Advertisement

Geographical Expertise: From Places to Processes and Back Again

  • Colin RobertsonEmail author
  • Rob Feick
Chapter
  • 211 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter reviews Collins and Evans’ “Periodic Table of Expertises” and applies its expanded model of expertise to geographical expertise—the area of expertise related to places. Taking the position that expertise can be acquired through both experience and formal training, this chapter explores how thinking about geographic knowledge and expertise has evolved to encompass both place-based and process-based dimensions. Specifically, it demonstrates how recent developments in mobile phone and geolocation technologies change the dimensional reconstruction of particular forms of geographic expertise.

Keywords

Geography Geolocation Expertise 

References

  1. Agrawal, A., and C.C. Gibson. 1999. Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development 27 (4): 629–649.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. 1995. Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis 27 (2): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barron, E.S., C. Sthultz, D. Hurley, and A. Pringle. 2015. Names Matter: Interdisciplinary Research on Taxonomy and Nomenclature for Ecosystem Management. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment 39 (5): 640–660.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133315589706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann, M.J., and J.C. McPherson. 1970. City Size Distribution in a Central Place Hierarchy: An Alternative Approach. Journal of Regional Science 10 (1): 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, B.J.L., and W.L. Garrison. 1958. A Note on Central Place Theory and the Range of a Good. Economic Geography 34 (4): 304–311.  https://doi.org/10.2307/142348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Besag, J., and J. Newell. 1991. The Detection of Clusters in Rare Diseases. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 154: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, G., M. Kelly, and D. Whitall. 2014. Which ‘Public?’ Sampling Effects in Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) and Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) Systems for Public Lands Management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57 (2): 190–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunsdon, C., S. Fotheringham, and M. Charlton. 1998. Geographically Weighted Regression—Modelling Spatial Non-stationarity. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 47 (3): 431–443.Google Scholar
  10. Buytaert, W., Z. Zulkafli, S. Grainger, L. Acosta, T.C. Alemie, J. Bastiaensen, and M. Foggin. 2014. Citizen Science in Hydrology and Water Resources: Opportunities for Knowledge Generation, Ecosystem Service Management, and Sustainable Development. Frontiers in Earth Science 2: 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cancer Research UK. 2016. Sellafield, Radiation and Childhood Cancer – Shedding Light on Cancer Clusters Near Nuclear Sites. Accessed June 14, 2018 http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2016/10/31/sellafield-radiation-and-childhood-cancer-shedding-light-on-cancer-clusters-near-nuclear-sites/.
  12. Coburn, J. 2005. Street Science: Community Knowledge and Environmental Health Justice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohn, J.P. 2008. Citizen Science: Can Volunteers Do Real Research? BioScience 58 (3): 192–197.  https://doi.org/10.1641/B580303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Collins, H. 2011. Three Dimensions of Expertise. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 12 (2): 253–273.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-011-9203-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, H.M., and R. Evans. 2002. The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conklin, A., Z. Morris, and E. Nolte. 2015. What Is the Evidence Base for Public Involvement in Health-Care Policy?: Results of a Systematic Scoping Review. Health Expectations 18 (2): 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Craig, W.J., T.M. Harris, and D. Weiner. 2002. Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cresswell, T. 2013. Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Editorial: Trust We Must. Nature Geoscience 10 (6): 395.Google Scholar
  19. Dilke, O.A. 1987. The Culmination of Greek Cartography in Ptolemy. The History of Cartography 1: 177–200.Google Scholar
  20. Downs, R.M., and D. Stea. 2011. Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behaviour: Process and Products. In The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, ed. M. Dodge, R. Kitchin, and C. Perkins, 312–317. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Editorial. 2017. Trust We Must. Nature Geoscience 10 (6): 395.Google Scholar
  22. Egenhofer, M.J., and D.M. Mark. 1995. Naive Geography. Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS. Conference Proceedings, Published in the Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series, 1–15. Berlin: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-60392-1_1.Google Scholar
  23. Forrester, J.W. 1970. Urban Dynamics. IMR; Industrial Management Review (Pre-1986) 11 (3): 67.Google Scholar
  24. Fotheringham, A. 1997. Trends in Quantitative Methods I: Stressing the Local. Progress in Human Geography 21 (1): 88–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner, M.J., M.P. Snee, A.J. Hall, C.A. Powell, S. Downes, and J.D. Terrell. 1990. Results of Case-Control Study of Leukaemia and Lymphoma Among Young People Near Sellafield Nuclear Plant in West Cumbria. BMJ 300 (6722): 423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.300.6722.423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Getis, A., and J.K. Ord. 1992. The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis 24 (3): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Golledge, R.G. 2002. The Nature of Geographic Knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2003. Human Wayfinding and Cognitive Maps. In The Colonization of Unfamiliar Landscapes, 49–54. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Goodchild, M.F. 2007. Citizens as Sensors: The World of Volunteered Geography. GeoJournal 69 (4): 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haklay, M. 2013. Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, ed. M. Sui, S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, 105–122. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartshorne, R. 1939. The Nature of Geography: A Critical Survey of Current Thought in the Light of the Past. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 29 (3): 173–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey, F., and N. Chrisman. 1998. Boundary Objects and the Social Construction of GIS Technology. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30 (9): 1683–1694.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a301683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hjalmars, U., M. Killdorff, G. Gustafsson, and N. Nagarwalla. 1996. Childhood Leukaemia in Sweden: Using GIS and a Spatial Scan Statistic for Cluster Detection. Statistics in Medicine 15: 707–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hmielowski, J.D., L. Feldman, T.A. Myers, A. Leiserowitz, and E. Maibach. 2014. An Attack on Science? Media Use, Trust in Scientists, and Perceptions of Global Warming. Public Understanding of Science 23 (7): 866–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hollenstein, Livia, and Ross Purves. 2010. Exploring Place Through User-Generated Content: Using Flickr Tags to Describe City Cores. Journal of Spatial Information Science 1: 21–48.Google Scholar
