2008) “Cities for growth, jobs and cohesion”. Die implizite Stadtpolitik der EU. In: Heinelt H, Vetter A (eds) Lokale Politikforschung heute. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 79–102Google Scholar
  88. Zimmermann K (2012) Institutionalisierung regionaler Kooperation als kollektiver Lernprozess?: Das Beispiel Metropolregion Rhein-Neckar, 1. Auflage. Modernes Regieren, Band 9. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  89. Zimmermann K, Heinelt H (2012) Metropolitan Governance in Deutschland: Regieren in Ballungsräumen und neue Formen politischer Steuerung. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zonneveld W (ed) (2012) European territorial governance. Delft Univ. Press, DelftGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human GeographyUniversity of FreiburgFreiburg im BreisgauGermany

Personalised recommendations