Advertisement

Capitalist Development and Theories of Imperialism

  • Richard Westra
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Insights into Apocalypse Economics book series (PIAE)

Abstract

In distinguishing between formal and real subsumption of the labor and production process of society by capital Marx provides a formative periodizing of capitalism. Yet, losing sight of Marx’s subtle distinctions, it would be the writings of Karl Kautsky, in whose hands the very term Marxism originates, that most influenced generations of Marx’s followers. Kautsky maintained that Marxism is a theory of historical directionality. He argued that Marx’s study of capitalism constituted a subtheory of historical materialism and confirmed socialism as the historical telos. A combination of theoretical problems deriving from Kautsky’s reconstruction of Marxism plus the fact that capitalism would survive its first major economic crisis at the close of the nineteenth century to emerge reloaded in its imperialist stage by the early twentieth century animated the important work of Rudolf Hilferding, V.I. Lenin, and Nicolai Bukharin. Theorizing of imperialism provides the foundation for studies of the corporate form of business enterprise and what is referred to today as financialization.

Keywords

Formal and real subsumption Joint-stock company Finance capital Monopoly Imperialism 

References

  1. Anderson, P. 1996. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bayly, C.A. 2004. The Birth of the Modern World 1780–1914. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Brewer, A. 1990. Marxist Theories of Imperialism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bukharin, N. 1973. Imperialism and World Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  5. Duplessis, R. 1997. Transitions to Capitalism in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Frieden, J. 2006. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Gronow, J. 1986. On the Formation of Marxism. Helsinki: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
  8. Haupt, G. 1982. Marx and Marxism. In The History of Marxism, ed. E. Hobsbawm, vol. 1. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hilferding, R. 1981. Finance Capital. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  10. Kautsky, K. 1887/1903. The Economic Doctrines of Karl Marx. https://www.marxists.org/archive/kautsky/1903/economic/index.htm. Accessed 2 Aug 2018.
  11. Landes, D.S. 1969. The Unbound Prometheus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lenin, V.I. 1975. Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  13. Marx, K. 1904. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Chicago: Charles H. Kerr & Co.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 1973. Grundrisse. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 1977. Capital Volume I. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1991. Capital Volume III. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  17. McDonough, T., and R. Drago. 1989. Crises of Capitalism and the First Crisis of Marxism. Review of Radical Political Economics 21 (3): 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Overton, M. 1996. Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Uno, K. 2016. The Types of Economic Policies under Capitalism. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Westra, R. 2009. Political Economy and Globalization. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2016. Unleashing Usury: How Finance Opened the Door to Capitalism Then Swallowed It Whole. Atlanta, GA: Clarity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Westra
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Macau StudiesUniversity of MacauMacauChina

Personalised recommendations