  36. Innes, J.E., and D. Booher. 2004. Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice 5 (4): 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jacquez, G.M., and D.A. Greiling. 2003. Geographic Boundaries in Breast, Lung and Colorectal Cancers in Relation to Exposure to Air Toxics in Long Island, New York. International Journal of Health Geographics 2 (1): 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jankowski, P., M. Czepkiewicz, M. Młodkowski, Z. Zwoliński, and M. Wójcicki. 2017. Evaluating the Scalability of Public Participation in Urban Land Use Planning: A Comparison of Geoweb Methods with Face-to-Face Meetings. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808317719709.Google Scholar
  39. Kahila-Tani, M., A. Broberg, M. Kyttä, and T. Tyger. 2016. Let the Citizens Map—Public Participation GIS as a Planning Support System in the Helsinki Master Plan Process. Planning Practice & Research 31 (2): 195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kearns, R.A. 1993. Place and Health: Towards a Reformed Medical Geography. The Professional Geographer 45 (2): 139–147.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1993.00139.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kearns, R., and G. Moon. 2002. From Medical to Health Geography: Novelty, Place and Theory After a Decade of Change. Progress in Human Geography 26 (5): 605–625.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132502ph389oa.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. King, J.M., A.R. Cabrera, and R.E. Kelly. 2009. The Snowtweets Project: Communicating Snow Depth Measurements from Specialists and Non-Specialists via Mobile Communication Technologies and Social Networks. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 11, ED11A-0562.Google Scholar
  43. Kitchin, R., and M. Blades. 2002. The Cognition of Geographic Space. Vol. 4. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  44. Kukla, A. 2013. Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Kulldorff, M., and N. Nagarwalla. 1995. Spatial Disease Clusters: Detection and Inference. Statistics in Medicine 14: 799–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kwan, M.-P. 2013. Beyond Space (As We Knew It): Toward Temporally Integrated Geographies of Segregation, Health, and Accessibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103 (5): 1078–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.792177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kwan, M.-P., and T. Schwanen. 2009. Quantitative Revolution 2: The Critical (Re)Turn. The Professional Geographer 61 (3): 283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee, D.B., Jr. 1973. Requiem for Large-Scale Models. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 39 (3): 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lowry, I.S. 1964. A Model of Metropolis (No. RM-40535-RC). RAND Corporation, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  50. Nelson, T.A., and B. Boots. 2008. Detecting Spatial Hot Spots in Landscape Ecology. Ecography 31 (5): 556–566.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.906-7590.2008.05548.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nyerges, T., and R. Aguirre. 2011. Public Participation in Analytic-Deliberative Decision Making: Evaluating a Large-Group Online Field Experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (3): 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Sullivan, D., and D. Unwin. 2014. Geographic Information Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Openshaw, S., M. Charlton, C. Wymer, and A. Craft. 1987. A Mark 1 Geographical Analysis Machine for the Automated Analysis of Point Data Sets. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 1 (4): 335–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pariser, E. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  55. Parker, L., M.S. Pearce, H.O. Dickinson, M. Aitkin, and A.W. Craft. 1999. Stillbirths Among Offspring of Male Radiation Workers at Sellafield Nuclear Reprocessing Plant. The Lancet 354: 1407–1414.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04138-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parr, J.B. 1973. Growth Poles, Regional Development, and Central Place Theory. Papers of the Regional Science Association 31 (1): 173–212. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preece, J. 2016. Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32 (8): 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Riedlinger, E.D., and F. Berkes. 2001. Contributions of Traditional Knowledge to Understanding Climate Change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Record 37 (203): 315–328.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247400017058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Robertson, C., and R. Feick. 2017. Defining Local Experts: Geographical Expertise as a Basis for Geographic Information Quality. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2017) 22: 1–14.Google Scholar
  60. Robertson, C., R. McLeman, and H. Lawrence. 2015. Winters Too Warm to Skate? Citizen-Science Reported Variability in Availability of Outdoor Skating in Canada. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 59 (4): 383–390.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rothman, K. 1990. A Sobering Start for the Cluster Busters’ Conference. American Journal of Epidemiology 132 (supp 1): 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Seltzer, E., and D. Mahmoudi. 2013. Citizen Participation, Open Innovation, and Crowdsourcing: Challenges and Opportunities for Planning. Journal of Planning Literature 28 (1): 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sheppard, S.R. 2012. Visualizing Climate Change: A Guide to Visual Communication of Climate Change and Developing Local Solutions. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Star, S.L., and J.R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stevens, M., M. Vitos, J. Altenbuchner, G. Conquest, J. Lewis, and M. Haklay. 2014. Taking Participatory Citizen Science to Extremes. IEEE Pervasive Computing 13 (2): 20–29.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2014.37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sui, D., S. Elwood, and M. Goodchild, eds. 2013. Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  67. Wachinger, G., O. Renn, C. Begg, and C. Kuhlicke. 2013. The Risk Perception Paradox-Implications for Governance and Communication of Natural Hazards. Risk Analysis 33 (6): 1049–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson, M., and M. Graham. 2013. Neogeography and Volunteered Geographic Information: A Conversation with Michael Goodchild and Andrew Turner. Environment and Planning A 45 (1): 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada
  2. 2.School of PlanningUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations