Skip to main content

Citizen Science: An Opportunity for Learning in the Networked Society

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning In a Networked Society

Abstract

Seeking to promote science communication, civic engagement, and informal education, citizen science is a genre of research that connects scientists and non-scientists around projects involving science. This meeting point creates opportunities for potential benefits to both sides. Scientists may advance their research and obtain prestigious funding while non-scientists stand to gain enjoyment, new skills, and knowledge. To learn more how these inspiring outcomes can be promoted, we conceptualize citizen science and its myriad stakeholders as an ecology. We complement this metaphor with the term mutualism to express our desire for interactions in which all parties benefit from their involvement and propose a Mutualistic Ecology of Citizen Science (MECS) as an analytic framework that can potentially contribute to the design and conceptualization of learning in citizen science projects. In this chapter, we operationalize this framework, using four lenses that span several disciplines to look at potential benefits to different participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/CurrentProjects/DBASSE_178572

References

  • Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akkerman, S., & Bruining, T. (2016). Multi-level boundary crossing in a professional development school partnership. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andújar, B., Campderrós, G., García, M., Marino, M., Mas, M., et al. (2015). Twenty tips for high-school students engaging in research with scientists. Frontiers for Young Minds, 3, 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristeidou, M., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2013). A design-based study of citizen inquiry for geology. In Proceedings of the doctoral consortium at the European conference on technology enhanced learning, co-located with the EC-TEL 2013 conference 7–13. CEUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atias, O., Sagy, O., Kali, Y., Angel, D., & Edelist, D., (2017). Jellyfish and people—a citizen-science collaboration with mutual benefits to citizens and scientists. Poster presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, San Antonio, Texas, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 462–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, H. L., Dixon, C. G., & Harris, E. M. (2017). Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49(4), 193–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mertl, V., & Yassine, M. (2016). Citizen science: Connecting to nature through networks. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education (Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series) (Vol. 16, pp. 257–284). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zvi, D., Gravemeijer, K., & Ainley, J. (2018). Design of statistics learning environments. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 473–502). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielaczyc, K., Kapur, M., & Collins, A. (2013). In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. M. O’Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizer, C. (2009). The emerging web of linked data. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(5), 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report, (July), 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C., & Ballard, H. (2016). The theory and practice of citizen science: Launching a new journal. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., et al. (2009). Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. Bioscience, 59(11), 977–984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Phillips, T., Enck, J., Shirk, J., & Trautmann, N. (2014). Citizen Science and Youth Education. Washington, DC: Research Council Committee on Out-of-School Time STEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Phillips, T. B., Ballard, H. L., & Enck, J. W. (2015). Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronstein, J. L. (1994). Our current understanding of mutualism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 69(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucchi, M., & Trench, B. (2014). Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Abingdon, UK/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 357–387). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bybee, R., McCrae, B., & Laurie, R. (2009). PISA 2006: An assessment of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 865–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. B., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Two meanings of citizen science. In D. Cavalier & E. B. Kennedy (Eds.), The rightful place of science: Citizen science (pp. 51–62). Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crall, A. W., Jordan, R., Holfelder, K., Newman, G. J., Graham, J., & Waller, D. M. (2012). The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, V. (2015). Online citizen science projects: An exploration of motivation, contribution and participation. Ph.D. dissertation submitted to the Open University (United Kingdom).

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Savio, L., Prainsack, B., & Buyx, A. (2016). Crowdsourcing the human gut. Is crowdsourcing also “citizen science”? Journal of Science Communication, 15(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., et al. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 291–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2018). The role of model comparison in young learners’ reasoning with statistical models and modeling. ZDM – International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(7), 1183–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, D. C., Kirn, S. L., & workshop participants. (2018). Designing citizen science for both science and education: A workshop report. (Technical Report No. 2018–01). Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS Science Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C., Abrams, E., Reitsma, R., Roux, K., Salmonsen, L., & Marra, P. P. (2005). The neighborhood nestwatch program: Participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flávio S. Azevedo. (2013). The Tailored Practice of Hobbies and Its Implication for the Design of Interest-Driven Learning Environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences 22(3), 462–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (1994, September). Assessment of interpretive skills. Summary of working group, Conference on Assessment Issues in Statistics Education. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, M. A., Willett, K. W., Fortson, L. F., Cardamone, C. N., Schawinski, K., Cheung, E., et al. (2015). Galaxy zoo: The effect of bar-driven fuelling on the presence of an active galactic nucleus in disc galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448(4), 3442–3454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching practice. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y. N. (2015). What makes citizen science projects successful, and what can we learn from them for future projects? THE Technion literature review of citizen science projects. Technion Citizen Science Project (TCSP). Haifa, Israel: The Technion—Israel Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Fishbain, B. (2016). Increased knowledge and scientific thinking following participation of school students in air-quality research. In Proceedings of Indoor Air 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Fishbain, B. (2017). Why and how should we facilitate scientific information to the public [in Hebrew]. Ecology and the Environment, 8(3), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y. N., Orr, D., Baram-Tsabari, A., & Fishbain, B. (2017). Between vision and reality: A case study of scientists’ views on citizen science. Citizen Science Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y. N., Fishbain, B., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (Forthcoming). User centered design of a citizen science air-quality monitoring project. International Journal of Science Education, Part B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information—overview and typology of participation. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice (pp. 105–122). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, J., Hoerl, R., Horton, N. J., Nolan, D., Baumer, B., Hall-Holt, O., et al. (2015). Data science in statistics curricula: Preparing students to “think with data”. The American Statistician, 69(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haywood, B. K., & Besley, J. C. (2014). Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement: Towards integrated indicators of successful program outcomes in participatory science. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 23(1), 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science. A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, C., Østerlund, C., Maidel, V., Crowston, K., & Mugar, G. (2016). Which way did they go? Newcomer movement through the Zooniverse. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work & social computing (pp. 623–634). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kountoupes, D. I., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2008). Citizen science and youth audiences: Educational outcomes of the Monarch Larva Monitoring Project. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 1(1). http://jces.ua.edu/citizen-science-and-youth-audiences-educational-outcomes-of-the-monarch-larva-monitoring-project/

  • Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., & Mun, K. (2014). Planning instruction to meet the intent of the next generation science standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulikowich, J. M., & Young, M. F. (2001). Locating an ecological psychology action for situated methodology. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 10(1–2), 17–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullenberg, C., & Kasperowski, D. (2016). What is citizen science?—A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152

  • Manor, H., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Students’ emergent articulations of models and modeling in making informal statistical inferences. In Proceedings of the ninth international research forum on statistical reasoning, thinking, and literacy (SRTL9) (pp. 107–117). Paderborn, Germany: University of Paderborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manor, H., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2017). Students’ emergent articulations of statistical models and modeling in making informal statistical inferences. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16(2), 116–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., et al. (2017). Citizen science can improve conservation science, natural resource management, and environmental protection. Biological Conservation, 208, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein, B. (2016). Can we understand citizen science? Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. (2010). Social media and the production of knowledge: A return to little science? Social Epistemology, 24(3), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. P., Tippins, D., & Bryan, L. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettibone, L., Vohland, K., Bonn, A., Richter, A., Bauhus, W., Behrisch, B., Borcherding, R., Brandt, M., Bry, F., Dörler, D., Elbertse, I., Glöckler, F., Göbel, C., Hecker, S., Heigl, F., Herdick, M., Kiefer, S., Kluttig, T., Kühn, E., Kühn, K., Oswald, K., Röller, O., Schefels, C., Schierenberg, A., Scholz, W., Schumann, A., Sieber, A., Smolarski, R., Tochtermann, K., Wende, W. and Ziegler, D. 2016. Citizen science for all – a guide for citizen science practitioners

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Allen, A. R., Coburn, C. E., & Farrell. (2015). Conceptualizing research-practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 20(1–2), 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D., Johnston-Wilder, P., Ainley, J., & Mason, J. (2008). Local and global thinking in statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Carney, K., Gyuk, G., Borne, K., Wallin, J., & Jacoby, S. (2009). Citizen science: Status and research directions for the coming decade. Astro2010: The astronomy and astrophysics decadal survey, Position Paper no. 46. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009astro2010P..46R

  • Redondo, M. L., Queiruga Dios, M. A., Sáiz Manzanares, M. C., & Juez Navarro, S. (2018). Citizen science in school. In M. F. P. C. Martins Costa, J. B. Vásquez Dorrío, & J. M. Fernández Novell (Eds.), Hands-on science. Advancing science. Improving education. (pp. 194–198). Hands-on Science Network. Braga, Portugal: Copissaurio Repro – Centro Imp. Unip. Lda. Campus de Gualtar, Reprografia Complexo II. http://www.hsci.info/hsci2018/images/pdfs/eBookHSCI2018.pdf

  • Reiser, B. J. (2013, September). What professional development strategies are needed for successful implementation of the next generation science standards. In paper written for the Invitational research symposium on science assessment (Vol. 24, p. 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 545–558). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romine, W. L., Sadler, T. D., & Kinslow, A. T. (2016). Assessment of scientific literacy: M. F. P. C. (QuASSR). Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(2), 274–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D. (2011). Situating socio-scientific issues in classrooms as a means of achieving goals of science education. In Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 1–9). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Romine, W. L., & Topçu, M. S. (2016). Learning science content through socio-scientific issues-based instruction: A multi-level assessment study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(10), 1622–1635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socio-scientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickler, J., & Cherry, T. M. (2012). Lost ladybug project summative evaluation report. Edgewater, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, C., Monteiro, A. J., Manahl, C., Lostal, E., Schäfer, T., Andrade, N., et al. (2016). Cell spotting: Educational and motivational outcomes of cell biology citizen science project in the classroom. Journal of Science Communication, 15(01), A02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, R. A. (1997). Serious leisure and well-being. In J. T. Haworth (Ed.), Work, leisure and well-being (pp. 117–130). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., et al. (2014). The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169, 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, B. L., Phillips, T., Dayer, A. A., Wood, C. L., Farnsworth, A., Iliff, M. J., et al. (2017). Using open access observational data for conservation action: A case study for birds. Biological Conservation, 208, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teacher, A. G. F., Griffiths, D. J., Hodgson, D. J., & Inger, R. (2013). Smartphones in ecology and evolution: A guide for the apprehensive. Ecology and Evolution, 3(16), 5268–5278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench, B. (2008). Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In D. Cheng, M. Claessens, N. R. J. Gascoigne, T. J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, & S. Shi (Eds.), Communicating science in social contexts: new models, new practices (pp. 119–138). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical thinking using the media. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization Articles, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilderman, C. C. (2004). Shermans Creek: A portrait. Technical Status Report. Carlisle, PA: Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring (ALLARM). Dickinson College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoho, R. A., & Vanmali, B. H. (2016). Controversy in biology classrooms—citizen science approaches to evolution and applications to climate change discussions. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education, 17(1), 110–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler, D. (2015). Socioscientific issues. In Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 998–1003). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sagy, O. et al. (2019). Citizen Science: An Opportunity for Learning in the Networked Society. In: Kali, Y., Baram-Tsabari, A., Schejter, A.M. (eds) Learning In a Networked Society. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14610-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14610-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14609-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14610-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics