Abstract
This chapter draws on the importance of movement for human perceptual experience and how it influences brain dynamics. By use of Mobil Brain/Body Imaging (MoBI), artists with interest in the experience of art can get insights into human cortical activity during artworks. Specifically, art that depends on action faces challenges regarding the exploration of human brain activity during their artistic acts or performances. We give an account of how architectural experience, which essentially rests on perception and movement, can be investigated using a MoBI method. We present results from studies that indicate fundamental differences in cognitive and behavioural responses when comparing active behaviour compared to passive perception. Consideration of the processes underlying movement and cognition suggests that action alters perception, which in turn alters experience. MoBI is therefore able to reveal aspects of natural cognition, which would otherwise go unnoticed highlighting the advantage of using MoBI in animate forms of art.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberti LB, Bartoli C, Leoni G (1986) The ten books of architecture: the 1755 Leoni edition. Dover Publications
Bachelard G (1969) The poetics of space. Beacon Press
Banaei M, Hatami J, Yazdanfar A, Gramann K (2017) Walking through architectural spaces: the impact of interior forms on human brain dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00477
Bergson H, Pogson FL (1960) Time and free will, an essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Harper
Böhme G (1937–), Engels-Schwarzpaul A-C (2017) Atmospheric architectures the aesthetics of felt spaces. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Plc
Bradley MM, Lang PJ (1994) Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 25:49–59
Brown H, Adams RA, Parees I, Edwards M, Friston K (2013) Active inference, sensory attenuation and illusions. Cogn Process 14:411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-013-0571-3
Brunia CHM (2003) CNV and SPN: indices of anticipatory behavior. The Bereitschaftspotential. Springer US, Boston, MA, pp 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0189-3_13
Cisek P (2007) Cortical mechanisms of action selection: the affordance competition hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 362:1585–1599. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2054
Cisek P, Pastor-Bernier A (2014) On the challenges and mechanisms of embodied decisions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0479
Clark A (2015) Surfing uncertainty: prediction, action and the embodied mind. Oxford University Press, New York
Dickie G (1997) Introduction to aesthetics: an analytic approach. Oxford University Press
Fazio MW, Moffett M, Wodehouse L (2008) A world history of architecture, 2nd edn. Laurence King
Friston K (2003) Learning and inference in the brain. Neural Netw 16:1325–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2003.06.005
Friston K (2005) A theory of cortical responses. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:815–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1622
Friston KJ (2013) Active inference and free energy. Behav Brain Sci 36:212–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12002142
Friston KJ, Kilner J, Harrison L (2006) A free energy principle for the brain. J Physiol 100:70–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHYSPARIS.2006.10.001
Friston KJ, Shiner T, FitzGerald T, Galea JM, Adams R, Brown H, Dolan RJ, Moran R, Stephan KE, Bestmann S (2012) Dopamine, affordance and active inference. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002327. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002327
Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2012) The phenomenological mind, 2nd edn. Routledge
Gibson J (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Hought Mifflin, Boston
Gramann K, Gwin JT, Bigdely-Shamlo N, Ferris DP, Makeig S (2010) Visual evoked responses during standing and walking. Front Hum Neurosci 4:202. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00202
Gramann K, Gwin JT, Ferris DP, Oie K, Jung T-P, Lin C-T, Liao L-D, Makeig S (2011) Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev Neurosci 22:593–608. https://doi.org/10.1515/RNS.2011.047
Gramann K, Jung T-P, Ferris DP, Lin C-T, Makeig S (2014) Toward a new cognitive neuroscience: modeling natural brain dynamics. Front Hum Neurosci 8:444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00444
Gramann K, Hohlefeld FU, Gehrke L, Klug M (2018) Heading computation in the human retrosplenial complex during full-body rotation. biorxiv 417972. https://doi.org/10.1101/417972
Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP (2010) Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J Neurophysiol 103:3526–3534. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00105.2010
Gwin JT, Gramann K, Makeig S, Ferris DP (2011) Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking. Neuroimage 54:1289–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEUROIMAGE.2010.08.066
Hohwy J (2013) The predictive mind. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682737.001.0001
Holl S, Pallasmaa J, Pérez-Gómez A (2006) Questions of perception: phenomenology of architecture. William Stout Publishers, San Fransisco
Johnson-Laird PN, Philip N (1988) The computer and the mind: an introduction to cognitive science. Harvard University Press
Jungnickel E, Gramann K (2016) Mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) of physical interaction with dynamically moving objects. Front Hum Neurosci 10:306. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00306
