Bioenergy Crops: Recent Advances and Future Outlook

  • Pramendra Yadav
  • Priyanka Priyanka
  • Dileep Kumar
  • Anurag Yadav
  • Kusum YadavEmail author
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 10)


Fossil fuels have solved our energy problems since the beginning of the industrial revolution that started in the eighteenth century. However, from past few decades, the world has seen an unprecedented and uncontrolled use of fossil fuels. In the current era, we heavily rely on fossil fuels for energy demands. It is undeniably true that fossil fuels hold the credit of shaping our world, but on the cost of environmental and related hazards. The negative environmental impacts of fossil usage are now being realized, and the search for alternative energy sources has begun. Bioenergy crops are one such energy source that could positively impact the environment to reduce the level of carbon dioxide, emission of greenhouse gases and soil erosion. The biofuel generation using fast growing and photosynthetically efficient bioenergy crops is emerging as a reliable alternative to fossil fuels. Bioenergy plants increase soil carbon and fix atmospheric carbon. In addition, bioenergy crops (miscanthus, sorghum and poplar) could also be used for the phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils. The bioenergy crops include specific plants that are grown and maintained at lower costs for biofuel production. The bioenergy crops are classified into five types namely, first-, second- and third-generation bioenergy crops, dedicated energy crops and halophytes. The first-generation bioenergy crops include corn, sorghum, rapeseed and sugarcane, whereas the second-generation bioenergy crops are comprised of switchgrass, miscanthus, alfalfa, reed canary grass, Napier grass and other plants. The third-generation bioenergy crops contain boreal plants, crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants, eucalyptus and microalgae. Bioenergy halophytes are comprised of the genera Acacia, Eucalyptus, Casuarina, Melaleuca, Prosopis, Rhizophora and Tamarix. The dedicated energy crops include perennial herbaceous and woody plant species as giant miscanthus, switchgrass, jatropha and algae.


Bioenergy crops Global climate change Greenhouse gases Phytoremediation 


  1. Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17:675–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad A, Yasin NM, Derek C, Lim J (2011) Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15:584–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Chami Z, Amer N, Al Bitar L, Cavoski I (2015) Potential use of Sorghum bicolor and Carthamus tinctorius in phytoremediation of nickel, lead and zinc. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:3957–3970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baenziger P, Russell W, Graef G, Campbell B (2006) Improving lives. Crop Sci 46:2230–2244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai H, Euring D, Volmer K, Janz D, Polle A (2013) The nitrate transporter (NRT) gene family in poplar. PLoS ONE 8:e72126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barbosa B, Boléo S, Sidella S, Costa J, Duarte MP, Mendes B, Cosentino SL, Fernando AL (2015) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils using the perennial energy crops Miscanthus spp. and Arundo donax L. BioEnergy Res 8:1500–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berg Å (2002) Breeding birds in short-rotation coppices on farmland in central Sweden—the importance of Salix height and adjacent habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boe A, Beck DL (2008) Yield components of biomass in switchgrass. Crop Sci 48:1306–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boe A, Lee D (2007) Genetic variation for biomass production in prairie cordgrass and switchgrass. Crop Sci 47:929–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boehmel C, Lewandowski I, Claupein W (2008) Comparing annual and perennial energy cropping systems with different management intensities. Agric Syst 96:224–236Google Scholar
  11. Börjesson P (1999) Environmental effects of energy crop cultivation in Sweden—I: identification and quantification. Biomass Bioenergy 16:137–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borland AM, Griffiths H, Hartwell J, Smith JAC (2009) Exploiting the potential of plants with crassulacean acid metabolism for bioenergy production on marginal lands. J Exp Bot 60:2879–2896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bouton JH (2007) Molecular breeding of switchgrass for use as a biofuel crop. Curr Opin Genet Dev 17:553–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bush DR, Leach JE (2007) Translational genomics for bioenergy production: there’s room for more than one model. Plant Cell 19:2971–2973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carere CR, Sparling R, Cicek N, Levin DB (2008) Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int J Mol Sci 9:1342–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carroll A, Somerville C (2009) Cellulosic biofuels. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:165–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Casler MD, Stendal CA, Kapich L, Vogel KP (2007) Genetic diversity, plant adaptation regions, and gene pools for switchgrass. Crop Sci 47:2261–2273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cassaniti C, Romano D, Hop M, Flowers T (2013) Growing floricultural crops with brackish water. Environ Exper Bot 92:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chhetri A, Tango M, Budge S, Watts K, Islam M (2008) Non-edible plant oils as new sources for biodiesel production. Int J Mol Sci 9:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cibin R, Trybula E, Chaubey I, Brouder SM, Volenec JJ (2016) Watershed-scale impacts of bioenergy crops on hydrology and water quality using improved SWAT model. Gcb Bioenergy 8:837–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delong M, Swanberg D, Oelke E (1995) Sustainable biomass energy production and rural economic development using alfalfa as feedstock. National Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO (United States)Google Scholar
  22. Dipti, Priyanka (2013) Bioenergy crops an alternative energy. Int J Environ Eng Manag 4:265–272Google Scholar
  23. Ehrlich PR, Pringle RM (2008) Where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:11579–11586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenbies MH, Vance ED, Aust WM, Seiler JR (2009) Intensive utilization of harvest residues in southern pine plantations: quantities available and implications for nutrient budgets and sustainable site productivity. Bioenergy Res 2:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EPA (1999) Phytoremediation resource guide. Environmental Protection Agency EPA 542-B-99-003Google Scholar
  26. Escamilla-Treviño LL (2012) Potential of plants from the genus Agave as bioenergy crops. Bioenergy Res 5:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng Q, Chaubey I, Her YG, Cibin R, Engel B, Volenec J, Wang X (2015) Hydrologic and water quality impacts and biomass production potential on marginal land. Environ Model Softw 72:230–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fernando AL, Duarte MP, Almeida J, Boléo S, Mendes B (2010) Environmental impact assessment of energy crops cultivation in Europe. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefin 4:594–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ferré C, Leip A, Matteucci G, Previtali F, Seufert G (2005) Impact of 40 years poplar cultivation on soil carbon stocks and greenhouse gas fluxes. Biogeosci Discuss 2:897–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Finckh MR (2008) Integration of breeding and technology into diversification strategies for disease control in modern agriculture. In: Sustainable disease management in a European context. Springer, pp 399–409Google Scholar
  31. Flowers TJ, Colmer TD (2008) Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytol 179:945–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fraiture Cd, Giordano M, Liao Y (2008) Biofuels and implications for agricultural water use: blue impacts of green energy. Water Policy 10:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fritioff Å, Greger M (2003) Aquatic and terrestrial plant species with potential to remove heavy metals from stormwater. Int J Phytoremed 5:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Glenn EP, Brown JJ, Blumwald E (1999) Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 18:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grammelis P, Malliopoulou A, Basinas P, Danalatos NG (2008) Cultivation and characterization of Cynara cardunculus for solid biofuels production in the Mediterranean region. Int J Mol Sci 9:1241–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grassland F (2011) A searchable catalogue of grass and forage legumes. FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  37. Gressel J (2008) Transgenics are imperative for biofuel crops. Plant Sci 174:246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gresshoff PM, Rangan L, Indrasumunar A, Scott PT (2017) A new bioenergy crop based on oil-rich seeds from the legume tree Pongamia pinnata. Energy Emission Control Technol 5:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harris K, Subudhi P, Borrell A, Jordan D, Rosenow D, Nguyen H, Klein P, Klein R, Mullet J (2006) Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 58:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam M, Bhowmik PC, Hossain M, Rahman MM, Prasad MNV, Ozturk M, Fujita M (2014) Potential use of halophytes to remediate saline soils. Biomed Res Int 2014:1–12Google Scholar
  41. Hastilestari BR, Mudersbach M, Tomala F, Vogt H, Biskupek-Korell B, Van Damme P, Guretzki S, Papenbrock J (2013) Euphorbia tirucalli L.–comprehensive characterization of a drought tolerant plant with a potential as biofuel source. PLoS One 8:e63501Google Scholar
  42. Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP (2004) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenergy 27:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heaton EA, Dohleman FG, Miguez AF, Juvik JA, Lozovaya V, Widholm J, Zabotina OA, McIsaac GF, David MB, Voigt TB (2010) Miscanthus: a promising biomass crop. In: Advances in botanical research, vol 56. Elsevier, pp 75–137Google Scholar
  44. Hoque YM, Raj C, Hantush MM, Chaubey I, Govindaraju RS (2014) How do land-use and climate change affect watershed health? A scenario-based analysis. Water Qual Expo Health 6:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jakob K, Zhou F, Paterson AH (2009) Genetic improvement of C4 grasses as cellulosic biofuel feedstocks. Vitro Cellular Develop Biol Plant 45:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jaradat AA (2010) Genetic resources of energy crops: biological systems to combat climate change. Aust J Crop Sci 4:309–323Google Scholar
  47. Jones GA, Sieving KE (2006) Intercropping sunflower in organic vegetables to augment bird predators of arthropods. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:171–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Karp A, Hanley SJ, Trybush SO, Macalpine W, Pei M, Shield I (2011) Genetic improvement of willow for bioenergy and biofuels free access. J Integr Plant Biol 53:151–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Karp A, Shield I (2008) Bioenergy from plants and the sustainable yield challenge. New Phytol 179:15–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim HK, Parajuli PB, To SF (2013) Assessing impacts of bioenergy crops and climate change on hydrometeorology in the Yazoo River Basin, Mississippi. Agric Meteorol 169:61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kotchoni SO, Gachomo EW (2008) Biofuel production: a promising alternative energy for environmental cleanup and fuelling through renewable resources. J Biol Sci 8:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc B 363:815–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lamb JF, Jung H-JG, Sheaffer CC, Samac DA (2007) Alfalfa leaf protein and stem cell wall polysaccharide yields under hay and biomass management systems. Crop Sci 47:1407–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lamb JF, Sheaffer CC, Samac DA (2003) Population density and harvest maturity effects on leaf and stem yield in alfalfa. Agron J 95:635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Landis DA, Gardiner MM, van der Werf W, Swinton SM (2008) Increasing corn for biofuel production reduces biocontrol services in agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:20552–20557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Leakey AD (2009) Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and the future of C4 crops for food and fuel. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276:2333–2343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lee M (1998) Genome projects and gene pools: new germplasm for plant breeding? Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:2001–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lehtomäki A, Viinikainen T, Rintala J (2008) Screening boreal energy crops and crop residues for methane biofuel production. Biomass Bioenergy 32:541–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lemus R, Lal R (2005) Bioenergy crops and carbon sequestration. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown J, Scurlock J, Huisman W (2000) Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenergy 19:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Long SP, Zhu XG, Naidu SL, Ort DR (2006) Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields? Plant Cell Environ 29:315–330Google Scholar
  63. Lorenz A, Coors J, De Leon N, Wolfrum E, Hames B, Sluiter A, Weimer P (2009) Characterization, genetic variation, and combining ability of maize traits relevant to the production of cellulosic ethanol. Crop Sci 49:85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ma Z, Wood C, Bransby D (2000) Impacts of soil management on root characteristics of switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy 18:105–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mabee W, McFarlane P, Saddler J (2011) Biomass availability for lignocellulosic ethanol production. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4519–4529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Masarovičová E, Kráľová K, Peško M (2009) Energetic plants–cost and benefit. Ecol Chem Eng 16:264–276Google Scholar
  67. McBride AC, Dale VH, Baskaran LM, Downing ME, Eaton LM, Efroymson RA, Garten CT Jr, Kline KL, Jager HI, Mulholland PJ (2011) Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems. Ecol Indic 11:1277–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. McLaughlin SB, Kiniry JR, Taliaferro CM, Ugarte DDLT (2006) Projecting yield and utilization potential of switchgrass as an energy crop. Adv Agron 90:267–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Merigliano MF, Lesica P (1998) The native status of reed canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) in the Inland Northwest. USA Nat Areas J 18:223–230Google Scholar
  70. Miller CA, Gage CL (2011) Potential adverse environmental impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation strategies. In: Global climate change-the technology challenge. Springer, pp 377–415Google Scholar
  71. Mohammed IY, Abakr YA, Kazi FK, Yusup S, Alshareef I, Chin SA (2015) Comprehensive characterization of napier grass as a feedstock for thermochemical conversion. Energies 8:3403–3417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mola-Yudego B, González-Olabarria JR (2010) Mapping the expansion and distribution of willow plantations for bioenergy in Sweden: lessons to be learned about the spread of energy crops. Biomass Bioenergy 34:442–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Monti A, Di Virgilio N, Venturi G (2008) Mineral composition and ash content of six major energy crops. Biomass Bioenergy 32:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Moser BR, Dien BS, Seliskar DM, Gallagher JL (2013) Seashore mallow (Kosteletzkya pentacarpos) as a salt-tolerant feedstock for production of biodiesel and ethanol. Renew Energy 50:833–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. O’Neill GJ, Gordon A (1994) The nitrogen filtering capability of Carolina poplar in an artificial riparian zone. J Environ Qual 23:1218–1223Google Scholar
  76. Oh K, Cao T, Cheng H, Liang X, Hu X, Yan L, Yonemochi S, Takahi S (2015) Phytoremediation potential of sorghum as a biofuel crop and the enhancement effects with microbe inoculation in heavy metal contaminated soil. J Biosci Med 3:9–14Google Scholar
  77. Oh K, Li T, Cheng HY, Hu XF, Lin Q, Xie YH (2013) A primary study on assessment of phytoremediation potential of biofuel crops in heavy metal contaminated soil. In: Applied mechanics and materials. Trans Tech Publications, pp 1135–1138Google Scholar
  78. Okada M, Lanzatella C, Saha MC, Bouton J, Wu R, Tobias CM (2010) Complete switchgrass genetic maps reveal subgenome collinearity, preferential pairing, and multilocus interactions. Genetics 185:745–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Oliver RJ, Finch JW, Taylor G (2009) Second generation bioenergy crops and climate change: a review of the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and drought on water use and the implications for yield. GCB Bioenergy 1:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Ortiz R (2008) Crop genetic engineering under global climate change. Ann Arid Zone 47:343Google Scholar
  81. Paine LK, Peterson TL, Undersander D, Rineer KC, Bartelt GA, Temple SA, Sample DW, Klemme RM (1996) Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production. Biomass Bioenergy 10:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Panta S, Flowers T, Lane P, Doyle R, Haros G, Shabala S (2014) Halophyte agriculture: success stories. Environ Exper Bot 107:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R, Dubchak I, Grimwood J, Gundlach H, Haberer G, Hellsten U, Mitros T, Poliakov A (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Patil V, Tran K-Q, Giselrød HR (2008) Towards sustainable production of biofuels from microalgae. Int J Mol Sci 9:1188–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Petersen J-E (2008) Energy production with agricultural biomass: environmental implications and analytical challenges. Eur Rev Agric Econ 35:385–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Qazi HA, Paranjpe S, Bhargava S (2012) Stem sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum–activity and expression of sucrose metabolizing enzymes and sucrose transporters. J Plant Physiol 169:605–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Rae AM, Street NR, Robinson KM, Harris N, Taylor G (2009) Five QTL hotspots for yield in short rotation coppice bioenergy poplar: the poplar biomass loci. BMC Plant Biol 9:23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ranade SA, Srivastava AP, Rana TS, Srivastava J, Tuli R (2008) Easy assessment of diversity in Jatropha curcas L. plants using two single-primer amplification reaction (SPAR) methods. Biomass Bioenergy 32:533–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rennenberg H, Wildhagen H, Ehlting B (2010) Nitrogen nutrition of poplar trees. Plant Biol 12:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rockwood DL, Rudie AW, Ralph SA, Zhu J, Winandy JE (2008) Energy product options for eucalyptus species grown as short rotation woody crops. Int J Mol Sci 9:1361–1378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rose IV L, Das M, Taliaferro C (2008) Estimation of genetic variability and heritability for biofuel feedstock yield in several populations of switchgrass. Ann Appl Biol 152:11–17Google Scholar
  92. Rubin EM (2008) Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454:841–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Russelle MP (2001) Alfalfa: after an 8,000-year journey, the “Queen of Forages” stands poised to enjoy renewed popularity. Am Sci 89:252–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar NP, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I, Raskin I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for the removal of toxic metals from the environment using plants. Nat Biotechnol 13:468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sanderson MA, Adler PR (2008) Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int J Mol Sci 9:768–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Schenk PM, Thomas-Hall SR, Stephens E, Marx UC, Mussgnug JH, Posten C, Kruse O, Hankamer B (2008) Second generation biofuels: high-efficiency microalgae for biodiesel production. Bioenergy Res 1:20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:464–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sims RE, Hastings A, Schlamadinger B, Taylor G, Smith P (2006) Energy crops: current status and future prospects. Global Change Biol 12:2054–2076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Singh PP (2008) Exploring biodiversity and climate change benefits of community-based forest management. Glob Environ Chang 18:468–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Springer TL, Dewald CL (2004) Eastern gamagrass and other Tripsacum species. In: Warm-season (C4) grasses, pp 955–973Google Scholar