Jungnickel E, Gramann K (2018) MoBI—mobile brain body imaging. In: Ayaz H, Dehais F (eds) Neuroergonomics: the brain at work and in everyday life. Academic Press, p 374
Kawabata H, Zeki S (2004) Neural correlates of beauty. J Neurophysiol 91:1699–1705
Keele SW (1968) Movement control in skilled motor performance. Psychol Bull 70:387–403. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026739
Kiebel SJ, Daunizeau J, Friston KJ (2008) A hierarchy of time-scales and the brain. PLoS Comput Biol 4:e1000209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000209
Kothe C (2014) LabStreamingLayer. https://github.com/sccn/labstreaminglayer
Libet B, Gleason CA, Wright EW, Pearl DK (1983) Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (Readiness-potential). Brain 106:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/106.3.623
Luck SJ, Kappenman ES (2011) Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. Oxford University Press, New York, USA
Ma Q, Hu L, Wang X (2015) Emotion and novelty processing in an implicit aesthetic experience of architectures: evidence from an event-related potential study. NeuroReport 26:279–284. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000344
Macpherson F (2014) Is the sense-data theory a representationalist theory? Ratio 27:369–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12085
Makeig S, Gramann K, Jung T-P, Sejnowski TJ, Poizner H (2009) Linking brain, mind and behavior. Int J Psychophysiol 73:95–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPSYCHO.2008.11.008
Marr D (1982) Vision: a computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. W.H. Freeman
Merleau-Ponty M, Edie JM (1964) The primacy of perception: and other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Northwestern University Press
Merleau-Ponty M, Lingis A, Lefort C (1968) The visible and the invisible: followed by working notes, 1st edn. Northwestern University Press
Miller GA (2003) The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. TRENDS Cogn Sci 7:141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
Nagel T (1974) Philosophical review what is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev (Duke University Press)
Noë A (2004) Action in perception. MIT Press
Norberg-Schulz C (1997) Nightlands. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.; London
Palmer JA, Kreutz-Delgado K, Makeig S (2011) AMICA: an adaptive mixture of independent component analyzers with shared components
Pezzulo G, Cisek P (2016) Navigating the affordance landscape: feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci 20:414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.013
Rasmussen SE (1959) Experiencing architecture. Chapman & Hall, London
Rasmussen SE (2012) Om at opleve arkitektur. Linde Tryk, Aarhus
Rietveld E, Kiverstein J (2014) A rich landscape of affordances. Ecol Psychol 26:325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
Robinson S (2011) Nesting: body, dwelling, mind. William Stout Publishers, US
Singh AK, Chen H-T, Cheng Y-F, King J-T, Ko L-W, Gramann K, Lin C-T (2018) Visual appearance modulates prediction error in virtual reality. IEEE Access 6:24617–24624. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2832089
Thagard P (2009) Why cognitive science needs philosophy and vice versa. Top Cogn Sci 1:237–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01016.x
Thompson E (2007) Mind in life: biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Töllner T, Wang Y, Makeig S, Müller HJ, Jung T-P, Gramann K (2017) Two independent frontal midline theta oscillations during conflict detection and adaptation in a Simon-type manual reaching task. J Neurosci 37:2504–2515. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1752-16.2017
van Boxtel GJM, Böcker KBE (2004) Cortical measures of anticipation. J Psychophysiol 18:61–76. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.18.23.61
Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience
Vartanian O, Navarrete G, Chatterjee A, Fich LB, Leder H, Modroño C, Nadal M, Rostrup N, Skov M (2013) Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:10446–10453. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301227110
Vartanian O, Navarrete G, Chatterjee A, Fich LB, Gonzalez-Mora JL, Leder H, Modroño C, Nadal M, Rostrup N, Skov M (2015) Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions. J Environ Psychol 41:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.006
Vesely D (2004) Architecture in the age of divided representation: the question of creativity in the shadow of production. MIT Press
Vitruvius, Morgan MH, Morris H (1960) Vitruvius: the ten books on architecture. Dover Publications
Walter WG, Cooper R, Crow HJ, McCallum WC, Warren WJ, Aldridge VJ, van Leeuwen WS, Kamp A (1967) Contingent negative variation and evoked responses recorded by radio-telemetry in free-ranging subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 23:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(67)90116-2
Zeki S (1998) Art and the brain. Dædalus 127:71–103
Zeki S (2002) Trying to make sense of art. Nature 418:918–919. https://doi.org/10.1038/418918a
Zumthor P (2006) Atmospheres. Birkhäuser, Basel
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Djebbara, Z., Fich, L.B., Gramann, K. (2019). Understanding Perceptual Experience of Art Using Mobile Brain/Body Imaging. In: Nijholt, A. (eds) Brain Art. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-14322-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-14323-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)