  101. Sticklen M (2006) Plant genetic engineering to improve biomass characteristics for biofuels. Curr Opin Biotech 17:315–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Swaminathan K, Alabady MS, Varala K, De Paoli E, Ho I, Rokhsar DS, Arumuganathan AK, Ming R, Green PJ, Meyers BC (2010) Genomic and small RNA sequencing of Miscanthus giganteus shows the utility of sorghum as a reference genome sequence for Andropogoneae grasses. Genome Biol 11:R12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K (2008) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: a review. Int J Mol Sci 9:1621–1651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tahir MHN, Casler MD, Moore KJ, Brummer EC (2011) Biomass yield and quality of reed canarygrass under five harvest management systems for bioenergy production. Bioenergy Res 4:111–119. Scholar
  105. Takamizawa K, Anderson W, Singh HP (2010) Ethanol from lignocellulosic crops. Industrial Crops and Uses CABI, Oxfordshire, pp 104–139Google Scholar
  106. Taylor G (2008) Bioenergy for heat and electricity in the UK: a research atlas and roadmap. Energy Policy 36:4383–4389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Tharakan P, Robison D, Abrahamson L, Nowak C (2001) Multivariate approach for integrated evaluation of clonal biomass production potential. Biomass Bioenergy 21:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Thomas H, Howarth CJ (2000) Five ways to stay green. J Exp Bot 51:329–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vaněk T, Podlipna R, Soudek P (2010) General factors influencing application of phytotechnology techniques. In: Application of phytotechnologies for cleanup of industrial, agricultural, and wastewater contamination. Springer, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  111. Ventura Y, Eshel A, Pasternak D, Sagi M (2014) The development of halophyte-based agriculture: past and present. Ann Bot 115:529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Villaverde JJ, Li J, Ek M, Ligero P, de Vega A (2009) Native lignin structure of Miscanthus giganteus and its changes during acetic and formic acid fractionation. J Agric Food Chem 57:6262–6270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Villaverde JJ, Ligero P, Vega Ad (2010) Miscanthus giganteus as a source of biobased products through organosolv fractionation: a mini review. Open Agr J 4:102–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Vogel KP, Mitchell RB (2008) Heterosis in switchgrass: biomass yield in swards. Crop Sci 48:2159–2164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Waclawovsky AJ, Sato PM, Lembke CG, Moore PH, Souza GM (2010) Sugarcane for bioenergy production: an assessment of yield and regulation of sucrose content. Plant Biotechnol J 8:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wang S, Hastings A, Smith P (2012) An optimization model for energy crop supply. Gcb Bioenergy 4:88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wang Y, Yan L (2008) CFD studies on biomass thermochemical conversion. Int J Mol Sci 9:1108–1130. Scholar
  118. Williams C, Black I, Biswas T, Heading S (2007) Pathways to prosperity: second generation biomass crops for biofuels using saline lands and wastewater. Agri Sci 21:28–34Google Scholar
  119. Xie X, Zhou F, Zhao Y, Lu X (2008) A summary of ecological and energy-producing effects of perennial energy grasses. Acta Ecol Sin 28:2329–2342Google Scholar
  120. Yasuda M, Ishii Y, Ohta K (2014) Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum Schumach) as raw material for bioethanol production: pretreatment, saccharification, and fermentation. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 19:943–950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Yuan JS, Tiller KH, Al-Ahmad H, Stewart NR, Stewart CN Jr (2008) Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future. Trends Plant Sci 13:421–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Zhao R, Wu X, Bean S, Wang D (2010) Ethanol from grain crops. Industrial crops and uses CABI International; Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 84–101Google Scholar
  123. Zhu K, Chen H, Nan Z (2010) Phytoremediation of loess soil contaminated by organic compounds. In: Application of phytotechnologies for cleanup of industrial, agricultural, and wastewater contamination. Springer, pp 159–176Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pramendra Yadav
    • 1
  • Priyanka Priyanka
    • 1
  • Dileep Kumar
    • 1
  • Anurag Yadav
    • 2
  • Kusum Yadav
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiochemistryUniversity of LucknowLucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyCollege of Basic Science & Humanities, S.D. Agricultural UniversityBanaskanthaIndia

Personalised recommendations